Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Marin General Hospital

To be the destination for health and healing in the north bay.

$36M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$36M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$209MCommunity Improvement$153kRecreation & Sports$100kArts & Culture$73kInternational$50kEducation$10kScience & Tech$5k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $250k+1 grant · $36M
$6,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$709M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION$36,121,367
PECOS LEAGUE OF PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL CLUB$20,000
SAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$6,500
LARKSPUR CHAMBER OF COMMMERCE$5,250
PETALUMA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,025
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARIN COUNTY FAIR: $25k → 8%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $25k → 9%EVENTS MANAGEMENT INC: $6k → 10%MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC DBA DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $50k → 17%TALIA'S VOICE PROJECTS FOR PATIENT SAFETY: $10k → 15%MARIN ECONOMIC FORUM: $10k → 8%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $25k → 9%MARIN ECONOMIC FORUM: $10k → 8%MARIN ECONOMIC FORUM: $10k → 8%MARIN ECONOMIC FORUM: $10k → 8%MARIN ECONOMIC FORUM: $10k → 8%CONVERGENCEMEDIA PRODUCTIONS LLC: $5k → 8%PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $36.1M → 8%PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $27.9M → 8%PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $27.7M → 8%PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $27.4M → 8%PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $22.6M → 8%PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $20.6M → 8%PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $11.7M → 8%PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $7.7M → 8%MARIN HEALTHCARE DISTRICT: $15.4M → 8%MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10k → 8%LARKSPUR CHAMBER OF COMMMERCE: $5k → 8%TEDXMARINORG PARTNERSHIP: $6k → 8%TEDXMARINORG PARTNERSHIP: $6k → 8%TEDXMARINORG PARTNERSHIP: $6k → 8%ANGELO & GARNETS CONSULTING: $13k → 8%PETALUMA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5k → 8%MARIN HEALTHCARE DISTRICT: $11.4M → 8%BUZZ BASEBALL LLC: $18k → 8%THE CALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE: $15k → 8%REDWOOD SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC: $15k → 8%REDWOOD SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC: $15k → 8%THE CALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE: $15k → 8%SAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $12k → 8%SAN RAFAEL PACIFICS: $12k → 8%SAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $12k → 8%DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $10k → 8%SAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8k → 8%SAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7k → 8%SAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 8%SAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 8%SAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 8%SAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$209M · 9 repeat orgs$189k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$209M
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+11%

Still filing today

56%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $182M · revenue +428% · 26% of their budget
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +53%
  • CF
    CALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +13%
  • CO
    COUNTY OF MARIN
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • BB
    BUZZ BASEBALL LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $18k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Chamber of Commerce

Represent members and cal employers to members of cal legislature and other agencies of state government through in-house legislative analysts, lobbying staff, and contract lobbyists. cal chamber publishes books and software related to…

2
Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce

To advocate and represent business' interests in issues affecting the community of santa monica, california.

3
San Francisco Chamber of Commerce

To attract, develop, and retain business in san francisco.

4
Los Altos Chamber of Commerce

To encourage and promote businesses and to stimulate a vibrant economy in los altos and los altos hills.

5
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

6
Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce

The sacramento metropolitan chamber of commerce advocates for and supports economic success of its members and the six-county capital region by leading the effort to grow and retain business.

7
Monterra Credit Union

Passionately deliver relevant products, services, and education tailored to help our members, employees, and communities achieve their financial goals.

Public Benefit
8
Marin General Hospital

To be the destination for health and healing in the north bay.

Health
9
San Marcos Area Chamber of Commerce

To improve the economic well being of the greater san marcos area

10
Montana Chamber of Commerce

To create and sustain an optimal business climate, business prosperity and a strong montana economy through advocacy, education and collaboration, working to provide an empowered and educated workforce, reduce business growth obstacles,…

11
Santa Clara County Medical Association

To promote the common interest of medical doctors in santa clara county.

12
Los Angeles County Medical Association

To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Rafael Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $181,723,543 · HealthPRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION+2 more — $60,000 · HealthMARIN HEALTHCARE DISTRICT — $26,813,976 · OtherMARIN HEALTHCA…+15 more — $262,823 · OtherMARIN ECONOMIC FORUM — $50,000 · Community ImprovementLarkspur Chamber of Commerce — $5,250 · Community ImprovementMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50,000 · InternationalCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE — $30,000 · Arts & CultureDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $10,000 · Education
Health$181,783,543Other$27,076,799Community Improvement$55,250International$50,000Arts & Culture$30,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $181,723,543 over 8y, 26% of budgetSAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $62,510 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetMARIN ECONOMIC FORUM — $50,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLarkspur Chamber of Commerce — $5,250 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetPETALUMA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $5,025 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAN RAFAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds MARIN ECONOMIC FORUM
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE
  • Who funds DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC
  • Who funds Larkspur Chamber of Commerce
  • Who funds PETALUMA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leonard & Beryl Buck FoundationMO15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marin General Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph