Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Bradof Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$175k
Granted FY2021
16
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of Mary Bradof Foundation Inc’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Idaho Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Mary Bradof Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $175k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
13
’18
13
’19
10
’20
12
’21
3
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Animals$205kHuman Services$190kFood & Nutrition$176kEducation$147kPhilanthropy$105kArts & Culture$12kHealth$8kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2021 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k9 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $138k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANIMALS IN DISTRESS ASSOCIATION$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC$28,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
WYAKIN WARRIOR FOUNDATION$15,000
MCPAWS$10,000
INTERPARISH MINISTRY$10,000
CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES INC$5,000
SALVATION ARMY OF BOISE$5,000
GOODING PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
TETON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
WOMEN AWARE INC$5,000
WYLER BOY'S AND GIRL'S CLUB OF CINCINNATI$3,000
ADOPT-A-BOOK$3,000
FAMILY ADVOCATES PROGRAM INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 9%WOMEN AWARE INC: $5k → 8%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 9%WOMEN AWARE INC: $5k → 8%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 9%WOMEN AWARE INC: $3k → 8%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 9%WOMEN AWARE INC: $2k → 8%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 9%WOMEN AWARE INC: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Mary Bradof Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mary Bradof Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$721k · 21 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down. Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
8

Total granted

$721k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+640%

Still filing today

57%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $138k · revenue +48%
  • AI
    ANIMALS IN DISTRESS ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $105k · revenue +62%
  • WW
    WYAKIN WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $90k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • ME
    MACKAY ELEMENTRY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • MS
    MERIDIAN SENIOR CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +239%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Animal Rescue Network

Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…

Animals
2
Advocates 4 Animals Pet Food Pantry

Advocates 4 Animals A4A Pet Pantry is a 100% volunteer 501c3 nonprofit dedicated to keeping animals with their families during financial hardship by providing pet food and spay-neuter assistance. We also operate an adoption program caring…

Animals
3
Idaho Humane Society Inc

The mission of the Idaho Humane Society (IHS) is to advocate for the welfare and responsible care of animals, protect them from neglect and cruelty, and promote humane education, awareness and compassion for all living creatures.

Animals
4
Flemington Area Food Pantry Inc

Our mission is to promote the health and well-being of our Hunterdon County community. We offer choices of nutritious foods and essentials, foster resource connections, provide tailored programming, and respect the dignity of our neighbors…

Human Services
5
Grateful Paws

Grateful Paws NJ is a non-profit organization devoted to rescuing stray and abandoned animals throughout New Jersey, providing medical care and helping them to find new homes.

Animals
6
Beaverhead Animal Shelter

The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.

Animals
7
Friends of Franklin County Indiana Animal Shelter

Friends of Franklin County Indiana Animal Shelter is dedicated to providing shelter, care, medical support, and adoption services for stray, surrendered, and homeless dogs and other animals in Franklin County, Indiana. The organization…

Animals
8
Animals in Distress Inc

Provides shelter, food, veterinary services and medicine for abandoned and stray cats. No cats are euthanized. All are placed in homes, foster homes or remain at the shelter.

Animals
9
Interfaith Food Ministry Nevada County

A community where no one should feel the hurt of hunger. Interfaith Food Ministry feeds the hungry and works to reduce food insecurity in Nevada County. We help to sustain health, human dignity and the opportunity for individuals to…

Food & Nutrition
10
Valley Humane SocietyInc

Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…

Animals
11
Animal Friends of North Central Wv

Prevention of cruelty to animals through advocacy and community in need. reduction and eventual elimination of the killing of cats and dogs by actively promoting.

Animals
12
Purrs and Whiskers Inc

Purrs and Whiskers primary function is to find forever homes for cats and kittens that are abandoned, stray, owner turn in, injured/sick, and/or born in feral colonies after we have fully vetted them by spaying/neutering, vaccinating,…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Advocate Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Capic-Cat Adoption and Pet Information Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientInter Parish Ministry Inc: $33,000 · OtherInter Parish Ministry IncGOODING PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF BOISE: $13,000 · Other+13 more: $66,000 · Other+13 moreANIMALS IN DISTRESS ASSOCIATION INC: $105,000 · AnimalsANIMALS IN DISTRESS…MCPAWS INC: $32,000 · AnimalsMCPAWS INCPets in Need of Greater Cincinnati Inc: $8,000 · AnimalsPets in Need of Gre…+1 more: $4,500 · AnimalsIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $138,000 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOODBANK WAR…IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $104,604 · PhilanthropyIDAHO COMMUNIT…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWYAKIN WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · EducationWYAKIN WARRIO…EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC: $15,000 · EducationEDUCATION FOU…Clermont Senior Services Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN AWARE INC: $15,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC: $5,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$310,500Animals$149,500Food & Nutrition$138,000Philanthropy$105,604Education$105,000Human Services$40,500Crime & Legal$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $138,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetANIMALS IN DISTRESS ASSOCIATION INC: $105,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $104,604 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWYAKIN WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetInter Parish Ministry Inc: $33,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMCPAWS INC: $32,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetClermont Senior Services Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN AWARE INC: $15,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLILLIAN VALLELY SCHOOL INC: $9,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPets in Need of Greater Cincinnati Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGOODING RESTORATION FOR ENTERTAIN- MENT ARTS & THEATER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetFRANKLIN TOWNSHIP FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEISER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ANIMALS IN DISTRESS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WYAKIN WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Inter Parish Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds MCPAWS INC ↗
  • Who funds Clermont Senior Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN AWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds LILLIAN VALLELY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Pets in Need of Greater Cincinnati Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODING RESTORATION FOR ENTERTAIN- MENT ARTS & THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CAPIC-CAT ADOPTION AND PET INFORMATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WEISER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Bradof Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Bradof Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • Women Aware Inc: 43% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mary Bradof Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mary Bradof Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Bradof’s filings →

More from the funding graph