Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

$707M
Granted FY2025still arriving
106
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$4.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Arts & Culture$32MEducation$15MScience & Tech$6.1MHealth$4.6MMembership Benefit$3.0MPhilanthropy$2.7MPublic Benefit$2.5MHousing & Shelter$2.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 106 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 106 grants below total $9,887,078 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $706,619,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $696,731,922 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k54 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k43 grants · $3.5M
  • $250k+2 grants · $5.0M
$38,300
Median grant
24
States reached
$45.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Technology Review Inc$4,204,206
MIT International Inc$843,639
Medecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc$200,000
Empirical Resolution Inc$150,000
ImpactAssetsInc$150,000
SXD Inc$130,400
Alumni Assoc of Alpha Mu Chapter of Phi Kappa Sigma Fraternity Inc$125,793
My Brother's Keeper Task Force Inc$125,000
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research$111,150
Zeta Phi Chapter House Corporation of Alpha Phi International Fraternity In$106,202
Forma LLC$105,000
Lubavitch of Cambridge Inc$100,000
Heterodox Academy$100,000
CoFlo Medical$100,000
The Regents of the University of California$98,274
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Issara Institute Inc: $75k → 10%A Breeze of Hope: $50k → 10%Willow International Everfree: $75k → 10%Tarjimly Inc: $85k → 5%Waking Women Healing Institute: $10k → 11%Kuza Project: $10k → 7%Anniecannons Inc: $20k → 10%Sco Family of Services: $20k → 6%The Okoa Project: $10k → 7%Camp Kesem: $42k → 14%Asia Initiatives: $70k → 17%Asia Initiatives Inc: $35k → 17%Asia Initiatives Inc: $20k → 17%SameSame Inc: $60k → 17%Rogerson Communities Inc: $9k → 16%My Brother's Keeper Task Force Inc: $130k → 8%My Brother's Keeper Task Force Inc: $125k → 8%CAMBRIDGE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $10k → 8%CAMBRIDGE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $10k → 8%Urban League of Eastern Massachusetts Inc: $100k → 16%Kendall Community Group: $21k → 8%Community Art Center: $21k → 8%Margaret Fuller House: $20k → 8%COMMUNITY ART CENTER INC: $20k → 8%Community Art Center: $18k → 8%Cambridge License Advisory Board: $15k → 8%Margaret Fuller House: $15k → 8%Community Art Center: $14k → 8%Cambridge Community Center Inc: $14k → 8%Cambridge Community Center Inc: $13k → 8%Cambridge Community Center: $13k → 8%Casa Myrna Vasquez Inc: $250k → 16%Cambridge Community Center: $13k → 8%Enroot: $12k → 8%Cambridge Community Center: $10k → 8%Community Art Center Inc: $10k → 8%Enroot: $10k → 8%Enroot: $8k → 8%Enroot Inc: $8k → 8%Enroot Inc: $8k → 8%Community Art Center Inc: $7k → 8%Margaret Fuller House: $6k → 8%Margaret Fuller Neighborhood House: $6k → 8%My Brother's Keeper Task Force Inc: $125k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$58M · 94 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

94 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

94
203

Total granted

$58M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+5%

Still filing today

77%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    Technology Review Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $31M · revenue +25% · 26% of their budget
  • PB
    PHI BETA EPSILON CORPORATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +216%
  • PS
    PHI SIGMA KAPPA GRAND CHAPTER OF OMICRON
    6× · 2018–2025 · $780k · revenue +147% · 50% of their budget

Funded once

  • AC
    Axim Collaborative Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $5.0M · revenue -67%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $306k · revenue +26%
  • Trustees of Tufts Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $275k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
3
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
4
Mit Enterprise Forum Inc

We inform, connect, and coach technology entrepreneurs-enabling them to rapidly transform ideas into world-changing companies. We are a global network of local organizations, inspired by MIT, and open to the world.

—
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
7
Orcid Inc

Orcid provides an identifier for individuals to use with their name as they engage in research, scholarship, and innovation activities. we provide open tools that enable transparent and trustworthy connections between researchers, their…

Education
8
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
9
Harvard Management Company Inc

Provide investment management services to harvard university.

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
12
The Massachusetts Green High Performance Computing Center Inc

To own, maintain and lease a facility which will house a high performance computing center to support, assist, enhance, and advance the scientific research activities of its member universities.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Hack Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Local History MuseumsCommunity FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Lgbtq+ Community SupportSenior Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Community Arts CentersYouth Development ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Health Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%8%<5yr14%17%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr14%15%35–55yr14%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr14%12%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr19%51%20–35yr14%5%35–55yr14%17%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%8/339
the rest of the field
11%
4,712/42,019

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

194 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 194 of the 341 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

