Loading…
· Private foundation
MARY GOLDING TRUST OF ST CATHERINE
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$12k
Granted FY2026
6
Grants
3
Communities
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of MARY GOLDING TRUST OF ST CATHERINE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
summitchurch
2021
food bank
2022
palm beachsummit
2023
palm beach
2024
tree villagepalm beachchurch
2026
saint
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2026 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- Saint Paul of the Cross Church$3,500
- St Teresa Chruch$2,500
- Saint John Fisher University$2,500
- Jupiter Medical Center Foundation$2,500
- South Florida PGA Foundation$500
- Lost Tree Chapel$500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 99% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$79k · 14 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2026, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
14
41
Total granted
$79k
$56k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+40%
-4%
Still filing today
36%
10%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JMJupiter Medical Center3× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +89%
- JMJupiter Medical Center Foundation2× · 2020–2026 · $5k · revenue +35%
Fairfield University2× · 2021–2023 · $4k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- TEThe Epiphany Schoolone grant, 2020 · $5k
- SPSt Paul of the Cross Churchone grant, 2024 · $5k
- STSt Teresa of Avila Churchone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Jacksonville University
The mission of Jacksonville University is to prepare each student for life-long learning, achieving, leading, and serving.
Education
2
St John's University New York
St. john's university is a catholic, vincentian, metropolitan, and global institution of higher education.
Education
3
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Education
4
Mount St Joseph University
Mount st. joseph university is a catholic academic community grounded in the spiritual values and vision of its founders, the sisters of charity. the university educates its students through interdisciplinary liberal arts and professional…
Education
5
Saint Joseph's College
While the college suspended all operations in 2017 due to financial challenges, the college has resumed educational aspects in educational certification programs. the mission that the college has faithfully upheld for over 100 years of…
Education
6
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital at
The organization provides medically necessary healthcare services to all individuals in a non-discriminatory manner.
Health
7
St Jude Hospital
See schedule oas expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
Health
8
University of Saint Joseph
The university provides a rigorous liberal arts & professional education for a diverse student population in an inclusive environment that encourages strong ethical values, personal integrity, and a sense of responsibility to the needs of…
Education
9
Providence St Joseph Medical Center
As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
Health
10
Tufts Medical Center Physicians
The tufts medical center physicians organization, inc. coordinates the administrative and billing activities for the group practices in their mission of providing quality health care services to patients of tufts medical center, inc. and…
Health
11
St James Healthcare
We reveal and foster god's healing love by improving the health of the people and communities we serve, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
Health
12
Fjc
To support the nonprofit sector through donor advised funds, fiscal sponsorship, nonprofit lending, and customized philanthropic solutions.
Crime & Legal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is St John Fisher University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$122,950Education$8,000Health$7,250Philanthropy$4,500Food & Nutrition$1,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MARY GOLDING TRUST OF ST CATHERINE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Summit Football Alumni Assoc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 223249544 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Summit Football Alumni Assoc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Mary Golding Trust of St Catherine?
Find your warmest path to Mary Golding Trust of St Catherine through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines