Skip to content

· Private foundation

Martell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$83kFood & Nutrition$75kHealth$28kAnimals$12kHousing & Shelter$8kYouth Development$5kPhilanthropy$5kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $71k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC$25,000
ST PATRICK HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$10,500
A ROSIE PLACE$10,000
OUR LADY STAR OF THE SEA CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
MICHIGAN GATEWAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
THE ROADIE CLINIC INC$3,500
YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC$1,250
HUMANE SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY$750
LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $1k → 13%THE ROADIE CLINIC INC: $4k → 15%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $3k → 13%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$169k · 5 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$169k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-4%

Still filing today

80%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +34%
  • SP
    ST PATRICK HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k
  • OH
    O'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue -3%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - FITZGERALD INSTITUTE FOR REAL ESTATE
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • HN
    HOLY NAME CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL A CHESTERTON ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY FAMILY SERVICES (AKA CHALDEAN AMERICAN LADIES OF CHARITY)
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
2
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
3
Humane Fort Wayne Inc

Humane fort wayne is a trusted partner providing comprehensive, lifesaving resources to pets and their people.

Animals
4
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
5
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
6
Love From Louie Inc

It is the mission of, love from louie, to remove dogs that are suffering physically and emotionally inside the shelter system and provide them with complete medical care and a nurturing home environment to heal and rehabilitate before…

Animals
7
Oregon Humane Society

The oregon humane society ("ohs") is a private animal welfare organization, founded in 1868 and incorporated in 1880, whose mission is to create a more humane society with the vision of a world where all animals are treated with…

Animals
8
Lawrence Humane Society

The lawrence humane society nurtures the human-animal bond by providing shelter, care and advocacy for homeless and abused animals, as well as resource for the pets and people in our community

Animals
9
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
10
St Clair County Humane Society

Maintain and care for incoming animals.

Animals
11
Juneau Animal Rescue

To serve our community by promoting animal welfare and strengthening the animal-human bond. to improve the lives of pets through education and protection. to shelter stray, abandoned, and surrendered pets and find them loving homes.

Animals
12
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cultivate Culinary School and Catering Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PATRICK HIGH SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherST PATRICK HIGH SCHOOLOUR LADY STAR OF THE SEA CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherOUR LADY STAR OF THE SEA CATHOLIC SCHOOLTHE UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - FITZGERALD INSTITUTE FOR REAL ESTATE: $7,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - FITZGERALD …+4 more: $4,750 · Other+4 moreCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $75,000 · EmploymentCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING…O'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 · HealthO'HANA HERITAG…K9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $10,500 · AnimalsUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $10,000 · EducationYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $5,250 · Human ServicesTHE ROADIE CLINIC INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN GATEWAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$82,250Employment$75,000Health$27,500Animals$10,500Education$10,000Human Services$8,750Philanthropy$5,000Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetO'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $5,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN GATEWAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ROADIE CLINIC INC: $3,500 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC 1141106 CHET WAGGONER LL: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of St Joseph County IncIN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Martell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph