Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Jo Williams Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$329k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$89k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$795kHuman Services$518kEnvironment$450kFood & Nutrition$308kHealth$225kPhilanthropy$225kArts & Culture$60kYouth Development$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $189k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARDEN CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION$88,574
EMMAUS HOUSE$50,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY KANSAS CHAPTER$50,000
FINNEY COUNTY SENIOR CENTER MEALS ON WHEELS$32,200
GENESIS FAMILY HEALTH$25,000
FINNEY COUNTY UNITED WAY$25,000
KANSAS FOOD BANK$25,000
CASA$15,000
TURNING POINT ACADEMY$8,750
GARDEN CITY PIANO TEACHERS LEAGUE$2,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$2,500
REAL MEN REAL LEADERS$2,500
FINNEY COUNTY MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%RUSSELL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $17k → 12%RUSSELL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $16k → 12%REAL MEN REAL LEADERS: $3k → 12%REAL MEN REAL LEADERS: $3k → 12%REAL MEN REAL LEADERS: $3k → 12%REAL MEN REAL LEADERS: $3k → 12%REAL MEN REAL LEADERS: $3k → 12%REAL MEN REAL LEADERS: $3k → 12%REAL MEN REAL LEADERS: $3k → 12%REAL MEN REAL LEADERS: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 18 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$2.5M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-1%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    EMMAUS HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $380k · revenue +27%
  • GC
    GARDEN CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $368k · revenue +51%
  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LEE RICHARDSON ZOO INC
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Insurance & Financial Services Education Foundation
Education
2
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
3
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
4
Kansas City Country Club

The kansas city country club is a traditional, private, family-oriented country club dedicated to providing outstanding year-round dining, social and athletic activities to its members and their guests through superior services, staff and…

—
5
Kansas City Community Gardens Inc

Kansas city community gardens is dedicated to improving the quality of life of low-income households and other members of the community by helping them grow their own nutritious fruits and vegatables. the member gardners develop…

Environment
6
Garden City Real Estate Professionals Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
7
Kanza Mental Health and Guidance Center Inc

Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.

Health
8
Kansas Farmers Union Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
9
Kansas Children's Discovery Center Inc

The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.

Arts & Culture
10
Kansas City Credit Union

Educate members, advise decisions, finance needs, and invest in community

—
11
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
—
12
Western Kansas Community Foundation

Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Methodist Western Kansas Mexican- American Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Turning Point Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EMMAUS HOUSE INC: $380,000 · OtherEMMAUS HOUSE INCGC COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $377,722 · OtherGC COMMUNITY COLLEGENATURE CONSERVANCY KANSAS CHAPTER: $350,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY KANSAS CHAPTERFINNEY COUNTY SENIOR CENTER MEALS ON WHEELS: $282,700 · OtherFINNEY COUNTY SENIOR CENTER MEALS ON WHEELSUNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INC: $225,000 · OtherUNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INCFINNEY COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $225,000 · OtherFINNEY COUNTY UNITED WAY INCCASA: $105,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 · Other+6 more: $62,849 · OtherGARDEN CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION: $367,927 · EducationGARDEN CITY COMMU…Turning Point Academy Inc: $49,750 · EducationTurning Point Aca…THE RUSSELL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesREAL MEN REAL LEADERS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF LEE RICHARDSON ZOO INC: $30,000 · AnimalsKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionTUMBLEWEED FESTIVAL INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,108,271Education$417,677Human Services$53,000Animals$30,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMMAUS HOUSE INC: $380,000 over 9y, 17% of budgetGARDEN CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION: $367,927 over 4y, 10% of budgetUNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INC: $225,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetFINNEY COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $225,000 over 9y, 9.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTurning Point Academy Inc: $49,750 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetTHE RUSSELL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $33,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF LEE RICHARDSON ZOO INC: $30,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREAL MEN REAL LEADERS INC: $20,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetKANZA Society Inc: $10,989 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTUMBLEWEED FESTIVAL INC: $10,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMMAUS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FINNEY COUNTY UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Turning Point Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE RUSSELL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LEE RICHARDSON ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds REAL MEN REAL LEADERS INC ↗
  • Who funds KANZA Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds TUMBLEWEED FESTIVAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Western Kansas Community FoundationKS24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Western Kansas Community Foundation · Finnup Foundation · Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Foundation Inc · Kansas Health Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Jo Williams Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Jo Williams Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Jo Williams’ filings →

    More from the funding graph