· Public charity
Massachusetts Association for Mental Health Inc
To advance mental health and well-being in the commonwealth of massachusetts by promoting and advocating for prevention, early intervention, effective treatment and research associated with mental health.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $128k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $871k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE | $178,850 |
| RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE | $170,000 |
| BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK | $169,435 |
| ASPIRE HEALTH ALLIANCE | $127,500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DORCHESTER | $75,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WORCESTER | $75,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN | $75,000 |
| ADVOCATES INC | $42,500 |
| BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION | $42,500 |
| ELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES | $42,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 74% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against -22% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $179k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC2× · 2024–2025 · $339k · revenue +3%
- SSSouth Shore Mental Health Center Inc2× · 2024–2025 · $298k · revenue +4%
- RCRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE INC2× · 2024–2025 · $255k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- CHCAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $119k · revenue -22%
- AFATKINSON FAMILY PRACTICEone grant, 2024 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…
The brookline center for community mental health provides groundbreaking mental health services rooted in meaningful innovation and compassionate care. in response to today's mental health landscape and the ongoing mental health crisis,…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Boston community pediatrics (bcp) provides ambulatory pediatric and related health care services to the residents of boston, massachusetts, and surrounding communities. bcp is a new model of innovative pediatric healthcare that addresses…
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
Medical care of boston management corp d/b/a beth israel lahey health primary care a/k/a affiliated physicians group (bilhpc) is a network of community based physicians affiliated with beth israel lahey health (bilh) and its hospitals…
Beth israel lahey health primary care (bilhpc) is a network of community based physicians affiliated with the beth israel lahey health (bilh) network and serving the patients and communities served by the lahey clinic hospital (lahey…
Centering on a concept and continuum of care that embraces the health, well-being and dignity of each patient, regardless of their ability to pay, northeast hospital corporation (nhc) has four facilities, beverly hospital, addison gilbert…
The mission of berkshire medical center is to advance health and wellness for everyone in our community in a welcoming, inclusive, and personalized environment.
Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.
The mission of northeast behavioral health corporation d/b/a beth israel lahey health behavioral services' (bilhbs) is to provide personal, compassionate, state-of-the-art, integrated behavioral healthcare that makes a difference in the…
The mission of maine behavioral health organization is to provide evidence based services leading to increased quality of life; through research, advocacy, education, operated services, and participation in public mental health policy…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Club of Lynn Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds South Shore Mental Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE PHYSICIANS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WORCESTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN INC ↗
- Who funds ELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc · DCU for Kids · Health Resources in Action Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Massachusetts Association for Mental Health Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Advocates Inc — 66% of income from government
- Riverside Community Care Inc — 58% of income from government
- South Shore Mental Health Center Inc — 46% of income from government
- Behavioral Health Network Inc — 28% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Club of Worcester Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Lynn Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.