Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Mariucci Family Foundation

The foundation will make grants to charities having proven track records of delivering services to and supporting underserved youth and their families by providing access to sports, recreational and therapeutic programs, nutrition, education and healthcare.

$484k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$137k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$1.2MRecreation & Sports$356kPublic Safety & Disaster$145kArts & Culture$116kEducation$115kHealth$35kReligion$25k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $374,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $484,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $110,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $299k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CA$137,000
BEACON HOUSE$112,000
THE LOS GATOS-MONTE SERENO POLICE FOUNDATION$50,000
CREATIVETS$40,000
SANTA CLARA FIRE FIGHTERS FOUNDATION$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOOTBALL CAMP FOR THE STARS: $10k → 8%FOOTBALL CAMP FOR THE STARS: $10k → 8%FOOTBALL CAMP FOR THE STARS: $10k → 8%FOOTBALL CAMP FOR THE STARS: $10k → 8%FOOTBALL CAMP FOR THE STARS: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Mariucci Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 36% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Mariucci Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 9 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$1.9M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+42%

Still filing today

89%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF THE UPPER PENINSULA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +167% · 35% of their budget
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $311k · revenue +5%
  • LG
    LOS GATOS-MONTE SERENO POLICE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +613% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • CP
    CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • LG
    LOS GATOS HIGH SCHOOL NEW MILLENNIUM FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • IM
    IRON MOUNTAIN ROAD & TRAIL HALF MARATHON
    one grant, 2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Cruz Foundation

To benefit the university of california santa cruz.

Education
2
San Francisco Fire Fighters Cancer Prevention Foundation

San francisco firefighters cancer prevention foundation (sffcpf) is committed to the prevention and early detection of cancer and providing access to cutting edge care for active and retired members of the san francisco fire department and…

Health
3
Valley Health Foundation (Vhf)

Valley health foundation (vhf) is a non-profit leader in community health and healthcare that fundraises to support, innovate, and advocate for better health for all in santa clara county. vhf helps patients, families, and dedicated…

Health
4
Symons Family Fund

The Mission of the Symons Family Fund is to benefit, perform the functions of, and carry out the purposes of the Sonora Area Foundation that engage in charitable activities which benefit the residents of Tuolumne County, California.

Human Services
5
Montecito Firefighters Charitable Foundation

To provide relief to those facing hardship based upon financial or other need, with the primary focus on first responders and their families and all children.

Unclassified
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Kiwanis Club of Los Altos Foundation

Kiwanis is a global organization of volunteers dedicated to changing the world one child and one community at a time.

Community Improvement
8
San Francisco Police Community Foundation

The san francisco police community foundation (sfpcf) is a 501(c)3 benevolent organization dedicated to supporting the san francisco police department, while helping to strengthen the connectivity between officers and the broader…

Philanthropy
9
Sebastopol Firefighters Foundation

The specific purpose of the Foundation is to support the Sebastopol Fire Department and its firefighters; the activities and needs of the community of Sebastopol; and in cases of disaster and/or traumatic events, other first responders or…

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Claremont Police Foundation

Supporting and enhancing the crucial work of the Claremont Police Department

Philanthropy
11
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
12
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Northern California Inc and the most unlike its peers is Football Camp for the Stars. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF THE UPPER PENINSULA — $1,222,000 · HealthHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF THE UPPER PENINSULASPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $310,900 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS N…THE TAYLOR FAMILY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY — $25,000 · OtherIRON MOUNTAIN ROAD & TRAIL HALF MARATHON — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $5,000 · OtherMONTALVO ASSOCIATION — $71,000 · Arts & CultureCREATIVETS — $45,000 · Arts & CultureLOS GATOS-MONTE SERENO POLICE FOUNDATION — $110,000 · Crime & LegalSANTA CLARA FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION — $35,000 · PhilanthropyDICKINSON COUNTY CANCER UNIT — $15,000 · PhilanthropyFOOTBALL CAMP FOR THE STARS — $45,000 · Human ServicesLOS GATOS HIGH SCHOOL NEW MILLENNIUM FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Education
Health$1,222,000Recreation & Sports$325,900Other$135,000Arts & Culture$116,000Crime & Legal$110,000Philanthropy$50,000Human Services$45,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF THE UPPER PENINSULA — $1,222,000 over 9y, 35% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $310,900 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLOS GATOS-MONTE SERENO POLICE FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetMONTALVO ASSOCIATION — $71,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCREATIVETS — $45,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFOOTBALL CAMP FOR THE STARS — $45,000 over 6y, 54% of budgetTHE TAYLOR FAMILY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDICKINSON COUNTY CANCER UNIT — $15,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetLOS GATOS HIGH SCHOOL NEW MILLENNIUM FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA14.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mariucci Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph