Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marjorie E Conrad Md Reserve Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$306k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$817kHealth$721kHousing & Shelter$640kHuman Services$302kAnimals$197kYouth Development$85kRecreation & Sports$56k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $208k
$9,177
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES$84,119
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIV FOUNDATION$67,296
COCOON SHELTER$56,589
TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION$18,353
WOODLANE FOUNDATION INC$18,353
WOOD COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$12,236
SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC$9,177
CAMP COURAGEOUS & THE ARC OF NW OH INC$9,177
NOTRE DAME ACADEMY$9,177
BITTERSWEET AUTISM FOUNDATION$6,118
BOWLING GREEN PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION$6,118
THE SALVATION ARMY OF NORTHWEST OHIO$6,118
WOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$3,059
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $499k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%COCOON SHELTER: $57k → 12%COCOON SHELTER: $57k → 12%SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 18%SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 18%COCOON SHELTER: $22k → 12%SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 18%WOODLANE FOUNDATION INC: $22k → 12%Sunshine Foundation Inc: $10k → 18%COCOON SHELTER: $22k → 12%SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 18%WOODLANE FOUNDATION INC: $22k → 12%SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 18%COCOON SHELTER: $21k → 12%SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 18%WOODLANE FOUNDATION INC: $21k → 12%Sunshine Foundation Inc: $8k → 18%Wood Lane Foundation Inc: $20k → 12%Sunshine Foundation Inc: $7k → 18%Cocoon Shelter: $20k → 12%WOODLANE FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 12%WOODLANE FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 12%COCOON SHELTER: $18k → 12%WOODLANE FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 12%Cocoon Shelter: $15k → 12%Wood Lane Foundation Inc: $15k → 12%Wood Lane Foundation Inc: $14k → 12%Cocoon Shelter: $14k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 18 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
0

Total granted

$2.8M
$0

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $620k · revenue +39%
  • TC
    THE COCOON SHELTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $246k · revenue +140%
  • TT
    THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +304%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Wood Lane Residential Properties

    Provide safe, low-cost housing to individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities in wood county

    Housing & Shelter
    2
    Friends of Wood County Committee On Aging Inc

    To raise funds and invest related assets to benefit the wood county committee on aging, inc. in its mission to improve the lives of seniors in wood county, ohio.

    Human Services
    3
    Wayne State University Foundation

    Wayne state university foundation was established to be a centralized means of encouraging and managing financial support to wayne state university. this support allows wayne state university to provide its students, faculty, and…

    Education
    4
    Wood County Hospital Foundation

    The mission of the foundation is to help ensure that wood county hospital has the resources needed to successfully accomplish its strategic vision and meet the healthcare challenges facing the community it serves.

    —
    5
    Cincinnati Zoo Foundation Inc

    Perform fundraising functions, provide financial support, carryout the purpose and otherwise operating for the benefit of the zoological society of cincinnati.

    Animals
    6
    Butler Foundation

    To facilitate receipt of life income gifts for future benefit of Butler University.

    Education
    7
    The Akron Zoological Foundation Inc

    The mission of the akron zoological foundation, inc. is to directly benefit and provide support for programs, projects and to further the mission of the akron zoological park in conservation, education and serving the community.

    Animals
    8
    Wood Lane Residential Services

    Wood lane residental services will provide individuals with the highest quality of life enhancement opportunities in residential environments by: respecting individuals; ensuring choices and options; supporting families; and providing…

    Human Services
    9
    Woods Services Foundation

    Woods Services Foundation provides funds for Woods Services, Inc. and related entities to promote innovation and further enhance the comprehensive healthcare, behavioral health, education, workforce, vocational training, and care…

    Philanthropy
    10
    The Toledo Zoological Society

    We inspire our guests to join us in being advocates for wildlife and conserving the natural world by providing fun, awe-inspiring, and educational experiences. by joining us, others help build a movement that cares for animals and creates…

    Animals
    11
    Sunset Legacy Foundation

    None

    Human Services
    12
    Toledo Bar Association Foundation

    To apply all or any part of its income or principal exclusively for charitable, scientific, literary or educational purposes with the object of: 1)fostering and maintaining the honor and integrity of the profession of the law. 2)improving…

    Community Improvement
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wood Lane Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/11
    Grantees still filing
    7/11
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    DENTAL CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $551,418 · OtherDENTAL CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIONOTRE DAME ACADEMY: $84,568 · OtherNOTRE DAME ACADEMYCAMP COURAGEOUS & THE ARC OF NW OH INC: $60,087 · OtherCAMP COURAGEOUS & THE ARC OF NW OH…Toledo Zoological Society Foundatio: $48,961 · OtherToledo Zoological Society Foundati…THE SALVATION ARMY OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $40,057 · OtherWood County Public Library Foundati: $32,642 · Other+2 more: $40,802 · OtherBowling Green State University Foundation Inc: $620,156 · EducationBowling Green State Universi…WOOD COUNTY DISTRICT LIBRARY FOUNDA: $80,115 · EducationWOOD COUNTY DISTRICT LIBRARY…THE COCOON SHELTER: $245,785 · Human ServicesTHE COCOON SHELTERWOOD LANE FOUNDATION INC: $169,132 · Human ServicesWOOD LANE FOUNDATION…SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $84,568 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE FOUNDATION …CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES: $499,484 · Housing & ShelterCHERRY STREET MISSIO…THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $120,171 · AnimalsWOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $28,189 · AnimalsBOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION: $56,378 · Recreation & SportsBITTERSWEET AUTISM FOUNDATION INC: $56,378 · Philanthropy
    Other$858,535Education$700,271Human Services$499,485Housing & Shelter$499,484Animals$148,360Recreation & Sports$56,378Philanthropy$56,378

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBowling Green State University Foundation Inc: $620,156 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetDENTAL CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $551,418 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetCHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES: $499,484 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetTHE COCOON SHELTER: $245,785 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetWOOD LANE FOUNDATION INC: $169,132 over 9y, 28% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $120,171 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $84,568 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetWOOD COUNTY DISTRICT LIBRARY FOUNDA: $80,115 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetBOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION: $56,378 over 9y, 5.4% of budgetBITTERSWEET AUTISM FOUNDATION INC: $56,378 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetWOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $28,189 over 9y, 1.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc ↗
    • Who funds DENTAL CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
    • Who funds CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
    • Who funds THE COCOON SHELTER ↗
    • Who funds WOOD LANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds WOOD COUNTY DISTRICT LIBRARY FOUNDA ↗
    • Who funds BOWLING GREEN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds BITTERSWEET AUTISM FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds WOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Toledo Community Foundation IncOH21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Toledo · The O-I Charities Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Marjorie E Conrad Md Reserve Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marjorie E Conrad Md Reserve Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Marjorie E Conrad Md Reserve’s filings →

      More from the funding graph