· Private foundation
Mary Jo Williams Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $122k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $189k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GARDEN CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION | $88,574 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY KANSAS CHAPTER | $50,000 |
| EMMAUS HOUSE | $50,000 |
| FINNEY COUNTY SENIOR CENTER MEALS ON WHEELS | $32,200 |
| FINNEY COUNTY UNITED WAY | $25,000 |
| KANSAS FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| GENESIS FAMILY HEALTH | $25,000 |
| CASA | $15,000 |
| TURNING POINT ACADEMY | $8,750 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $2,500 |
| GARDEN CITY PIANO TEACHERS LEAGUE | $2,500 |
| REAL MEN REAL LEADERS | $2,500 |
| FINNEY COUNTY MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EHEMMAUS HOUSE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $380k · revenue +27%
- GCGARDEN CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION4× · 2022–2025 · $368k · revenue +51%
- UMUNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF LEE RICHARDSON ZOO INCone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.
The kansas city country club is a traditional, private, family-oriented country club dedicated to providing outstanding year-round dining, social and athletic activities to its members and their guests through superior services, staff and…
Kansas city community gardens is dedicated to improving the quality of life of low-income households and other members of the community by helping them grow their own nutritious fruits and vegatables. the member gardners develop…
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.
Educate members, advise decisions, finance needs, and invest in community
Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Methodist Western Kansas Mexican- American Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Turning Point Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EMMAUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GARDEN CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds FINNEY COUNTY UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Turning Point Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds THE RUSSELL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LEE RICHARDSON ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds REAL MEN REAL LEADERS INC ↗
- Who funds KANZA Society Inc ↗
- Who funds TUMBLEWEED FESTIVAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Western Kansas Community Foundation · Finnup Foundation · Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Foundation Inc · Kansas Health Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mary Jo Williams Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.