Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary E Van Drew Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$105kHealth$81kReligion$75kFood & Nutrition$55kInternational$35kYouth Development$30kArts & Culture$12kHousing & Shelter$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MATTHEW 25 HEALTH AND DEN$9,000
MEDICAL MISSIONARIES$6,000
THE BVM FOUNDATION MOTHER OF MERCY$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$5,000
WOMENS CARE CENTER$4,500
FRANCISCAN CENTER INC$3,500
TURNSTONE CENTER FOR DISABLED CHILD$3,500
ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CH SOUP$3,500
BOYS TOWN$3,000
EDMUNDITE MISSIONS$3,000
CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH$3,000
CATHOLIC FOREIGN MISSIONS$2,500
HOUSE OF MERCY$2,500
FOOD FOR THE POOR$2,000
42 STRONG$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BETTER WAY DETROIT: $2k → 21%BETTER WAY DETROIT: $2k → 21%BETTER WAY DETROIT: $2k → 21%BETTER WAY DETROIT: $2k → 21%BETTER WAY DETROIT: $2k → 21%BETTER WAY DETROIT: $2k → 21%FRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $6k → 12%FRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $4k → 12%FRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $4k → 12%SCAN INC: $500 → 12%SCAN INC: $500 → 12%SCAN INC: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
MO
VA
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$408k · 27 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
6

Total granted

$408k
$6k

Still filing today

37%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthReligionFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    Medical Missionaries Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +44%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +115%
  • FC
    FRANCISCAN CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • BO
    BASILICA OF THE NATIONAL SHRINE
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • AS
    ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Franciscan Ministries Inc

Create positive change in the lives of those we serve.

Human Services
2
Divine Mercy Ministries Inc

Divine Mercy Ministries, Inc. is a Christian maternity home for women 18 years of age and older facing unexpected pregnancies. Open to women of all faiths, it provides a loving and nurturing environment to meet the spiritual, physical,…

Religion
3
Mother Teresa Shelter Inc

To provide comprehensive, community-based outreach services to homeless individuals and families, by creating opportunities that will help break the cycle of homelessness.

—
4
Franciscan Charities

Franciscan charities, inc. is a not-for profit organization located in newark, new jersey which was organized and operates to tend to the critical needs of the poor, provide tools to rise above poverty and support physical, emotional and…

Human Services
5
St Margaret's Daughters Home Attn Larry Stansberry

St. margaret's is a faith-based organization that provides quality nursing care to the poor.

—
6
Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc

The mission of Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community in…

Food & Nutrition
7
Divine Mission for the Poor Inc
—
8
Hartford Catholic Worker Inc

The mission of Hartford Catholic Worker is to practice the works of mercy. We do this through our work with children and families in our neighborhood, helping to make sure the hungry are fed and helping secure housing for the homeless.

International
9
Ministerio Los Milagros De Jesus Inc

To provide charitable services such as food and shelter to the needy and poor of the city of lawrence and surrounding communities

Religion
10
Catholic Charities West Michigan

Inspired by the church's social teachings, catholic charities west michigan fosters individuals and families to flourish by providing help and creating hope.

—
11
Catholic Charities Indianapolis Inc

The staff and volunteers of Catholic Charities Indianapolis are called by the Gospel to uphold the dignity of all people. Guided by Catholic social teaching, we consider it a privilege to deliver compassionate and caring service to help…

—
12
House of Mercy Incorporated

To provide food, clothing, and shelter to homeless and abandoned individuals and families

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Iris Family Support Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MATTHEW 25 HEALTH AND DEN: $50,000 · OtherMATTHEW 25 HEALTH AND DENRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $28,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSETHE BVM FOUNDATION MOTHER OF MERCY: $26,500 · OtherTHE BVM FOUNDATION MOTHER OF MERCYTURNSTONE CENTER FOR DISABLED CHILD: $19,500 · OtherTURNSTONE CENTER FOR DISABLED CHILDCATHOLIC FOREIGN MISSIONS: $17,500 · OtherCATHOLIC FOREIGN MISSIONSCROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC: $17,500 · OtherCROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH INCST MARY'S CATHOLIC CH SOUP: $17,500 · OtherST MARY'S CATHOLIC CH SOUPBOYS TOWN: $17,000 · OtherBOYS TOWNFATHERS OF ST EDMUND SOUTHERN MISSIONS INC: $14,500 · OtherDAMAR SVCS INC: $11,500 · OtherFORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC: $11,500 · OtherMCMILLEN HEALTH: $11,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES USA: $11,000 · Other+11 more: $31,500 · Other+11 moreMedical Missionaries Inc: $35,000 · InternationalMedical Miss…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $11,500 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE…FRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesFRANCISCA…BETTER WAY DETROIT: $11,500 · Human ServicesBETTER WA…IRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $25,500 · HealthLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR IN RICHMOND: $6,000 · HealthHOUSE OF MERCY: $12,000 · Religion42STRONG: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY ACTION LIFE LINE INC: $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$284,500International$46,500Human Services$33,000Health$31,500Religion$12,000Youth Development$4,000Food & Nutrition$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMedical Missionaries Inc: $35,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $25,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSE OF MERCY: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $11,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBETTER WAY DETROIT: $11,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR IN RICHMOND: $6,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budget42STRONG: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION LIFE LINE INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetIRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Medical Missionaries Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds BETTER WAY DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR IN RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds 42STRONG ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION LIFE LINE INC ↗
  • Who funds IRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary E Van Drew Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary E Van Drew Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mary E Van Drew Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mary E Van Drew Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary E Van Drew’s filings →

More from the funding graph