How much does Martinson Clinic Foundation give?

Martinson Clinic Foundation reported 7 grants totaling $45,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 7 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.

What does Martinson Clinic Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (52%), Health (38%), Human Services (10%).

Who are Martinson Clinic Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Tropical Health Alliance Foundation ($60k), Blood Cancer United Inc ($30k), Hammer Residences Inc ($28k).

Does Martinson Clinic Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Martinson Clinic Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Martinson Clinic Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.

Where is Martinson Clinic Foundation based?

Martinson Clinic Foundation is based in MN.

Martinson Clinic Foundation

Martinson Clinic Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Martinson Clinic Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$10k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$140kHealth$102kHuman Services$28k

02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k6 grants · $35k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$575k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
TROPICAL HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION	$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MN FOUNDATION	$8,000
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY	$7,000
HAMMER RESIDENCES	$5,000
ST DAVID'S CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND FAMILY SERVICES	$5,000
INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS	$5,000
BLOOD CANCER UNITED	$5,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$215k · 6 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$215k

$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%

+31%

Still filing today

67%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TH
Tropical Health Alliance Foundation
6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +112%
HR
Hammer Residences Inc
6× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +47%
IO
INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
6× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +29%

Funded once

CA
COLORADO ASSOCIATION FOR BEHAVIOR ANALYSISgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +31%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

7/7

Grantees still filing

5/7

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Education$110,000Other$97,000Health$30,000Human Services$28,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martinson Clinic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martinson Clinic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Martinson Clinic Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Martinson Clinic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Martinson Clinic’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home