Skip to content
Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx at a glance

· Private foundation

Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$22kEducation$11kHousing & Shelter$11kArts & Culture$9kRecreation & Sports$9kAnimals$8kYouth Development$4kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,350
Median grant
1
States reached
$161k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NH MUSCULOSKELETAL INSTITUTE$2,150
THE GREATER WAKEFIELD RESOURCE CENTER$2,150
CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND NH$1,350
HARBOR HOMES INC$1,350
CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE$1,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%RISE AGAIN OUTREACH: $3k → 7%THE GREATER WAKEFIELD RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 9%RISE AGAIN OUTREACH: $2k → 7%RISE AGAIN OUTREACH: $2k → 7%HUNDRED NIGHTS INC: $5k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $4k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $2k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $2k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NH; by stated purpose, 94%.

Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxxlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57k · 10 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$57k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-11%

Still filing today

60%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    New Hampshire Catholic Charities
    6× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +25%
  • JH
    JOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS
    5× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +136%
  • NE
    New England College
    3× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • HN
    HUNDRED NIGHTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -59%
  • HA
    Healthy at Home Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -45%
  • MC
    MERRIMACK CONCERT ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Nashua Council on Alcoholism Keystone Hall

The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.

Health
2
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…

—
3
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Helping Hands Outreach Ministries Inc

Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.

Housing & Shelter
5
Vna Home Health and Hospice Services Inc

We are dedicated to advancing care at home through personal empowerment, compassion, and exceptional service.

Health
6
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
7
Manchester Alcoholism Rehabilitation Center

Helping individuals and families find their way to a life free of the effects of alcohol and other drugs through comprehensive treatment and recovery services open to all.

Health
8
Manchester Health Services Inc

Home Health Care

—
9
Vermont Congregational Home Inc

Retirement Home - Operation of church sponsored retirement home with 13 rooms and care for up to 15 residents

Human Services
10
Community Council of Nashua Nh Inc

Empowering people to lead full and satisfying lives through effective treatment and support.

Health
11
The Homestead Inc
—
12
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hundred Nights Inc; the most unlike its peers is Merrimack Concert Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
8/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NH MUSCULOSKELETAL INSTITUTE: $9,300 · OtherNH MUSCULOSKELETAL INSTITUTESTRAWBERY BANKE INC: $3,850 · OtherSTRAWBERY BANKE INCHealthy at Home Inc: $3,000 · OtherHealthy at Home IncMERRIMACK CONCERT ASSOCIATION: $2,973 · OtherMERRIMACK CONCERT ASSOCIATIONNew Hampshire Furniture Masters Association: $2,500 · OtherNew Hampshire Furniture Masters Associati…GYO: $2,400 · OtherGYOD ACRES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $2,250 · OtherD ACRES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INCCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND NH: $1,350 · OtherMAPS COUNSELING SERVICES: $1,000 · Other+2 more: $1,300 · OtherNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $12,062 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic CharitiesRISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC: $7,508 · Human ServicesRISE AGAIN OUTREACH INCHUNDRED NIGHTS INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesHUNDRED NIGHTS INCGREATER WAKEFIELD RESOURCE CENTER: $2,150 · Human ServicesGREATER WAKEFIELD RESOURCE CENTERJOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS: $8,050 · AnimalsJOHN HAY ES…New England College: $6,350 · EducationNew Englan…NASHUA ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,000 · EducationNASHUA ADU…Harbor Homes Inc: $4,350 · Housing & ShelterFLEUR DE LIS CAMP INC: $2,250 · Recreation & SportsPEMI YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentKEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$29,923Human Services$26,220Animals$8,050Education$7,350Housing & Shelter$4,350Recreation & Sports$2,250Youth Development$2,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $12,062 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS: $8,050 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC: $7,508 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetNew England College: $6,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUNDRED NIGHTS INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHarbor Homes Inc: $4,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHealthy at Home Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLEUR DE LIS CAMP INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetD ACRES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $2,250 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMAPS COUNSELING SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNASHUA ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiberty House Inc: $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Cogswell Benevolent T…Trust Uw Oleonda Jame…Agnes M Lindsay TrustJames F Kelly and Fer…Arthur Jr Dobles & Ol…Lizzie J Cheney Chari…The McIninch Foundati…Eversource Energy Fou…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH28.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · James F Kelly and Fernande Kelly Charitable · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Lizzie J Cheney Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · The McIninch Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marion C Cohen Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home