Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marten Charitable Foundation Corporation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$277k
Granted FY2019
11
Grants FY2019
7
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Marten Charitable Foundation Corporation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to University Of Notre Dame Du Lac, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Marten Charitable Foundation Corporation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $277k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
12
’18
6
’19
3
’20
2
’21
0
’22
1
’23
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$6.8MReligion$948kHealth$70kHousing & Shelter$45kHuman Services$17kEducation$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k7 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $245k
$1,300
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BISHOP SIMON BRUTE SEMINARY$100,000
OUR LADY OF FATIMA RETREAT HOUSE$75,000
Individual grant recipient$70,000
SMILE$25,000
ORDER OF MALTA$1,500
CHRIST THE KING$1,300
SACRED HEART MONASTERY$1,050
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY$1,000
BOY'S TOWN$1,000
ST JOSEPH INDIAN SCHOOL$500
ST LAWRENCE SEMINARY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOY'S TOWN: $1k → 12%BOY'S TOWN: $1k → 12%BOY'S TOWN: $1k → 12%ST MARY'S INDEPENDENT LIVING EXTENSIONS: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
SD
IN
NE
MD
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2019, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+180%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesReligionHealthRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    Our Lady of Fatima Retreat House Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $200k · revenue +27%
  • SO
    SEEDS OF HOPE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +52%
  • FF
    Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • MP
    Miracle Place Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +31%
  • SB
    ST BENEDICTS ABBEY
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marys House of Restoration

Marys house mission is to provide transitional living environment which provides residential care, individual and group counceling, assessment

—
2
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
3
Marys Homes Inc

Recovery home

Housing & Shelter
4
St Mary's Housing Corporaton
Housing & Shelter
5
St Joseph Infant and Maternity Home

With a 150+ year history, Saint Joe's is a place where people with developmental disabilities and complex support needs find connection, dignity and joy. Our community is built on compassion and possibility where every person is seen,…

Human Services
6
The Home for the Aged
—
7
Magnificat Houses Inc

Magnificat Houses, Inc. offers a welcoming community where those needing housing, food and mental health programs can grow in stability, productivity and independence.

Health
8
House of Mercy
Human Services
9
Little Sisters of the Poor of Indianapolis Inc

The home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in 1839 & serves the elderly in 31 countries. the st. augustine home, which provides nursing & residential care for (see…

Health
10
Holy Cross College Inc

Holy Cross College is a Catholic, residential liberal arts college located in Notre Dame, Indiana and is part of a tri campus community that includes the University of Notre Dame and Saint Mary's College. The College was founded in 1966 by…

Education
11
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
12
Mary Galloway Home
Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Lady of Fatima Retreat House Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Mary's Independent Living Extension. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac: $6,750,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacBISHOP SIMON BRUTE SEMINARY: $659,361 · OtherBISHOP SIMON …Individual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual gr…SMILE: $50,000 · OtherSMILECHRIST THE KING: $36,200 · Other+17 more: $110,920 · Other+17 moreOur Lady of Fatima Retreat House Inc: $200,000 · ReligionSEEDS OF HOPE INC: $20,000 · HealthST MARY'S INDEPENDENT LIVING EXTENSION: $15,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $3,000 · Human ServicesMiracle Place Inc: $4,000 · Community ImprovementINDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $150 · Recreation & Sports
Education$6,750,000Other$926,481Religion$200,000Health$20,000Human Services$18,000Community Improvement$4,000Recreation & Sports$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $6,750,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOur Lady of Fatima Retreat House Inc: $200,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetProgress House: $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetST MARY'S INDEPENDENT LIVING EXTENSION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMiracle Place Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Our Lady of Fatima Retreat House Inc ↗
  • Who funds Progress House ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S INDEPENDENT LIVING EXTENSION ↗
  • Who funds Miracle Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Indianapolis Foundation IncIN17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marten Charitable Foundation Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marten Charitable Foundation Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marten’s filings →

    More from the funding graph