Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Martens Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Religion$125kHealth$59kEducation$25kRecreation & Sports$9kFood & Nutrition$7kAnimals$5kYouth Development$4kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$1,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$320k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$18,700
JAE FOUNDATION$5,000
IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY$2,500
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,500
CAMP PERKINS LUTHERAN MINISTRIES$2,000
COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FNDN INC$1,400
XROSSWAY LUTHERAN MINISTRIES$1,000
PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FNDN$500
VISIONS CHARITIES INC$278
RARE K I C K S INC$250
TWIN FALLS AMERICAN LEGION$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CAMP PERKINS LOM INC: $5k → 7%YOUTH WITH A MISSION: $750 → 8%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 8%RARE K I C K S INC: $250 → 11%CLOVER TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $7k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO FOUNDATION: $200 → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $2k → 13%SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $2k → 16%OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL: $250 → 21%PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FNDN: $500 → 12%CAMP PERKINS LOM INC: $4k → 7%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%JAE FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 12%OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL: $200 → 21%CAMP PERKINS LUTHERAN MINISTRIES: $2k → 7%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%XROSSWAY LUTHERAN MINISTRIES: $25k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 12%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $20k → 11%IDAHO PUBLIC TELEVISION: $220 → 8%IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $19k → 11%IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 8%IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $16k → 11%IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 8%JAE FOUNDATION: $14k → 11%IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 8%IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $13k → 11%JAE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $12k → 11%JAE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%BOYS GIRLS CLUBS: $1k → 11%BOYS GIRLS CLUBS: $1k → 11%XROSSWAY LUTHERAN MINISTRIES: $1k → 11%BOYS GIRLS CLUBS: $800 → 11%XROSSWAY LUTHERAN MINISTRIES: $500 → 11%VISIONS CHARITIES INC: $278 → 11%HOSPICE VISIONS INC: $250 → 11%HOSPICE VISIONS INC: $218 → 11%HOSPICE VISIONS INC: $213 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$221k · 14 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$221k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+10%

Still filing today

43%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    Jae Foundation Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $57k · revenue +80%
  • IH
    Idaho Humane Society Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • BS
    Boise State University Foundation Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • CT
    CLOVER TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • TF
    TWIN FALLS COUNTY 4-H FFA MKT SALE
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho State University Foundation Inc

The mission of the Foundation is to stimulate voluntary private support from alumni, parents, friends, corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of the University and its students.

Education
2
College of Western Idaho Foundation Inc

The Foundation, an Internal Revenue Code ("Code") Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, supports the mission of the College through the development and creation of resources that will improve and (Continued on Schedule O)(Continued…

Philanthropy
3
Washington State University Foundation

The mission of the Foundation is to promote, accept, and maximize private support for programs, initiatives, and properties of Washington State University and its regional campuses. The Foundation also prudently manages, invests, and…

Education
4
The College of Idaho Inc

The College of Idaho, a private, residential liberal arts college, prepares students to lead productive and fulfilling lives. We are committed to an innovative, individualized curriculum in liberal arts and professional studies, to…

Education
5
Bozeman Deaconess Foundation

To support Bozeman Health Services by promoting community participation in and financial support of activities to improve community health and quality of life.

Philanthropy
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
University of Western States

The mission of the University of Western States is to advance the science and art of integrated health care through excellence in education and patient care.

Health
8
Idaho Ffa Foundation Inc

To Promote Premier Leadership, Personal Growth and Career Success of Idaho FFA Members and Agricultural Education Students by Providing Strategic Financial Resources for the Idaho FFA Association

Youth Development
9
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
10
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
11
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
12
Idaho Law Foundation Inc

The Idaho Law Foundation maintains a continuing legal education program and administers grants to 1) educate the public, 2) provide legal services to the state's indigent, 3) develop programs to improve the administration of justice and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Idaho Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Racing for Charity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH — $79,880 · OtherIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCHXROSSWAY LUTHERAN MINISTRIES INC — $26,190 · OtherXROSSWAY LUTHERAN MINISTRIES INCTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH — $15,000 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHBOISE STATE UNIVERSITY — $9,316 · OtherBOISE STATE UNIVERSITYCAMP PERKINS LOM INC — $9,000 · OtherCAMP PERKINS LOM INCCLOVER TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL — $7,000 · Other+11 more — $18,725 · Other+11 moreJae Foundation Inc — $56,800 · PhilanthropyJae Foundation IncBoise State University Foundation Inc — $5,000 · EducationTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $1,500 · Education+1 more — $200 · EducationIdaho Humane Society Inc — $5,000 · AnimalsRACING FOR CHARITY INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesRISING STARS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesVisions Charities Inc — $959 · HealthPROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $500 · Health
Other$165,111Philanthropy$56,800Education$6,700Animals$5,000Human Services$4,000Health$1,459

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJae Foundation Inc — $56,800 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetIdaho Humane Society Inc — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRACING FOR CHARITY INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION — $2,406 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISING STARS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVisions Charities Inc — $959 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jae Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Idaho Humane Society Inc
  • Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc
  • Who funds RACING FOR CHARITY INC
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE
  • Who funds RISING STARS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC
  • Who funds Visions Charities Inc
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds University of Idaho Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Samuel R Young FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Samuel R Young Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Martens Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Providence Portland Medical Foundation5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Martens Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Martens Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph