Skip to content

· Private foundation

Martha Mertz Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$448k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.7MHousing & Shelter$484kYouth Development$80kCrime & Legal$30k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $225k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $223k
$42,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES$105,000
PROVIDENCE HOUSE$66,000
WOMEN IN NEED INC$52,000
HOMEWARD NYC$43,000
GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT$42,000
FORESTDALE INC$41,000
RESTORE INC$34,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NYC$19,000
WOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION$16,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FORESTDALE INC: $41k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP INC: $14k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $72k → 20%FORESTDALE INC: $37k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP INC: $12k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $67k → 20%FORESTDALE INC: $35k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP INC: $5k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $66k → 20%FORESTDALE INC: $35k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP INC: $5k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $64k → 20%FORESTDALE INC: $34k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP INC: $4k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $61k → 20%FORESTDALE: $29k → 13%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $60k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $135k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $115k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $105k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $105k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $100k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $97k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $52k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $50k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $44k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $42k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $40k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $44k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $42k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $40k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $29k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $20k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$2.3M
$0

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $657k · revenue +5%
  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $390k · revenue +90%
  • WOMEN IN NEED INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $253k · revenue +66%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Under 21

    Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

    Human Services
    2
    United Bronx Parents Inc

    To provide the basic human services necessary for families and individuals to obtain self-proficiency, through dignity in their struggle to participate as the functioning and valuable citizens they inherently are.

    Human Services
    3
    Pibly Residential Programs Inc

    Pibly's mission embraces the belief that the needs of its consumers can be met and their goals can be achieved. pibly strives to expand opportunities for people living with mental health challenges by delivering person centered services…

    —
    4
    The Young Women's Christian Association of Yonkers

    Ywca is dedicated to empowering women and promoting peace, health, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

    —
    5
    Breaking Ground Housing Development Fund Corporation

    We offer affordable housing and support programs for homeless and vulnerable new yorkers.

    Housing & Shelter
    6
    Young Women's Christian Association of Rochester and Monroe County

    The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

    Human Services
    7
    Graham Windham

    To make a life-altering difference with children, youth and families who are overcoming some of life's most difficult challenges and obstacles, by helping to build a strong foundation for life: a safe, loving, permanent family and the…

    Human Services
    8
    163RD Street Improvement Council Inc

    163rd street improvement council runs 5 housing programs that addresses housing and homelessness. headquarters has begun a community garden, and a community health fair engaging all the programs and partners.

    Housing & Shelter
    9
    Catholic Charities Neighborhood Services Inc

    Catholic charities neighborhood services, inc. (ccns) is a not-for-profit corporation that provides a variety of social services throughout the boroughs of brooklyn and queens. ccns currently offers 160-plus programs and services for…

    Human Services
    10
    Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

    Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

    —
    11
    Diaspora Community Services Inc

    diaspora community services is a social support service agency that empowers low income families and individuals to maximize their abilities to overcome obstacles to their well-being and self-sufficiency.

    —
    12
    Covenant House

    In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Shepherd Services; the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Help Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    10/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $657,150 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICESPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $389,900 · Human ServicesPROVIDENCE HOUSE INCWOMEN IN NEED INC: $252,650 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED INCFORESTDALE INC: $211,000 · Human ServicesFORESTDALE INCGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC: $195,000 · Human ServicesGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC+1 more: $40,350 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $83,925 · OtherIndividual grant…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $80,400 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG…RESTORE INC: $73,000 · OtherRESTORE INCCATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES: $60,700 · OtherCATHOLIC GUARDIA…WOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME: $30,200 · OtherWOMEN'S PRISON A…WEST END RESIDENCES HDFC INC DBA HOMEWARD NYC: $231,400 · Housing & ShelterWEST END RE…
    Human Services$1,746,050Other$328,225Housing & Shelter$231,400

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $657,150 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $389,900 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $252,650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWEST END RESIDENCES HDFC INC DBA HOMEWARD NYC: $231,400 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFORESTDALE INC: $211,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC: $195,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $80,400 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES: $60,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP INC: $40,350 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetWOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME: $30,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
    • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
    • Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
    • Who funds WEST END RESIDENCES HDFC INC DBA HOMEWARD NYC ↗
    • Who funds FORESTDALE INC ↗
    • Who funds GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC ↗
    • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
    • Who funds CATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES ↗
    • Who funds PREGNANCY HELP INC ↗
    • Who funds WOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Robin Hood FoundationNY15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Dammann Fund Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · American Express Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Martha Mertz Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martha Mertz Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Martha Mertz Foundation Inc?

      Find your warmest path to Martha Mertz Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Martha Mertz’s filings →

      More from the funding graph