Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Ok

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$269k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$542kEducation$520kRecreation & Sports$320kArts & Culture$230kHuman Services$112kReligion$83kPublic Benefit$49kCommunity Improvement$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $134k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL RENO PUBLIC SCHOOLS$68,996
EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS$65,000
EL RENO MAIN STREET$28,550
LORD'S HARVEST$17,320
US CALVALRY ASSOCIATION$13,000
EL RENO SPORTSMAN CLUB$10,000
MOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO$10,000
WESLEY METHODIST CHURCH$9,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$9,000
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$6,000
LOVE FOR THE CHILDRENS CENTER$5,000
SACRED HEART CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
ONPOINT SPORTS ASSOCIATION$4,825
VFW POST 382$4,772
EL RENO OPTIMIST CLUB$3,460
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $338k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS: $65k → 9%EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS: $50k → 9%EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS: $25k → 9%EL RENO BLESSINGS BASKETS INC: $25k → 9%EL RENO BLESSINGS BASKETS: $25k → 9%EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC: $25k → 9%EL RENO BLESSINGS BASKETS INC: $25k → 9%MOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO INC: $24k → 9%MOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO INC: $20k → 9%EL RENO BLESSINGS BASKETS INC: $20k → 9%EL RENO BLESSINGS BASKETS INC: $12k → 9%MOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO: $10k → 9%EL RENO BLESSINGS BASKETS INC: $10k → 9%RUSSEL MURRAY HOSPICE: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 42% of Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Ok’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 57%.

Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Oklessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 27 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
29

Total granted

$1.7M
$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

22%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $282k · revenue +3% · 28% of their budget
  • LH
    LORDS HARVEST INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $63k · revenue +58%
  • ER
    El Reno Public School Foundation Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • BB
    BLESSING BASKETS
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • CO
    CITY OF EL RENO
    one grant, 2020 · $49k
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION
    one grant, 2020 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
N Las Vegas Memorial Post Number 10047 Veterans of

To provide a meeting place for veterans

—
2
Muleshoe Meals On Wheels Inc

The Muleshoe Meals on Wheels purpose is to engage in all activities necessary, useful, or expedient, through operative measures and active organizations, to promote and further the interests of the Senior citizens of the area. The purpose…

—
3
Dept of Nevada Veterans of Foreign Wars of Us

Veterans Service Organization

Public Benefit
4
American Legion Post 205

Perform Honor Services; Operate a food and beverage services for members.

Public Benefit
5
Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 5365

To provide a social environment and support to Veterans of Foreign Wars.

—
6
Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 347 I

Provide american military veterans of foreign wars refreshments during meetings and other organizational functions

—
7
Nevada Veterans Coalition

We support northern nevada veterans cemetery

—
8
El Reno Elks Lodge NO743

Charity for Veterans

—
9
American Legion Beavercreek Mem Post 763

Providing for the social welfare and assisting needy and disabled veterans, or orphans of deceased veterans

—
10
Helping Hands for the Elderly

Meals for the elderly of crockett county, texas

Food & Nutrition
11
American Legion Post 7 Reed Gregory

Enhance the well-being of americas vets

—
12
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States Department of Ohio

Support of veterans

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Russell-Murray Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Legion Post 34 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EL RENO PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $543,665 · OtherEL RENO PUBLIC SCHOOLSEL RENO MAIN STREET: $124,050 · OtherEL RENO MAIN STREETEL RENO OPTIMIST CLUB: $89,477 · OtherEL RENO OPTIMIST CLUBU S CAVALRY ASSOCIATION: $60,500 · OtherEL RENO MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $59,000 · Other+48 more: $692,388 · Other+48 moreEL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC: $282,000 · Human ServicesEL RENO BLESSING BA…MOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO INC: $54,250 · Human ServicesMOBILE MEALS OF EL …+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesLORDS HARVEST INC: $63,097 · Food & NutritionHISTORIC FORT RENO INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureEl Reno Public School Foundation Inc: $5,500 · EducationPARTNERSHIP FOR HEALTHY CENTRAL COMMUNITIES INC: $5,000 · HealthGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $4,259 · Youth Development
Other$1,569,080Human Services$338,250Food & Nutrition$63,097Arts & Culture$20,000Education$5,500Health$5,000Youth Development$4,259

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC: $282,000 over 5y, 28% of budgetLORDS HARVEST INC: $63,097 over 4y, 13% of budgetU S CAVALRY ASSOCIATION: $60,500 over 4y, 42% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO INC: $54,250 over 2y, 21% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 5263: $8,898 over 2y, 15% of budgetEl Reno Public School Foundation Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR HEALTHY CENTRAL COMMUNITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 34 INC: $4,600 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $4,259 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRUSSELL-MURRAY HOSPICE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC ↗
  • Who funds LORDS HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds U S CAVALRY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC FORT RENO INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 5263 ↗
  • Who funds El Reno Public School Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gemini Industries Inc FoundationOK22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gemini Industries Inc Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · United Way of Canadian County Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Ok funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Ok. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    9get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Ok?

    Find your warmest path to Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Ok through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Ok’s filings →

    More from the funding graph