Skip to content
Martha Morse Beck Von Peccoz Animal Plc at a glance

· Private foundation

Martha Morse Beck Von Peccoz Animal Plc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$395k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
23
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Animals$1.1MFood & Nutrition$37kArts & Culture$23kHuman Services$20kHealth$5kYouth Development$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $200k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $195k
$6,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAMASTE EQUINE RESCUE LTD$38,000
WILDWOODS$25,000
ASAP-AMERICAN STANDARDBRED ADOPT PROGRAM$25,000
SKIP PROGRAM$25,000
TINY HOOVES RESCUE$25,000
JOURNEY HOME EQUINE$25,000
RUTH STEINERT MEMORIAL SPCA$20,000
DOGS DESERVE BETTER PIEDMONT$12,000
THE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER$8,000
JOURNEY HOME ANIMAL RESCUE$6,000
539 MAD-DOG CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED$6,000
WILD CARE INC$6,000
RED FEATHER FARM$6,000
NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER$6,000
PATTYS PARROT PALACE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIGHT EYES CARE AND REHAB CENTER INC: $6k → 13%WILD INSTINCTS: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
NV
WY
SD
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
AZ
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$493k · 16 repeat orgs$712k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
65

Total granted

$493k
$484k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

63%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $228k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W
    WILDWOODS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $45k · revenue +212%
  • HE
    HAPPILY EVER AFTER ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $35k · revenue +17%
  • SAFE HAVEN FOR CATS
    2× · 2022–2024 · $35k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • HF
    HEARTLAND FARM SANCTUARY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MILWAUKEE AREA DOMESTIC ANIMAL CONTROL COMMISSION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • ET
    E TOWN
    one grant, 2024 · $23k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
2
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
3
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
4
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
5
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
6
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
7
Raskels Rescue
Animals
8
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
9
Angel Wing Acres Animal Welfare Soc Lombas
Animals
10
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
11
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
12
Grace Farm Animal Rescue and Sanctu
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kingdom Animal Shelterinc; the most unlike its peers is Beaverhead Animal Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/88
Grantees still filing
41/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAMASTE EQUINE RESCUE LTD: $149,000 · AnimalsNAMASTE EQUINE RESCUE LTDWILDWOODS: $45,000 · AnimalsWILDWOODSHAPPILY EVER AFTER ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $35,000 · AnimalsSAFE HAVEN FOR CATS: $35,000 · Animals+72 more: $559,500 · Animals+72 moreJOURNEY HOME EQUINE: $50,000 · OtherJOURNEY HOME EQUINEASAP-AMERICAN STANDARDBRED ADOPT PROGRAM: $37,000 · OtherASAP-AMERICAN STANDARDBRED …E TOWN: $22,500 · OtherE TOWNREZ-SOLUTIONS AND ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $20,000 · OtherREZ-SOLUTIONS AND ANIMAL SH…RAPTOR INC: $16,000 · OtherRAPTOR INCSLEEPING BEAR WILDLIFE FUND: $16,000 · OtherSLEEPING BEAR WILDLIFE FUNDFOSTER PARROTS LTD: $13,500 · OtherFREE AGAIN INC: $12,000 · OtherMISFIT TOYS RESCUE DIVISION INC: $12,000 · Other539 MAD-DOG CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED: $11,000 · OtherTROUT UNLIMITED GREATER BOSTON CHAPTER: $11,000 · Other+13 more: $70,500 · Other+13 moreThe MISS Foundation Mothers in Sympathy & Support: $20,000 · Human ServicesWILD INSTINCTS INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesMAC'S MISSION: $6,000 · Human ServicesBRIGHT EYES ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesSKIP PROGRAM: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER: $8,000 · HealthWHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATIONINC: $6,000 · EnvironmentTHE CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $2,500 · Public Benefit
Animals$823,500Other$291,500Human Services$43,000Youth Development$25,000Health$8,000Environment$6,000Education$5,000Public Benefit$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAMASTE EQUINE RESCUE LTD: $149,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetWILDWOODS: $45,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetHAPPILY EVER AFTER ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $35,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetSAFE HAVEN FOR CATS: $35,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BOSTON: $27,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSKIP PROGRAM: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHEARTLAND FARM SANCTUARY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTINY HOOVES RESCUE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF MILWAUKEE AREA DOMESTIC ANIMAL CONTROL COMMISSION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetE TOWN: $22,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBATTLE MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetThe MISS Foundation Mothers in Sympathy & Support: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSCRATCHING POST INC: $16,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetRAPTOR INC: $16,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFELLOW MORTALS INC: $12,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FRONT INC: $12,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetDogs Deserve Better Piedmont: $12,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetNEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILD INSTINCTS INC: $11,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE WILDCAT SANCTUARY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER: $8,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHAPPY TALES ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE FOR HORSES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAnimal Haven of Asheville: $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSt Francis Animal Sanctuary Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCAROLINA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENT ER: $8,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE & K9 CHARITIES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFLEET OF ANGELS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSTREET PAWS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCarolina Animal Rescue & Adoption Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPONY TALES REFUGE AND REHAB INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetALL HEARTS RESCUE: $6,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetBubbles Dog Rescue: $6,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCHICAGOLAND EXOTIC ANIMAL RESCUE: $6,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSARVEY WILDLIFE CARE CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRED FEATHER FARM: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKINGDOM ANIMAL SHELTERINC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBAYPATH HUMANE SOCIETY OF HOPKINTON INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRIGHT EYES ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetS O S ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSandy Paws Rescue Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWEST PLACE ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATIONINC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCARRIE A SEAMAN ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetKAY'S ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLYNCHBURG HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA PANHANDLE MARINE INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Good CharitiesThe Duffield Family F…Best Friends Animal S…Humane World for Anim…American Tower Corpor…Pedigree FoundationPaypal Charitable Giv…Ge Aerospace Foundati…AbbVie FoundationPetsmart Charities IncAmica Companies Found…BISSELL Pet Foundation
Greater Good CharitiesWA31.5× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Good Charities · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Best Friends Animal Society · Humane World for Animals Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Pedigree Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Amica Companies Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martha Morse Beck Von Peccoz Animal Plc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martha Morse Beck Von Peccoz Animal Plc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Whale and Dolphin Conservationinc: 3% of income from government
  • New England Wildlife Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Animal Rescue League of Boston: 0% of income from government
  • Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Martha Morse Beck Von Peccoz Animal Plc?

Find your warmest path to Martha Morse Beck Von Peccoz Animal Plc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Martha Morse Beck Von Peccoz Animal Plc’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home