· Public charity
Matpac Wrestling Club Inc
To operate wrestling programs for the benefit of youth and their families so they may enjoy growth through recreational and competitive wrestling.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $764,308 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $999,347 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $235,039 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $103k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $390k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UND Alumni Association | $250,000 |
| Friends of Shiloh Foundation | $100,000 |
| University of Mary | $100,000 |
| USA Wrestling Association | $100,000 |
| Bismarck State College | $90,000 |
| USA Wrestling - ND | $38,635 |
| Bismarck State College | $32,002 |
| Fellowship of Christian Athletes | $12,000 |
| Mercer Brush Lake Community Assoc | $10,000 |
| Pulse Outreach | $10,000 |
| VFW Post #2948 | $9,723 |
| Bismarck Cancer Center | $6,598 |
| Mandan Touchdown Club | $5,350 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preparing Students for the Future in Jesus' Name.
Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.
Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.
The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.
Gustavus Adolphus College is a church-related, residential liberal arts college firmly rooted in its Swedish and Lutheran heritage. The College offers students of high aspiration and promise a liberal arts education of recognized…
The Northern State University Foundation is dedicated to securing the future of Northern State University. Its purpose is to solicit and administer funds and to pursue other activities to advance this goal.
Through its values, the northwest conference unites its member colleges and universities in the pacific northwest to empower student-athletes in their pursuit of academic and athletic excellence at the division iii level.
As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…
See Schedule O. See explanation for Form 990, Part I, Line 1 - Organization's Mission above.
See schedule o. founded in 1902, university of northwestern - st. paul is a nondenominational christian university that integrates the educational philosophy of "faith, learning and living" through two focuses: higher education and media.…
Support Policy that benefits North Dakota Soybean growers through farmer-led advocacy and partnerships.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Und Alumni Association and Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Usa Wrestling of Nd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UND Alumni Association and Foundation ↗
- Who funds USA WRESTLING OF ND ↗
- Who funds University of Mary ↗
- Who funds Bismarck State College Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SHILOH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THIEF RIVER FALLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PULSE OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds MANDAN WRESTLING CLUB ↗
- Who funds BISMARCK CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds MANDAN TOUCHDOWN CLUB INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Matpac Wrestling Club Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Matpac Wrestling Club Inc?
Find your warmest path to Matpac Wrestling Club Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.