Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Beth Vogelzang Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$118k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$211kReligion$192kPhilanthropy$75kYouth Development$15kInternational$6kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The New Horizons$50,000
Women Doing Well$50,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
We Want More$6,000
Girls Inc$5,000
Empower International$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%The New Horizons: $50k → 14%Girls Inc: $10k → 17%Secure Coaching: $6k → 13%We Want More: $6k → 9%Bibles: $32k → 7%New Horizons Foundations: $50k → 9%Ancient Paths: $1k → 17%Eglesia Ciutat Nova: $15k → 7%Women Doing Well: $50k → 22%The New Horizons: $20k → 14%Girls Inc: $5k → 17%Women Doing Well: $40k → 22%Women Doing Well: $30k → 22%Women Doing Well: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
KS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Mary Beth Vogelzang Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mary Beth Vogelzang Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$300k · 4 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$300k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+14%

Still filing today

75%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WD
    WOMEN DOING WELL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $145k · revenue +90%
  • E
    Edify
    2× · 2022–2024 · $70k · revenue +32%
  • GI
    GIRLS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • EE
    Edify Early Childhood Development
    one grant, 2021 · $66k
  • B
    Bibles
    one grant, 2021 · $32k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
3
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
Spiritual Directors International

Spiritual Directors International inspires and connects seekers with spiritual guidance around the world and across traditions. Spiritual Directors International provides multi-faith and global education

Philanthropy
6
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
7
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
8
One Way Ministries

To activate god's people worldwide to exalt jesus christ & advance his gospel to the multitudes through prayer, proclamations, praise & partnership.

Religion
9
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
10
Women Forward International

Women forward international (wfi) partners the next generation with nonprofit and private sector organizations and artists to implement solutions critical to human process, bridging mind and heart to bring about unity, collaboration, and…

International
11
Media Impact International

To identify, assess, and come alongside partner ministries to strategically increase their media impact.

Education
12
Desiring God Ministries

As a christian hedonism publishing platform, persuaded by the indispensable biblical reality that god is most glorified in us when we are most satisfied in him, we exist - to move people to live for the glory of god, - by helping them be…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edify; the most unlike its peers is Ancient Path. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The New Horizons: $70,000 · OtherThe New HorizonsEdify Early Childhood Development: $66,000 · OtherEdify Early Childhood DevelopmentBibles: $32,097 · OtherBiblesIndividual grant recipient: $15,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientExpansion Church: $14,000 · OtherExpansion Church+2 more: $11,000 · OtherWOMEN DOING WELL INC: $145,000 · EducationWOMEN DOING WELL INCEdify: $70,170 · InternationalEdifyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $50,000 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizo…IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT INVESTI…WE WANT MORE INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyWE WANT MORE I…GIRLS INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentANCIENT PATH: $1,000 · ReligionPOWERS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $500 · Religion
Other$208,497Education$145,000International$70,170Philanthropy$66,000Youth Development$15,000Religion$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMEN DOING WELL INC: $145,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetEdify: $70,170 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANCIENT PATH: $1,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOMEN DOING WELL INC ↗
  • Who funds Edify ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WE WANT MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANCIENT PATH ↗
  • Who funds POWERS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Beth Vogelzang Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Beth Vogelzang Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mary Beth Vogelzang Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mary Beth Vogelzang Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Beth Vogelzang’s filings →

    More from the funding graph