Skip to content
Martha Jefferson Hospital at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Martha Jefferson Hospital

As part of sentara health's integrated delivery system, we improve health every day.

$6.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$33MEmployment$300kFood & Nutrition$96kEducation$23kRecreation & Sports$10kHuman Services$10kEnvironment$7k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+2 grants · $6.4M
$1,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$248M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SENTARA HEALTH$5,389,271
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FOUNATION$1,000,000
BIRTH SISTERS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE$25,000
ALBEMARLE FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMON GROUND HEALING ARTS: $20k → 8%COMMON GROUND HEALING ARTS: $10k → 8%COMMON GROUND HEALING ARTS: $6k → 8%COMMON GROUND HEALING ARTS: $6k → 8%COMMON GROUND HEALING ARTS: $6k → 8%PIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27M · 14 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$27M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+39%

Still filing today

71%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SENTARA HOSPITALS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20M · revenue +75%
  • SH
    SENTARA HEALTH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6.3M · revenue +493%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $325k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $4.0M · revenue +77% · 42% of their budget
  • PV
    PIEDMONT VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -30%
  • VO
    VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Virginia Health Services Inc

Central virginia health services, inc. (organization) is a non-profit health care organization with locations in bowling green, charles city, new canton, charlotte court house, farmville, alberta, petersburg, aylett, hopewell, montross,…

Health
2
Virginia Coalition for Progressive Values

To establish an effective, long-term and resilient political infrastructure that advocates for and delivers public policy victories which reflect the values held in common by our members.

—
3
Southwest Virginia Community Health Systems Inc

Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communities served.

Health
4
Northern Virginia Health Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Virginia Press Foundation Virginia Local News Project
Civil Rights
6
Uva Community Health Inc

Our mission: transforming health and inspiring hope for all virginians and beyond. our vision: to be the nation's leading public academic health system and a best place to work - while transforming patient care, research, education, and…

Health
7
The Commonwealth Institute for

To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.

Public Benefit
8
West Virginia Community Voices Inc

To improve the health and health care quality for the residents of west virginia.

—
9
Charlottesville Biohub

The mission of cvillebiohub accelerates the biotechnology industry through engagement,resourcing and education.

Community Improvement
10
Williamsburg Community Health Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
12
New Virginia Majority

New Virginia Majority is a grassroots organization that works with low income people in local communities through leadership development, trainings and workshops, issue education and advocacy.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charlottesville Free Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Free Range Psychiatry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SENTARA HOSPITALS: $20,159,480 · HealthSENTARA HOSPITALSSENTARA HEALTH: $6,269,143 · HealthSENTARA HEALTH+8 more: $612,030 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VIR…UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VIR…+3 more: $117,000 · EducationCHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $373,750 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE: $61,500 · PhilanthropyPIEDMONT VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $200,000 · OtherLOCAL FOOD HUB INC: $66,649 · OtherTRINTY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $34,820 · OtherALBEMARLE-CHARLOTTESVILLE NAACP: $20,000 · OtherJEFFERSON SCHOOL AFRICAN AMERICAN HERITAGE CENTER INC: $17,500 · Other+2 more: $17,200 · OtherCOMMON GROUND HEALING ARTS: $47,680 · Human ServicesPIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCultivate Charlottesville: $29,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE UHURU FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $19,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY CLIMATE COLLABORATIVE: $6,800 · Environment
Health$27,040,653Education$5,117,000Philanthropy$435,250Other$356,169Human Services$57,680Youth Development$39,500Community Improvement$19,500Environment$6,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENTARA HOSPITALS: $20,159,480 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSENTARA HEALTH: $6,269,143 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4,000,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $373,750 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE: $325,000 over 5y, 9.5% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC: $145,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetPIEDMONT VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOCAL FOOD HUB INC: $66,649 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE: $61,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND HEALING ARTS: $47,680 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetBirth Sisters of Charlottesville: $32,280 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCultivate Charlottesville: $29,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetREGION TEN COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $19,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UHURU FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE ALBEMARLE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREE RANGE PSYCHIATRY INC: $9,750 over 1y, 10% of budgetALBEMARLE COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY INC: $7,200 over 1y, 57% of budgetAlbemarle Foundation For Education: $7,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLIMATE COLLABORATIVE: $6,800 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREENE CARE CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetOrange Free Clinic Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sentara HealthCharlottesville Area …The Genan FoundationManning Family Founda…Perry Foundation IncThe Hartfield Fdn Inc…The Charles Fund IncOakwood Foundation Ch…United Way of Greater…Caplin FoundationThe Hut FoundationThe J & E Berkley Fou…
Sentara HealthVA39.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sentara Health · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The Genan Foundation · Manning Family Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · The Hartfield Fdn Inc 0739-80-42 · The Charles Fund Inc · Oakwood Foundation Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater Charlottesville · Caplin Foundation · The Hut Foundation · The J & E Berkley Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martha Jefferson Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martha Jefferson Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Martha Jefferson Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home