23
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
189/194
Grantees still filing
119/194
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Technology Review Inc — $30,725,835 · Arts & CultureTechnology Review Inc+4 more — $485,000 · Arts & CultureLandmark Bio PBLLC — $2,500,000 · OtherLandmark Bio PBLLCPHI BETA EPSILON CORPORATION — $1,412,766 · OtherPHI BETA EPSILON CORPORATIONPHI SIGMA KAPPA GRAND CHAPTER OF OMICRON — $780,297 · OtherDELTA KAPPA EPSILON INC — $727,770 · Other+133 more — $16,170,131 · Other+133 moreAxim Collaborative Inc — $5,000,000 · EducationAxim Collaborative IncBETA NU HOUSE CORPORATION — $4,425,807 · EducationBETA NU HOUSE CORPORATI…MIT International Inc — $3,305,562 · EducationMIT International Inc+21 more — $2,878,954 · Education+21 moreIMPACTASSETSINC — $2,387,643 · PhilanthropyCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $199,500 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $125,570 · PhilanthropyPARITYORG INC (FKA OPERATION 50-50 INC) — $1,939,000 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC — $200,000 · Civil RightsNARRATIVE NATION INC — $188,000 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE OF SEVENTY — $100,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $100,000 · Civil RightsMy Brother's Keeper Task Force Inc — $380,000 · Human ServicesCASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesAsia Initiatives — $125,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ART CENTER INC — $110,695 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF EASTERN MASSCHUSETTS INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesTarjimly Inc — $85,000 · Human ServicesISSARA INSTITUTE INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesWillow International Everfree — $75,000 · Human ServicesCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $61,000 · Human ServicesSAMESAME INC — $60,000 · Human Services+4 more — $182,625 · Human ServicesCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $450,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $400,000 · InternationalDTWO LTD DBA Awana Digital — $143,000 · InternationalFamily Health International Inc — $100,000 · InternationalPROJECT HEALTHY CHILDREN INC — $100,000 · InternationalKhushi Baby Inc — $60,000 · InternationalWater for South Sudan Inc — $50,000 · InternationalCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC — $50,000 · InternationalALIGHT ALLIANCE TO LEAD IMPACT IN GLOBAL — $50,000 · International+2 more — $78,000 · International
Arts & Culture$31,210,835Other$21,590,964Education$15,610,323Philanthropy$2,712,713Civil Rights$2,527,000Human Services$1,504,320International$1,481,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTechnology Review Inc — $30,725,835 over 7y, 26% of budgetAxim Collaborative Inc — $5,000,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetBETA NU HOUSE CORPORATION — $4,425,807 over 7y, 92% of budgetMIT International Inc — $3,305,562 over 6y, 27% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC — $2,387,643 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPARITYORG INC (FKA OPERATION 50-50 INC) — $1,939,000 over 5y, 94% of budgetPHI BETA EPSILON CORPORATION — $1,412,766 over 7y, 23% of budgetPHI SIGMA KAPPA GRAND CHAPTER OF OMICRON — $780,297 over 6y, 50% of budgetDELTA KAPPA EPSILON INC — $727,770 over 7y, 46% of budgetWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH — $638,801 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetZeta Phi Chapter House Corporation Alpha Phi International Fraternity Inc — $573,128 over 8y, 23% of budgetTHE BETA FOUNDATION A FRATERNITY HOUSE — $482,791 over 8y, 44% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $450,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $400,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $393,369 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMy Brother's Keeper Task Force Inc — $380,000 over 3y, 52% of budgetALUMNI ASSOC OF ALPHA MU CHAPTER OF PHI KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY INC — $318,781 over 5y, 26% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC — $306,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHETERODOX ACADEMY — $300,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetDOVER CLUB OF MIT INC — $299,537 over 6y, 42% of budgetLAMBDA ZETA ASSOCIATES INC — $276,088 over 5y, 14% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $275,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LAMBDA PHI CHAPTER OF THE ALPHA DELTA PHI FRATERNITY I — $253,719 over 7y, 13% of budgetJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC — $250,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ INC — $250,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSTEM FROM DANCE INC — $250,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetSolar Freeze Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetFRANKLIN W OLIN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING INC — $243,220 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INC — $240,571 over 6y, 24% of budgetINC ALUMNI PSI DELTAPHI DELTA THETA FR — $218,362 over 6y, 76% of budgetALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE NU DELTA CHAPTER OF PHI MU DELTA FRATERNITY — $207,958 over 8y, 14% of budgetALPHA THETA CHAPTER OF SIGMA CHI INC — $202,985 over 7y, 20% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC — $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetADA DEVELOPERS ACADEMY — $200,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE LAUNCHCODE FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWomens Audio Mission — $200,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $199,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetNARRATIVE NATION INC — $188,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetMASS ETA OF PHI KAPPA THETA ALUMNI CORP — $162,362 over 6y, 65% of budgetTECHNOLOGY CHAPTER ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $154,832 over 3y, 32% of budgetEPSILON THETA CORPORATION INC — $154,196 over 7y, 48% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC — $150,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSNHC INC — $148,067 over 8y, 9.3% of budgetDTWO LTD DBA Awana Digital — $143,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE — $140,530 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cambridge Savings Cha…Cambridge Community F…President and Fellows…The Elevate Prize Fou…Eastern Cambridge Fou…Tr Uw Helen F Kimball…Liberty Mutual Founda…Bushrod H Campbell & …FfwdPloughshares Foundati…Albert O Wilson Found…The Lander Family Cha…
Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation IncMA28.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Cambridge Community Foundation · President and Fellows of Harvard College · The Elevate Prize Foundation Inc · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Tr Uw Helen F Kimball-The Moses Kimball Fund for Promotion of Good Citizenship · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Ffwd · Ploughshares Foundation · Albert O Wilson Foundation Inc · The Lander Family Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Massachusetts Institute of Technology funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 370%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Hera Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Boston Area Rape Crisis Center Inc — 82% of income from government
  • Bay Cove Human Services Inc — 70% of income from government
  • Justice Resource Institute Inc — 48% of income from government
  • The Young People's Project Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Community Art Center Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
  • Cambridge Community Center Inc — 8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research — 7% of income from government
  • Casa Myrna Vazquez Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Franklin W Olin College of Engineering Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Breakthrough Greater Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Day School Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Guitars Over Guns Organization Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The New England Council Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
37get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 341 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home