· Private foundation
Marjorie E Conrad Md Reserve Charitable
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $208k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES | $84,119 |
| BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIV FOUNDATION | $67,296 |
| COCOON SHELTER | $56,589 |
| TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION | $18,353 |
| WOODLANE FOUNDATION INC | $18,353 |
| WOOD COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $12,236 |
| CAMP COURAGEOUS & THE ARC OF NW OH INC | $9,177 |
| NOTRE DAME ACADEMY | $9,177 |
| SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC | $9,177 |
| BOWLING GREEN PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION | $6,118 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF NORTHWEST OHIO | $6,118 |
| BITTERSWEET AUTISM FOUNDATION | $6,118 |
| WOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $3,059 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $499k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBowling Green State University Foundation Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $620k · revenue +39%
- TCTHE COCOON SHELTER9× · 2017–2025 · $246k · revenue +140%
- TTTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +304%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide safe, low-cost housing to individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities in wood county
To raise funds and invest related assets to benefit the wood county committee on aging, inc. in its mission to improve the lives of seniors in wood county, ohio.
Wayne state university foundation was established to be a centralized means of encouraging and managing financial support to wayne state university. this support allows wayne state university to provide its students, faculty, and…
The mission of the foundation is to help ensure that wood county hospital has the resources needed to successfully accomplish its strategic vision and meet the healthcare challenges facing the community it serves.
Perform fundraising functions, provide financial support, carryout the purpose and otherwise operating for the benefit of the zoological society of cincinnati.
To facilitate receipt of life income gifts for future benefit of Butler University.
The mission of the akron zoological foundation, inc. is to directly benefit and provide support for programs, projects and to further the mission of the akron zoological park in conservation, education and serving the community.
Wood lane residental services will provide individuals with the highest quality of life enhancement opportunities in residential environments by: respecting individuals; ensuring choices and options; supporting families; and providing…
Woods Services Foundation provides funds for Woods Services, Inc. and related entities to promote innovation and further enhance the comprehensive healthcare, behavioral health, education, workforce, vocational training, and care…
We inspire our guests to join us in being advocates for wildlife and conserving the natural world by providing fun, awe-inspiring, and educational experiences. by joining us, others help build a movement that cares for animals and creates…
None
To apply all or any part of its income or principal exclusively for charitable, scientific, literary or educational purposes with the object of: 1)fostering and maintaining the honor and integrity of the profession of the law. 2)improving…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wood Lane Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DENTAL CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
- Who funds CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE COCOON SHELTER ↗
- Who funds WOOD LANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOOD COUNTY DISTRICT LIBRARY FOUNDA ↗
- Who funds BOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BITTERSWEET AUTISM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Toledo · The O-I Charities Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marjorie E Conrad Md Reserve Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.