Skip to content

· Private foundation

Martin & Arlyn Shields Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$380kInternational$215kHuman Services$100kHealth$89kAnimals$51kReligion$28kCivil Rights$5kCrime & Legal$3k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Love Must Act$30,000
Door County Med Center Foundation$15,000
My Life Speaks$10,000
Baylor University$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LEAP Global Missions$5,000
God's Garage$5,000
Brownsville Society for Crippled Ch$5,000
Salvation Army$5,000
Operation Pets Alive$5,000
Tennessee Baptist Children's Home$1,000
Houston SPCA$1,000
YELOline Initiative$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%God's Garage: $5k → 9%God's Garage: $5k → 9%God's Garage: $4k → 9%God's Garage: $4k → 9%God's Garage: $2k → 9%God's Garage: $2k → 9%God's Garage: $2k → 9%God's Garage: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Martin & Arlyn Shields Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Martin & Arlyn Shields Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$862k · 16 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$862k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+98%

Still filing today

56%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalEducationHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $160k · revenue +24%
  • BS
    BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +210%
  • GG
    Gods Garage Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • FL
    FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +98%
  • CC
    CHRIST CHAPEL BIBLE CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • SH
    SAFE HAVEN CAT SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
2
Bailing Out Bentley

We rescue dogs and cats that require major medical treatment, we then provide them with veterinary care. rehabilitate them and then adopt the animals out into loving forever homes.

Animals
3
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
4
Dog People of Livingston

The Fix Clinics mission is to promote the welfare of pets and their guardians by providing accessible, affordable, and timely spay and neuter services in Livingston Parish. In addition, we are committed to supporting partner organizations…

Animals
5
League City Pets Alive

Prevention of animal cruelty and death

Animals
6
Allies Haven Animal Rescue

Saving unwanted, abandoned, abused and neglected dogs in Texas. Also to promote proper pet ownership, community educational programs and to support spaying/neutering as a means to control unwanted pets. We provide complete vetting prior to…

Animals
7
Friends for Life Animal Rescue

Our mission is to resuce dogs and cats from the street. to spay or neuter, innoculate and care for them until homes are found. in addition, the second part of our mission is to educate the public ont he importance of spaying and neutering…

Animals
8
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
9
Red Collar Rescue Inc

RED COLLAR RESCUE is an all-volunteer 501 (c) (3) animal welfare charity dedicated to rescuing and providing extensive medical care, foster care, training, rehabilitation, and adoptive placement to stray, abandoned, and abused dogs in…

Animals
10
Love and Puppy Paws Dog Rescue

Love And Puppy Paws Dog Rescue (LAPP Dog Rescue) was formed to help alleviate the stress of city and county animal control facilities around South and Central Texas. We accept dogs into our rescue that are in overpopulated animal control…

Animals
11
Help Orphaned Pets Everywhere

Rescue domestic home pets such as dogs and cats from being destroyed and to place them in homes where they will be properly cared for.

Animals
12
Bastrop Animal Rescue

Rescuing abandoned, abused, or neglected pets from bastrop county and surrounding counties; bar assists with the care, treatement, and foster care for animals located in the local community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is MyLIFEspeaks; the most unlike its peers is Gods Garage Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Love Must Act: $220,000 · OtherLove Must ActOrder of the Holy Cross S Africa Fu: $60,000 · OtherOrder of the Holy Cross S Africa FuSalvation Army: $57,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyDoor County Med Center Foundation: $55,500 · OtherDoor County Med Center FoundationTENNESSEE BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOMES INC: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,500 · Other+4 more: $13,600 · OtherBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $160,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITYmyLIFEspeaks: $140,000 · InternationalmyLIFEspeaksLEAP GLOBAL MISSIONS: $15,000 · InternationalLEAP GLOBAL MISSIONSOPERATION PETS ALIVE: $24,000 · AnimalsHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $14,500 · AnimalsCitizens For Animal Protection Inc: $11,000 · AnimalsBROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $33,000 · HealthGods Garage Inc: $27,000 · Human ServicesFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Civil RightsYELOLINE INITIATIVE INC: $3,000 · Religion
Other$437,600Education$160,000International$155,000Animals$49,500Health$33,000Human Services$27,000Civil Rights$5,000Religion$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $160,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetmyLIFEspeaks: $140,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetBROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $33,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetGods Garage Inc: $27,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetOPERATION PETS ALIVE: $24,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetLEAP GLOBAL MISSIONS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $14,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens For Animal Protection Inc: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYELOLINE INITIATIVE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds myLIFEspeaks ↗
  • Who funds BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Gods Garage Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION PETS ALIVE ↗
  • Who funds LEAP GLOBAL MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Citizens For Animal Protection Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds YELOLINE INITIATIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martin & Arlyn Shields Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martin & Arlyn Shields Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Martin & Arlyn Shields Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph