Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary V Duffy Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$107kHuman Services$29kReligion$16kHealth$8kInternational$6kEnvironment$4kCrime & Legal$3kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$240k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gift of Adoption Funds$5,000
CHO Foundation (Children Hispaniola Org)$5,000
Regina Dominican High School$5,000
Lawrence Hall$3,000
Our Lady of Tepeyac$2,500
Little Sisters of the PoorSt Marys Home$2,000
AMBAS (Womens Association of Barra de Santiago)$2,000
Police Chaplains Ministry$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COOL Ministries: $1k → 8%Concordia Place: $1k → 14%Concordia Place: $1k → 14%Concordia Place: $500 → 14%Howard Area Community Center: $2k → 14%Howard Area Community Center: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
IA
PA
CA
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$153k · 18 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$153k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+6%

Still filing today

33%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    Lawrence Hall
    5× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +56%
  • HA
    Howard Area Community Center
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue +25%
  • PC
    POLICE CHAPLAINS MINISTRY FUND
    2× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CV
    CHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +6%
  • TC
    Teen Challenge Illinois
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • GO
    Gift of Adoption
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Link Inc

Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…

Human Services
2
Association House of Chicago

Association house's mission is to advance each person's full participation in the life of their families, communities, and society. since 1899, we have served a vibrant, multicultural community. we used a trauma informed, culturally…

Human Services
3
Chicago Foundlings Home

The Home currently provides support to charitable organizations that provide care, education and other services in community-based settings to expectant mothers, mothers, infants and children. Additionally, the Home provides required…

Human Services
4
Illinois Institute for Children

Providing Social Services to Families including Child Care

Human Services
5
Presence Behavioral Health

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Cook County

CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.

Crime & Legal
7
Covenant House Chicago
—
8
Henry Booth House

The organization is organized to provide social services for children and families from Birth thru five years of age. Our mission is to "improve the quality of life for families in culturally and economically diverse Chicago communities by…

Human Services
9
The Children's Place Association

To build a secure and hopeful today so children facing health issues and poverty succeed tomorrow.

Human Services
10
Cornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago

Cornerstone Counseling empowers people to reach their spiritual, relational, and emotional potential through exceptional counseling and personal development services.

—
11
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
12
Covenant House Illinois Inc

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lawrence Hall; the most unlike its peers is Warren Majengo Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOSEPHINUM ACADEMY: $82,000 · OtherJOSEPHINUM ACADEMYREGINA DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL: $19,500 · OtherREGINA DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOLMisericordia: $7,000 · OtherLawrence Hall: $6,500 · Other+22 more: $50,300 · Other+22 moreHoward Area Community Center: $2,500 · Human ServicesCONCORDIA PLACE: $2,500 · Human ServicesCOOL MINISTRIES: $1,000 · Human ServicesPOLICE CHAPLAINS MINISTRY FUND: $2,500 · ReligionSARAH'S CIRCLE: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterKICKING IT BACK INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWarren Majengo Foundation: $500 · International
Other$165,300Human Services$6,000Religion$2,500Housing & Shelter$1,000Philanthropy$1,000International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLawrence Hall: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR CHICAGO ST MARY'S HOME: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetECOVIVA NFP: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION: $3,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHoward Area Community Center: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE CHAPLAINS MINISTRY FUND: $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONCORDIA PLACE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTeen Challenge Illinois: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetESPERANZA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKICKING IT BACK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOOL MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALBANY PARK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWarren Majengo Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lawrence Hall ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR CHICAGO ST MARY'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds ECOVIVA NFP ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Howard Area Community Center ↗
  • Who funds POLICE CHAPLAINS MINISTRY FUND ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Teen Challenge Illinois ↗
  • Who funds SARAH'S CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds KICKING IT BACK INC ↗
  • Who funds COOL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ALBANY PARK COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Warren Majengo Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George O'Brien & Joseph Linberg Charitable FoundationIL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George O'Brien & Joseph Linberg Charitable Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation · Garnetta Kramer Charitable Foundation · WP & HB White Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Valerye H McCarthy Charitable Foundation · Benjamin & Bettina Van Cleave Charitable Foundation · Guy a & N Kay Arboit Charitable Trust · Harry F Chaddick and Elaine Chaddick Foundation Inc · Dr Scholl Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary V Duffy Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary V Duffy Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mary V Duffy Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mary V Duffy Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary V Duffy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph