Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Elizabeth Ober Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$237kEducation$119kArts & Culture$92kReligion$42kRecreation & Sports$30kHousing & Shelter$30kHealth$28kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $65k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROWN COUNTY PLAYHOUSE$15,000
HILLTOP CHRISTIAN CAMP$10,000
REILLY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$10,000
REACH COLUMBUS$10,000
SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC$10,000
ST PETER'S LUTHERAN CHURCH SCHOOL$10,000
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL$8,800
AREA 10 COUNCIL ON AGING$7,500
LOVE CHAPEL ECUMENICAL ASSEMBLY OF$4,000
OGILVILLE CHURCH DAYCARE$4,000
WFHBBLOOMINGTON COMMUNITY RADIO$3,500
GOD'S GRACE INC$3,000
JOY'S HOUSE ADULT DAY SERVICES$2,500
MORNING DOVE THERAPEUTIC RIDING$2,400
CROWN HILL FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $244k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%91 PLACE: $10k → 16%91 PLACE: $10k → 16%HILLTOP CHRISTIAN CAMP: $10k → 13%91 PLACE: $10k → 16%HILLTOP CHRISTIAN CAMP: $10k → 13%AREA 10 COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 18%SHEPARD COMMUNITY: $44k → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC: $32k → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC: $30k → 16%HILLTOP CHRISTIAN CAMP: $5k → 13%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC: $30k → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC: $10k → 16%HILLTOP CHRISTIAN CAMP: $5k → 13%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC: $10k → 16%REACH COLUMBUS: $10k → 13%REACH COLUMBUS: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$545k · 16 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$545k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
-3%

Still filing today

44%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Shepherd Community Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $156k · revenue +52%
  • HC
    Hilltop Christian Camp Inc
    4× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +110%
  • 9P
    91 PLACE INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue ×14

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PETERS LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • RC
    RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • OC
    OGILVILLE CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Teen Challenge Inc

Residential Faith-based drug and alcohol recovery.

—
2
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
3
Indiana Co Child Day Care Program

Teaming with families to provide high quality child care and education services for all children.

Human Services
4
Just Friends Inc

Supports independence by providing a comfortable, familiar environment for socialization, physical /mental exercise, creative exploration, nursing supervision, and community engagement.

Human Services
5
Elevate Indianapolis Inc

Our mission is to build long-term, life-changing relationships with Indianapolis urban youth, equipping them to thrive and contribute to their community

Education
6
Metropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc

Trusted journalism, inspiring stories and lifelong learning.

Arts & Culture
7
Hope Community Development Corporation of Indiana

The mission of The Hope Community Development Corporation is to develop faith, caring, and sustainable neighborhoods through quality affordable housing and diverse supportive services for residents

Housing & Shelter
8
Kipp Indianapolis Inc

KIPP Indy is a network of tuition-free, open-enrollment, college preparatory, public charter schools. KIPP Indy's mission is to create a network of schools that provides educationally underserved children with a rigorous education that…

Education
9
The Arc of Indiana Inc

The arc of indiana is committed to all people with intellectual and developmental disabilities realizing their goals of living, learning, working and fully participating in the community.

Human Services
10
Community Action of East Central Indiana

To provide education and assistance to low income, disadvantaged individuals and children.

Human Services
11
Communities in Schools Indiana

Surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Youth Development
12
Indiana Family to Family

Indiana family to family (inf2f) is a unique statewide family-led organization that provides information, training, and peer support to caregivers of children and youth with special health care needs (cyshcn) and the professionals who…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 91 Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ready to Read Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROWN COUNTY PLAYHOUSE: $79,000 · OtherBROWN COUNTY PLAYHOUSEREILLY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherREILLY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONST PETER'S LUTHERAN CHURCH SCHOOL: $38,000 · OtherST PETER'S LUTHERAN CHURCH SCHOOLFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL: $30,800 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH PRESCHOOLOGILVILLE CHURCH DAYCARE: $20,300 · OtherOGILVILLE CHURCH DAYCAREGODS GRACE INC: $15,000 · OtherLOVE CHAPEL ECUMENICAL ASSEMBLY OF: $12,000 · Other+10 more: $38,750 · Other+10 moreShepherd Community Inc: $156,250 · Human ServicesShepherd Community IncHilltop Christian Camp Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesHilltop Christian Camp Inc91 PLACE INC: $30,000 · Human Services91 PLACE INCREACH COLUMBUS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesREACH COLUMBUS INC+1 more: $7,500 · Human ServicesCOLLEGE MENTORS FOR KIDS INC: $20,000 · EducationHUTSON SCHOOL INC DBA FORTUNE ACADEMY: $19,500 · EducationREADY TO READ INC: $3,100 · EducationMorning Dove Therapeutic Riding Inc: $2,400 · EducationBloomington Community Radio Inc dba WFHB: $12,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$283,850Human Services$243,750Education$45,000Arts & Culture$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetShepherd Community Inc: $156,250 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHilltop Christian Camp Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budget91 PLACE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetREACH COLUMBUS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOLLEGE MENTORS FOR KIDS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHUTSON SCHOOL INC DBA FORTUNE ACADEMY: $19,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBloomington Community Radio Inc dba WFHB: $12,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAREA 10 COUNCIL ON AGING OF MONROE AND OWEN COUNTIES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREADY TO READ INC: $3,100 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Shepherd Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hilltop Christian Camp Inc ↗
  • Who funds 91 PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds REACH COLUMBUS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE MENTORS FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUTSON SCHOOL INC DBA FORTUNE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Bloomington Community Radio Inc dba WFHB ↗
  • Who funds AREA 10 COUNCIL ON AGING OF MONROE AND OWEN COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds READY TO READ INC ↗
  • Who funds Morning Dove Therapeutic Riding Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Indiana Community Foundation IncIN13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Elizabeth Ober Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Elizabeth Ober Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mary Elizabeth Ober Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mary Elizabeth Ober Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Elizabeth Ober’s filings →

    More from the funding graph