Skip to content

· Private foundation

Martha Ann Cogdell Hospital Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$800k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$3.1MHealth$1.5MRecreation & Sports$210kHuman Services$180kFood & Nutrition$150kCommunity Improvement$140kYouth Development$115kEducation$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k20 grants · $630k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cogdell Clinic Briscoe County$60,000
Texas Tech Foundation Inc$60,000
City of Lockney Ambulance Fund$50,000
Silverton Voluntary Fire Department$40,000
City of Quitaque Voluntary Fire Dep$40,000
WJ Mangold Memorial Hospital Founda$40,000
One Voice Home$40,000
Silverton Voluntary Ambulance Servi$40,000
City of Turkey Volunteer Fire Depar$40,000
Matador Motley County Volunteer Fir$40,000
Colton's Encouragement$30,000
Rock Salt Youth Group$30,000
Tri County Meals$30,000
City of Claude Fire Department$30,000
Motley County Ambulance Service$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%SEVEN STAR HORSE & FAMILY CENTER: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 32 repeat orgs$360k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
8

Total granted

$5.0M
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+77%

Still filing today

16%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Cogdell Clinic Briscoe County
    8× · 2017–2025 · $390k
  • UF
    UMC FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $350k · revenue +71%
  • SV
    Silverton Voluntary Ambulance Servi
    9× · 2017–2025 · $310k

Funded once

  • WM
    WJ MANGOLD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & CLIN
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • CH
    COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue -13%
  • RH
    Ranching Heritage Associationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +135%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.

Health
2
Tejas Health Care

To provide primary health and dental care to the underserved of fayette and lee counties, texas.

Health
3
Texas Health Care Association

To unite, represent, and support professionals who strive to improve the delivery, quality, and integrity of long term healthcare services.

—
4
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
5
Health Services of North Texas Inc

Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…

Health
6
Turn Center Foundation Inc

The turn center foundation manages and stewards charitable contributions to ensure the long-term sustainability of turn center's mission to provide occupational, physical, and speech therapy services to children.

—
7
Medical Center League House of Amarillo Texas Inc

To serve as a home away from home for patients and their families coming to amarillo, texas for health care treatment.

Health
8
Southeast Texas Hospice Foundation

Provide support for southeast texas hospice inc, a non-profit organization providing hospice services for the southeast texas area

—
9
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas

Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.

Health
10
Health Center of Southeast Texas

Our mission is to provide accessible, compassionate, culturally competent, and quality health care, affordable for all, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
11
Meals On Wheels South Texas

Provide nutrition, transportation, and other services that support independent living for seniors, including the operation of a senior citizens center, meals on wheels, and transportation services within victoria and the surrounding…

Food & Nutrition
12
Sterling Area Health Center

Combining leadership and teamwork to provide caring, high quality, efficient, and affordable primary health care for all segments of the community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turn Center; the most unlike its peers is Tri-County Meals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cogdell Clinic Briscoe County: $390,000 · OtherCogdell Clinic Briscoe CountySilverton Voluntary Ambulance Servi: $310,000 · OtherSilverton Voluntary Ambulance ServiSILVERTON VOLUNTARY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $310,000 · OtherSILVERTON VOLUNTARY FIRE DEPARTMENTCity of Lockney Ambulance Fund: $270,000 · OtherCity of Lockney Ambulance FundCITY OF CLAUDE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $270,000 · OtherCITY OF CLAUDE FIRE DEPARTMENTCity of Turkey Volunteer Fire Depar: $250,000 · OtherCity of Turkey Volunteer Fire DeparMotley County Ambulance Service: $245,000 · OtherMotley County Ambulance ServiceWJ MANGOLD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDA: $245,000 · OtherWJ MANGOLD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDACLARENDON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $240,000 · OtherCLARENDON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTMatador Motley County Volunteer Fir: $220,000 · Other+23 more: $1,640,000 · Other+23 moreUMC FOUNDATION: $350,000 · HealthUMC FOUNDA…TURN CENTER: $100,000 · HealthTURN CENTE…COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $60,000 · HealthCOVENANT H…ONE VOICE HOME: $130,000 · Human ServicesSEVEN STAR HORSE AND FAMILY CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesSILVERTON DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION INC: $140,000 · Community ImprovementTRI-COUNTY MEALS: $140,000 · PhilanthropyTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · EducationHEDLEY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$4,390,000Health$510,000Human Services$150,000Community Improvement$140,000Philanthropy$140,000Education$60,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUMC FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetSILVERTON DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION INC: $140,000 over 5y, 34% of budgetTRI-COUNTY MEALS: $140,000 over 7y, 28% of budgetONE VOICE HOME: $130,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetTURN CENTER: $100,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRanching Heritage Association: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSEVEN STAR HORSE AND FAMILY CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UMC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SILVERTON DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY MEALS ↗
  • Who funds ONE VOICE HOME ↗
  • Who funds TURN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ranching Heritage Association ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN STAR HORSE AND FAMILY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary E Bivins FoundationTX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary E Bivins Foundation · James a Buddy Davidson Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of West Texas · Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martha Ann Cogdell Hospital Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martha Ann Cogdell Hospital Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Martha Ann Cogdell Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph