Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Sage Unitrust Xxxxx1004

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$149kHuman Services$124kReligion$27kAnimals$24kInternational$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$21k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,842
Median grant
6
States reached
$733k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$2,842
CARE INC$2,842
PROJECT HOPE CENTER$2,842
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$2,842
SHENANGO VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER$2,842
HEART ASSOCIATION NATIONAL BEQUEST CENTER$2,842
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,842
CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,842
PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND$2,842
PASSAVANT HEALTH CENTER$2,842
MERCER CNTY ASSN FOR THE RETARDED$2,842
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MERCER COUNTY$2,842
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,842
GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES$2,842
ST PAUL'S HOME FOR THE AGING$2,842
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$369k · 16 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
0

Total granted

$369k
$0

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +81%
  • GR
    GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +51%
  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +36%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Reading Hospital

    Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

    Health
    2
    Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

    Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

    Health
    3
    The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

    Animals
    4
    Philhaven

    Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

    Health
    5
    Chambersburg Hospital

    The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

    Health
    6
    The Good Samaritan Hospital of Lebanon Pennsylvania

    The good samaritan hospital is a tax-exempt organization dedicated to providing high-quality, compassionate healthcare that improves the overall health of the community.

    Health
    7
    Holy Redeemer Health System

    As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.

    Health
    8
    The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

    Health
    9
    Lehigh Valley Hospital

    Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

    Health
    10
    Lehigh Valley Hospital - Pocono

    Our mission is who we are and what we do: to provide world class care close to home. our vision is what we aim for to best serve our community: to build a healthier community.

    Health
    11
    Sentara Princess Anne Hospital

    As part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day.

    Health
    12
    Sentara Enterprises

    As part of sentara health's integrated health care organization, we improve health everyday through the provision of health care facilities and services for sick, injured, disabled, indigent, and aged persons.

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pennsylvania Association for the Blind; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    8/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $27,114 · OtherCHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCHPROJECT HOPE CENTER: $26,817 · OtherPROJECT HOPE CENTERMERCER CNTY ASSN FOR THE RETARDED: $26,796 · OtherMERCER CNTY ASSN FOR THE RETARDEDPENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $25,647 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLINDTHE SALVATION ARMY: $24,180 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPASSAVANT HEALTH CENTER: $24,180 · OtherPASSAVANT HEALTH CENTERST PAUL'S HOME FOR THE AGING: $24,180 · OtherST PAUL'S HOME FOR THE AGINGAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $24,180 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCHEART ASSOCIATION: $13,170 · OtherHEART ASSOCIATIONGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $24,180 · Human ServicesGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SE…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $24,180 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $21,247 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red…CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MERCER COUNTY: $24,180 · HealthCHILDREN'S…American Heart Association Inc: $11,010 · HealthAmerican H…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $24,180 · InternationalSHENANGO VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER: $24,180 · Animals
    Other$216,264Human Services$69,607Health$35,190International$24,180Animals$24,180

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $25,647 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $24,180 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $24,180 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $24,180 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER OF MERCER COUNTY: $24,180 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetSHENANGO VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER: $24,180 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $21,247 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $11,010 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND ↗
    • Who funds GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES ↗
    • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
    • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MERCER COUNTY ↗
    • Who funds SHENANGO VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
    • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Mary Sage Unitrust Xxxxx1004 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Sage Unitrust Xxxxx1004. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Mary Sage Unitrust Xxxxx1004’s filings →

      More from the funding graph