Skip to content
Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy Inc

The alliance advocates statewide and mobilizes communities to prevent teen pregnancy, to increase opportunities for youth and young parents, and to empower young people to make healthy decisions about relationships, sex, parenting, and life.

$234k
Granted FY2018
13
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$234kPublic Benefit$81kEducation$74kHuman Services$21kYouth Development$17kCrime & Legal$2k
02FY2018 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $191,298, the rows itemized in this filing. The $233,607 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,309 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k8 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
$3,624
Median grant
1
States reached
$181k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH$87,784
CITY OF LAWRENCE$31,250
GREATER LAWRENCE TECHNICAL SCHOOL$30,000
YMCA OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD$20,000
SPRINGFIELD RENAISSANCE SCHOOL$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLYOKE$5,000
PHOENIX CHARTER ACADEMY$3,624
SI SE PUEDE INC$1,440
COMMUNITY DAY CARE OF LAWRENCE$700
MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN$700
HEALTH QUARTERS V$500
GREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$200
LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YMCA OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $20k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$428k · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$428k
$0

Still filing today

85%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    Institute for Community Health Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $216k · revenue +142%
  • GL
    GREATER LOWELL TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $67k · revenue +47% · 65% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLYOKE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +94%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Greater Lowell Health Alliance Chna 10 Inc

    To sustain a strategic alliance of community organizations that improves the overall health and wellness of those living in the greater lowell region. by raising awareness and providing resources for our communities, schools, civic and…

    Health
    2
    Children's Hospital Corporation

    Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

    Health
    3
    Greater Lowell Family Ymca

    The greater lowell family ymca's mission is to strengthen our community by supporting youth development, healthy living and social responsibility for all through programs influenced by our core values of caring, honesty, respect and…

    Human Services
    4
    Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

    Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

    Health
    5
    Greater New Bedford Community Health Center Inc

    To serve, educate, and inspire our patients in becoming more knowledgeable and participatory in their total health. to be a regional resource and leader focused on improving public health in the communities we serve.

    —
    6
    Laboure College of Healthcare Inc

    Laboure college provides high-quality education and prepares women and men for careers in nursing and allied health fields.

    —
    7
    Lowell Community Health Center Inc

    Lowell community health center's mission is to provide caring, quality, and culturally competent health services to the people of greater lowell, regardless of their financial status; to reduce health disparities and enhance the health of…

    Health
    8
    Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc

    To promote health access for all through leadership and programs supporting community health centers and members in achieving their goals of accessible, quality, comprehensive, and community-responsive health care. this mission emphasizes…

    —
    9
    Lynn Community Health Inc

    To provide comprehensive healthcare of the highest quality for everyone in the greater lynn community regardless of ability to pay.(continued on schedule o.)our strongest commitment is to assure access to care for underserved members of…

    —
    10
    Boys & Girls Club of Greater Billerica Inc

    To enable all young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

    Youth Development
    11
    Greater Lawrence Community Action Council Inc

    Greater lawrence community action council, inc. creates opportunities by collaborating with the community and empowering individuals to achieve their goals.

    —
    12
    Long Island Community Hospital At Nyu Langone Health

    The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Day Care Center of Lawrence Inc; the most unlike its peers is Si Se Puede Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    5
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/11
    Grantees still filing
    8/11
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Institute for Community Health Inc: $216,412 · HealthInstitute for Community Health Inc+2 more: $2,400 · HealthLAWRENCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $81,200 · OtherLAWRENCE PUBLIC SCHOOLSBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLYOKE INC: $15,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER …Springfield Public Library: $12,500 · OtherSpringfield Public Library+2 more: $4,205 · OtherGREATER LOWELL TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $67,100 · EducationGREATER LOWELL TECH…THE PHOENIX CHARTER ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $7,070 · EducationTHE PHOENIX CHARTER…YMCA of Greater Springfield Inc: $20,500 · Human ServicesMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN: $1,500 · Crime & LegalLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $400 · Youth Development
    Health$218,812Other$112,905Education$74,170Human Services$20,500Crime & Legal$1,500Youth Development$400

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInstitute for Community Health Inc: $216,412 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetGREATER LOWELL TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $67,100 over 2y, 65% of budgetYMCA of Greater Springfield Inc: $20,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLYOKE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE PHOENIX CHARTER ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $7,070 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSi Se Puede Inc: $2,705 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER OF LAWRENCE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHQUARTERS INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Boston Foundation IncEssex County Communit…Amelia Peabody Founda…United Way Of Massach…Eversource Energy Fou…Eastern Bank Foundati…Artemas W Stearns Tru…Josephine G Russell T…Project Bread-The Wal…The Beveridge Family …Nisource Charitable F…Good Sports Inc
    Boston Foundation IncMA22× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Amelia Peabody Foundation · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Artemas W Stearns Trust · Josephine G Russell Trust · Project Bread-The Walk for Hunger Inc · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Good Sports Inc

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
    • Healthquarters Inc: 66% of income from government
    • Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc: 31% of income from government
    • Institute for Community Health Inc: 22% of income from government
    • Community Day Care Center of Lawrence Inc: 9% of income from government
    • Si Se Puede Inc: 3% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    1rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home