Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mason and Lula Cole Charitable Tua 600008015

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$252k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$598kEducation$354kYouth Development$221kAnimals$208kHealth$198kFood & Nutrition$172kHuman Services$136kPhilanthropy$91kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $123k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $129k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Northern Neck - Middlesex Free Health$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE$15,000
SMITH POINT SEA RESCUE INC$15,000
WESTMORELAND PLAYERS$14,000
HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK$10,000
HAMPDEN SYDNEY COLLEGE$10,000
LANCASTER COUNTY VA EDUCATION FDN$10,000
RAPPAHANNOCK ART LEAGUE$10,000
RAPPAHANNOCK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS$10,000
YOUTH CLUB OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC$10,000
THE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC$10,000
THE RWC FOUNDATION$9,000
STEAMBOAT ERA MUSEUM$9,000
GREATER REEDVILLE ASSOCIATION INC$8,000
LANCASTER COMMUNITY LIBRARY$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%THE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%THE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%THE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%THE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%THE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%THE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%THE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 47 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +66% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
9

Total granted

$2.3M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+66%

Still filing today

51%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WESTMORELAND PLAYERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $143k · revenue +44%
  • SP
    SMITH POINT SEA RESCUE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $133k · revenue +120%
  • HH
    HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • DF
    DREAM FIELDS DBA YOUTH CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TH
    THE HAVEN SHELTER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern Shore Spca

Care and placement of unwanted animals on the eastern shore of virginia servicing accomack and northampton counties. providing temporary lodging and care to animals until placed while encouraging spaying and neutering.

Animals
2
Westmoreland County Museum & Library Inc

Preservation and promotion of the history, traditions, and culture of westmoreland county, virginia and preservation of historical records of the county.

—
3
Historic Virginia Land Conservancy

Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.

Environment
4
Chesterfield Historical Society

The society serves as the center for chesterfield county history. our mission is to collect, preserve, interpret and promote the countys unique past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations

Arts & Culture
5
Chesapeake Cats & Dogs Inc

Chesapeake Cats and Dogs CCAD is a lifetime haven and no-kill animal rescue organization dedicated to rehabilitating and providing a second chance for cats and dogs that have been abandoned, abused, lost, strayed, or surrendered.

Animals
6
Suffolk Nansemond Historical Society

The mission of the Suffolk-Nansemond Historical Society is to collect, preserve, interpret and promote awareness of the history and culture of Suffolk and old Nansemond County for the education and enjoyment of present and future…

—
7
Captain Avery Museum Inc

To collect, preserve, and share local chesapeake history celebrating the culture around the chesapeake bay - past, present, and future - through oral histories, collections, exhibitions, and community outreach.

Arts & Culture
8
Richardson Maritime Museum Incorporated

The organization is dedicated to preserving and promoting the wooden boatbuilding heritage of maryland's eastern shore with a museum and a wooden boatbuilding center.

Arts & Culture
9
Animal Welfare League of Frederick County Inc

Providing for animal welfare through rescue, education, and adoption in Frederick County Maryland.

Animals
10
The Humane Society of Shenandoah County Virginia Inc

Humane treatment of animals

Animals
11
Lunenburg Health Service Inc

To provide free public health and nursing care within Lunenburg County, Virginia.

Health
12
Westmoreland County Volunteer Rescue Squad Inc

Volunteer rescue squad - westmoreland county, va

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rappahannock Art League; the most unlike its peers is Bay Triangle Trail. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
23/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE: $195,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THESMITH POINT SEA RESCUE: $133,000 · OtherSMITH POINT SEA RESCUERAPPAHANNOCK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $123,000 · OtherRAPPAHANNOCK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTSTHE RWC FOUNDATION: $91,000 · OtherTHE RWC FOUNDATIONLANCASTER COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $64,000 · OtherLINK INCORPORATED: $52,000 · OtherNORTHERN NECK SAIL AND POWER SQUADRON: $47,600 · OtherLANCASTER VA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $46,000 · Other+34 more: $573,500 · Other+34 moreTHE WESTMORELAND PLAYERS: $143,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WESTMORELAND …RAPPAHANNOCK ART LEAGUE: $57,000 · Arts & CultureRAPPAHANNOCK ART …STEAMBOAT ERA MUSEUM INC: $48,000 · Arts & CultureSTEAMBOAT ERA MUS…NORTHERN NECK ORCHESTRA CORPORATION: $40,500 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN NECK ORC…Rappahannock Concert Association Inc: $33,700 · Arts & CultureRappahannock Conc…LANCASTER PLAYERS INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureLANCASTER PLAYERS…+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureLANCASTER COUNTY VIRGINIA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $102,250 · EducationLANCASTER C…HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $80,000 · EducationHAMPDEN-SYD…Chesapeake Academy Inc: $57,700 · EducationChesapeake …THE NORTHERN NECK-MIDDLESEX FREE HEALTH CLINIC INC: $148,000 · HealthHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $120,000 · Food & NutritionTHE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesGARFIELD S RESCUE INC: $24,000 · AnimalsTHE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF THE NORTHERN NECK INC: $17,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $15,700 · AnimalsLancova Partners for Pets Inc: $15,000 · Animals
Other$1,325,100Arts & Culture$350,700Education$239,950Health$148,000Food & Nutrition$120,000Human Services$80,000Animals$71,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NORTHERN NECK-MIDDLESEX FREE HEALTH CLINIC INC: $148,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WESTMORELAND PLAYERS: $143,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetSMITH POINT SEA RESCUE: $133,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $120,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY VIRGINIA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $102,250 over 9y, 11% of budgetTHE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $80,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChesapeake Academy Inc: $57,700 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK ART LEAGUE: $57,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetLINK INCORPORATED: $52,000 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetSTEAMBOAT ERA MUSEUM INC: $48,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetNORTHERN NECK ORCHESTRA CORPORATION: $40,500 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetLEGAL AID WORKS: $40,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHERN NECK LAND CONSERVANCY: $40,000 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetRappahannock Concert Association Inc: $33,700 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetLANCASTER PLAYERS INC: $28,000 over 4y, 29% of budgetGARFIELD S RESCUE INC: $24,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $20,000 over 3y, 48% of budgetBAY TRIANGLE TRAIL: $18,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetTHE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF THE NORTHERN NECK INC: $17,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetYOUTH CLUB OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC: $16,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE GREATER REEDVILLE ASSOCIATION: $16,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $15,700 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetLancova Partners for Pets Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetMorattico Waterfront Museum: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NORTHERN NECK-MIDDLESEX FREE HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WESTMORELAND PLAYERS ↗
  • Who funds SMITH POINT SEA RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY VIRGINIA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HAVEN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Chesapeake Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK ART LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LINK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds STEAMBOAT ERA MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN NECK ORCHESTRA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID WORKS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN NECK LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Rappahannock Concert Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GARFIELD S RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY TRIANGLE TRAIL ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF THE NORTHERN NECK INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH CLUB OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA40.4× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · The Nettie L and Charles L Wiley Foundation · Weston F Jr and Dorothy C Conley Family Charitable Foundation · Lancaster County Lions Foundation Inc · Ben Conley Charitable & Education Foundation · The Revere Family Foundation · Jessie Ball duPont Religious Charitable & Educational Fund · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mason and Lula Cole Charitable Tua 600008015 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mason and Lula Cole Charitable Tua 600008015. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mason and Lula Cole Charitable Tua 600008015’s filings →

    More from the funding graph