Skip to content
Matpac Wrestling Club Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Matpac Wrestling Club Inc

To operate wrestling programs for the benefit of youth and their families so they may enjoy growth through recreational and competitive wrestling.

$999k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$622kRecreation & Sports$205kReligion$40kHealth$15kCommunity Improvement$10kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$5k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $764,308, the rows itemized in this filing. The $999,347 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $235,039 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $390k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$32,002
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UND Alumni Association$250,000
Friends of Shiloh Foundation$100,000
University of Mary$100,000
USA Wrestling Association$100,000
Bismarck State College$90,000
USA Wrestling - ND$38,635
Bismarck State College$32,002
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$12,000
Mercer Brush Lake Community Assoc$10,000
Pulse Outreach$10,000
VFW Post #2948$9,723
Bismarck Cancer Center$6,598
Mandan Touchdown Club$5,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Thief River Falls Education Foundation: $50k → 10%VFW Post #2948: $10k → 10%Pulse Outreach: $25k → 11%Fellowship of Christian Athletes: $12k → 15%Friends of Shiloh Foundation: $100k → 10%Mandan Wrestling Club: $7k → 10%USA Wrestling Association: $100k → 12%UND Alumni Association: $250k → 13%Pulse Outreach: $10k → 11%BHS Football Boosters Foundation: $10k → 10%Mandan Touchdown Club: $5k → 10%USA Wrestling - ND: $39k → 12%Bismarck Cancer Center: $7k → 10%Hold the Line: $5k → 10%Pro-Cathedral of St Mary: $5k → 10%Mercer Brush Lake Community Assoc: $10k → 10%Mindful Health: $8k → 10%University of Mary: $100k → 10%University of Mary: $32k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mankato Christian Academy

Preparing Students for the Future in Jesus' Name.

—
2
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
3
Texas Collegiate Wrestling Foundation
Recreation & Sports
4
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
5
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
6
Gustavus Adolphus College

Gustavus Adolphus College is a church-related, residential liberal arts college firmly rooted in its Swedish and Lutheran heritage. The College offers students of high aspiration and promise a liberal arts education of recognized…

Education
7
Northern State University Foundation

The Northern State University Foundation is dedicated to securing the future of Northern State University. Its purpose is to solicit and administer funds and to pursue other activities to advance this goal.

—
8
Northwest Conference

Through its values, the northwest conference unites its member colleges and universities in the pacific northwest to empower student-athletes in their pursuit of academic and athletic excellence at the division iii level.

Recreation & Sports
9
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
10
University of Notre Dame du Lac

See Schedule O. See explanation for Form 990, Part I, Line 1 - Organization's Mission above.

Education
11
University of Northwestern - St Paul

See schedule o. founded in 1902, university of northwestern - st. paul is a nondenominational christian university that integrates the educational philosophy of "faith, learning and living" through two focuses: higher education and media.…

Education
12
North Dakota Soybean Growers Association

Support Policy that benefits North Dakota Soybean growers through farmer-led advocacy and partnerships.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Und Alumni Association and Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Usa Wrestling of Nd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UND Alumni Association and Foundation: $250,000 · EducationUND Alumni Association and FoundationUniversity of Mary: $132,000 · EducationUniversity of MaryBismarck State College Foundation: $122,002 · EducationBismarck State College FoundationFRIENDS OF SHILOH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF SHILOH FOUNDATION INCTHIEF RIVER FALLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationTHIEF RIVER FALLS EDUCATION FOUNDATIONUSA WRESTLING OF ND: $138,635 · Recreation & SportsUSA WRESTLING OF N…MANDAN WRESTLING CLUB: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsMANDAN TOUCHDOWN CLUB INC: $5,350 · Recreation & SportsBISMARCK HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL BOOSTERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherMERCER BRUSH LAKE COMM ASSN: $10,000 · OtherVFW AUXILIARY DEPT OF NORTH DAKOTA: $9,723 · OtherMindful Health: $8,000 · OtherCHURCH OF ST MARY - BISMARCK PARISH: $5,000 · OtherHOLD THE LINE: $5,000 · OtherPULSE OUTREACH: $35,000 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentBISMARCK CANCER CENTER: $6,598 · Health
Education$654,002Recreation & Sports$150,985Other$47,723Religion$35,000Youth Development$12,000Health$6,598

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUND Alumni Association and Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUSA WRESTLING OF ND: $138,635 over 1y, 53% of budgetUniversity of Mary: $132,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBismarck State College Foundation: $122,002 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF SHILOH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHIEF RIVER FALLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPULSE OUTREACH: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANDAN WRESTLING CLUB: $7,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetBISMARCK CANCER CENTER: $6,598 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANDAN TOUCHDOWN CLUB INC: $5,350 over 1y, 4.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO3.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Matpac Wrestling Club Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Matpac Wrestling Club Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Matpac Wrestling Club Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Matpac Wrestling Club Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Matpac Wrestling Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home