Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hut Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2020
39
Grants FY2020
6
States reached
$183k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Philanthropy$474kHealth$220kFood & Nutrition$160kYouth Development$115kHousing & Shelter$107kEducation$105kCrime & Legal$76kEnvironment$50kOther$0
02FY2020 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $592k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $639k
$16,250
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$182,500
SCHWAB CHARITABLE$146,250
THE VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM$145,000
VANGUARD CHARITABLE$100,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA$65,000
THE HAVEN AT FIRST AND MARKET$42,500
THE FOUNTAIN FUND$40,000
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY$35,000
THE MILLER SCHOOL OF ALBEMARLE$35,000
LITTLE KESWICK EDUCATION CORP$35,000
RED WIGGLER COMMUNITY FARM$30,000
CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC$25,000
CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
WINTERGREEN ADAPTIVE SPORTS$25,000
LIFELINE OUTREACH MINISTRIES OBX$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Pegasus Project: $4k → 10%RED WIGGLER COMMUNITY FARM: $30k → 8%PEGASUS PROJECT: $5k → 10%THE HAVEN AT FIRST AND MARKET: $43k → 8%Red Wiggler Community Farm: $10k → 8%RED WIGGLER COMMUNITY FARM: $10k → 8%RED WIGGLER COMMUNITY FARM: $10k → 8%PIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC: $20k → 8%READYKIDS INC: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
PA
RI
CA
VA
MD
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 23% of The Hut Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Hut Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$293k · 8 repeat orgs$717k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$293k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+87%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $662k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $60k · revenue +82%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $43k · revenue +101%
  • IN
    International Neighbors Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $17k · revenue +200%

Funded once

  • BG
    Boys Girls Club of Charlottesville
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AF
    ACTION FOR ALL CORP
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • TF
    THE FOUNTAIN FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Groundwork Rva Inc

Mission: to cultivate the next generation of urban conservationists in richmond, virginia. vision: groundwork rva works with richmond youth to increase environmental, economic, and social well-being in neighborhoods by transforming…

Community Improvement
2
Healthy Chesapeake Inc

Healthy chesapeake is committed to building a culture of wellness that supports, sustains and advocates for a healthier chesapeake. to achieve this, healthy chesapeake recognizes that health and well-being are interconnected with social,…

Health
3
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
4
Community Alternatives Inc

To provide responsive, person-centered services to improve the quality of life of individuals with disabilities.

Employment
5
Bethesda Green Inc

Bethesda green works to locally accelerate the sustainable economy with a focus on innovation, impact, and community. we are an incubator, a connector, and a community partner. we accelerate green business startups into viable companies…

Environment
6
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
7
Startup Virginia Inc

Startup virginia is a non-profit, high-growth-business incubator, dedicated to building a long-term, sustainable economy for virginia. we connect our startup community to exceptional mentors and extensive programs in a dynamic workspace.

Community Improvement
8
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
9
Housing Virginia Campaign Inc

Housingforward virginia helps community leaders take action to solve their housing challenges. as a trusted partner and innovator, we use evidence- based solutions to build a future where everyone has a safe, stable home they can afford.

Housing & Shelter
10
Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden Inc

Mission - we connect people to plants by inspiring communities to explore and conserve nature.our commitments - organizational sustainability, environmental resiliency, collaboration and gathering, social responsibilityour vision - we are…

Environment
11
Nw Works Inc

Our mission is to empower adults with disabilities and individuals with barriers to employment to build skills and secure and sustain meaningful employment.

Employment
12
Virginia Housing Alliance

Tracing its roots to the 1980s, the virginia housing alliance (vha) is the statewide leader in expanding housing opportunities, strengthening the capacity of affordable housing and homelessness service organizations, and advancing…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Readykids Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pegasus Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior & Disability Residen…Homeless Services & Housing…Behavioral Health & Trauma …Elementary Charter SchoolsYouth Arts EducationSocial Justice Advocacy Org…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%29%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr12%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr16%54%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr12%7%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/35
the rest of the field
13%
3,610/28,337

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
21/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $182,500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTVIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM INC — $148,721 · PhilanthropyVIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM INCDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $146,250 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $100,000 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAMCHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $36,600 · Philanthropy+2 moreGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY — $35,000 · OtherGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITYLIFELINE OUTREACH MINISTRIES OBX — $25,000 · OtherLIFELINE OUTREACH MINISTRIES…GREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $25,000 · OtherGREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE HABI…LITTLE KESWICK SCHOOL — $20,000 · OtherLITTLE KESWICK SCHOOLPEOPLE CYCLE INC DBA RICHMOND CYCLING CORP — $15,000 · OtherCHI ALPHA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP AT UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $15,000 · OtherANYTHING IS EVERYTHING — $15,000 · OtherLOCAL FOOD HUB INC — $15,000 · OtherCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC — $25,000 · OtherCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE…THE HAVEN INC — $39,400 · OtherTHE HAVEN INCWINTERGREEN ADAPTIVE SPORTS — $25,000 · OtherWINTERGREEN ADAPTIVE SPORTS+14 more — $114,925 · Other+14 moreRED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesRED WIGGLER…THE HAVEN AT FIRST AND MARKET INC — $42,500 · Human ServicesTHE HAVEN A…PIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesPIEDMONT FA…READYKIDS INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesREADYKIDS I…PEGASUS PROJECT — $9,000 · Human ServicesPEGASUS PRO…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…Cultivate Charlottesville — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentCultivate…THE MILLER SCHOOL OF ALBEMARLE — $35,000 · EducationLITTLE KESWICK EDUCATION CORPORATION — $35,000 · EducationTHE FOUNTAIN FUND — $50,075 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER — $16,250 · Crime & LegalTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE — $42,500 · HealthZEPONIC FARMS INC — $10,000 · Health
Philanthropy$639,071Other$369,325Human Services$146,500Youth Development$120,000Education$70,000Crime & Legal$66,325Health$52,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $182,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM INC — $148,721 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $146,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA — $90,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetRED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetTHE FOUNTAIN FUND — $50,075 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE — $42,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE HAVEN AT FIRST AND MARKET INC — $42,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HAVEN INC — $39,400 over 4y, 85% of budgetTHE MILLER SCHOOL OF ALBEMARLE — $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE KESWICK EDUCATION CORPORATION — $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCultivate Charlottesville — $30,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetInternational Neighbors Inc — $16,600 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER — $16,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREADYKIDS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOCAL FOOD HUB INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCreative Works Farm Inc — $11,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetWINTERGREEN VOLUNTEER FIRE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetACADEMY ART MUSEUM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPhillips Wharf Environmental Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetRIVANNA CONSERVATION ALLIANCE — $8,925 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOccidental Arts and Ecology Center — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelfast Historical Society and Museum — $4,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA39.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The Genan Foundation · Caplin Foundation · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · Sentara Health · The Charles Fund Inc · Oakwood Foundation Charitable Trust · The Rimora Foundation · Manning Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Charlottesville · The J & E Berkley Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hut Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Phillips Wharf Environmental Center Inc21% of income from government
  • Academy Art Museum Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hut Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hut Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph