· Private foundation
Martha Ann Cogdell Hospital Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k20 grants · $630k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cogdell Clinic Briscoe County | $60,000 |
| Texas Tech Foundation Inc | $60,000 |
| City of Lockney Ambulance Fund | $50,000 |
| City of Quitaque Voluntary Fire Dep | $40,000 |
| Matador Motley County Volunteer Fir | $40,000 |
| Silverton Voluntary Fire Department | $40,000 |
| WJ Mangold Memorial Hospital Founda | $40,000 |
| One Voice Home | $40,000 |
| City of Turkey Volunteer Fire Depar | $40,000 |
| Silverton Voluntary Ambulance Servi | $40,000 |
| Motley County Ambulance Service | $30,000 |
| Seven Star Horse Family Center | $30,000 |
| City of Lockney Volunteer Fire Dept | $30,000 |
| Turn Center | $30,000 |
| Tri County Meals | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCogdell Clinic Briscoe County8× · 2017–2025 · $390k
- UFUMC FOUNDATION7× · 2018–2024 · $350k · revenue +71%
- SVSilverton Voluntary Ambulance Servi9× · 2017–2025 · $310k
Funded once
- WMWJ MANGOLD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & CLINone grant, 2019 · $100k
- CHCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue -13%
- RHRanching Heritage Associationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +135%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.
To provide primary health and dental care to the underserved of fayette and lee counties, texas.
To unite, represent, and support professionals who strive to improve the delivery, quality, and integrity of long term healthcare services.
Hospice care of terminally ill patients
Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…
The turn center foundation manages and stewards charitable contributions to ensure the long-term sustainability of turn center's mission to provide occupational, physical, and speech therapy services to children.
To serve as a home away from home for patients and their families coming to amarillo, texas for health care treatment.
Provide support for southeast texas hospice inc, a non-profit organization providing hospice services for the southeast texas area
Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.
Our mission is to provide accessible, compassionate, culturally competent, and quality health care, affordable for all, regardless of ability to pay.
Provide nutrition, transportation, and other services that support independent living for seniors, including the operation of a senior citizens center, meals on wheels, and transportation services within victoria and the surrounding…
Combining leadership and teamwork to provide caring, high quality, efficient, and affordable primary health care for all segments of the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turn Center and the most unlike its peers is Tri-County Meals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UMC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SILVERTON DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY MEALS ↗
- Who funds ONE VOICE HOME ↗
- Who funds TURN CENTER ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ranching Heritage Association ↗
- Who funds SEVEN STAR HORSE AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mary E Bivins Foundation · James a Buddy Davidson Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of West Texas · Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Martha Ann Cogdell Hospital Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.