Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$278kHuman Services$64kHealth$47kInternational$20kYouth Development$17kEducation$8kAnimals$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$4k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$937k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
The House FM$5,000
Eastern Heights Christian Church$5,000
Sunset Bible Camp$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
John 316 Missions$2,000
North Burma Christian MInistries$2,000
Innovations Family Wellness$2,000
Living Hope Pregnancy Center$2,000
Arms Around Broken Arrow$2,000
New Emergency Resource Agency$2,000
Heartland International Ministries$1,000
Life Gate Freedom Recovery$1,000
Opportunity Center- Ponca City$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MARLAND CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 14%MARLAND CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 14%Opportunity Center Inc: $1k → 16%OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$431k · 22 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
4

Total granted

$431k
$10k

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    Living Hope Pregnancy Center of Ponca City Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +26%
  • BA
    BUILDING ALL CHILDREN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $16k · revenue +400%
  • IF
    INNOVATIONS FAMILY WELLNESS
    3× · 2021–2024 · $14k · revenue +391%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUMMIT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • WC
    WOODLANDS CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • SA
    Salvation Army of Ponca City
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
2
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
3
Western Oklahoma Family Care Center

The western oklahoma family care center show's god's love by helping families in western oklahoma overcome barrier in their lives in order to help them become contributinng self-supporting citizens

Philanthropy
4
One Church One Child Inc

To inform the public the need for bridge family homes and identify families interested in adopting or fostering children of all races with special emphasis on African American children in state custody.

Housing & Shelter
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
6
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
7
Ozarks New Hope Inc

Provide integrated, patient-centered health services designed to meet the needs of all patients, regardless of ability to pay; help the healthcare industry better serve patients & community by promoting public health; supporting…

Health
8
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
9
The Urban Mission Inc

The organization provides emergency social and educational services to families in central oklahoma.

—
10
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
11
Central Oklahoma United Methodist Retirement Facility Inc

To develop and provide premier, wellness-based campuses and community outreach.

Human Services
12
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of North Central Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is Building All Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $138,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEASTERN HEIGHTS CHRISTIAN CHURCH INC: $62,000 · OtherEASTERN HEIGHTS CHRISTIAN CHURCH INCThe House FM: $27,500 · OtherThe House FMLiving Hope Pregnancy Center of Ponca City Inc: $27,000 · OtherLiving Hope Pregnancy Center of Ponca City IncPEOPLE CARING FOR PEOPLE: $24,500 · OtherPEOPLE CARING FOR PEOPLESUNSET BIBLE CAMP: $20,000 · OtherLAKEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCHBRIGHT CITY: $18,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF PONCA: $15,000 · Other+12 more: $47,500 · Other+12 moreHeartland International Ministries: $17,000 · Human ServicesJOHN 316 MISSION: $4,000 · Human ServicesMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesBUILDING ALL CHILDREN INC: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentINNOVATIONS FAMILY WELLNESS: $14,000 · HealthNORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,000 · AnimalsWORLD VISION INC: $2,620 · International
Other$379,500Human Services$25,000Youth Development$16,000Health$14,000Animals$7,000International$2,620

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLiving Hope Pregnancy Center of Ponca City Inc: $27,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetHeartland International Ministries: $17,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBUILDING ALL CHILDREN INC: $16,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetINNOVATIONS FAMILY WELLNESS: $14,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetNORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJOHN 316 MISSION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $2,620 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Living Hope Pregnancy Center of Ponca City Inc ↗
  • Who funds Heartland International Ministries ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING ALL CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds INNOVATIONS FAMILY WELLNESS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds NEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN 316 MISSION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madalynne L Peel FoundationOK15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madalynne L Peel Foundation · Glenn W Peel Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph