Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marilyn Kass Cicero and Arthur Bcicero Tzedakah Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$17kFood & Nutrition$7kHousing & Shelter$5kHealth$3kInternational$3kArts & Culture$1kHuman Services$1kEducation$966Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$52
Median grant
7
States reached
$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Temple Isaiah$2,366
Project Bread$216
Greater Boston Food Bank$107
Individual grant recipient$105
Food Link$103
Project Ezra$103
elm street school$78
Novant Health Foundation$52
Individual grant recipient$50
Childrens miracle netword$47
Burlington High School Junior Class$31
Individual grant recipient$30
Center School PTO$29
Individual grant recipient$25
Jewish National Fund$18
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $509) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Project Ezra: $103 → 17%People Helping People: $303 → 8%The Childrens Room: $103 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
NJ
CA
UT
VA
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29k · 17 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
33

Total granted

$29k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+40%

Still filing today

53%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $394 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +1%
  • CZ
    COMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND
    3× · 2021–2023 · $531 · revenue +55%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $368 · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • WT
    WANG THEATRE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -39%
  • BF
    Burlington Food Pantry
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
Wgbh Educational Foundation

WGBH enriches people's lives through programs and services that educate, inspire, and entertain, fostering citizenship and culture, the joy of learning, and the power of diverse perspectives.

Arts & Culture
9
Gastric Cancer Foundation

The gastric cancer foundation helps patients to face their diagnosis with reliable information, tools to navigate the journey, and a compassionate community that truly understands. the foundation funds research initiatives that contribute…

Health
10
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
12
Massachusetts Medical Society

To advance medical knowledge, to develop and maintain the highest professional and ethical standards of medical practice and health care, and to promote medical institutions formed on liberal principles for the health, benefit, and welfare…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Bread-the Walk for Hunger Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE ISAIAH: $17,359 · OtherTEMPLE ISAIAHIndividual grant recipient: $5,140 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,675 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $1,967 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC+43 more: $8,440 · Other+43 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $3,278 · InternationalWANG THEATRE INC: $1,245 · Arts & CultureFOOD LINK INC: $743 · Food & NutritionPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $260 · Food & NutritionPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE INC: $303 · Human ServicesThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children: $206 · Human ServicesProject Ezra: $103 · Human ServicesCOMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND: $531 · AnimalsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $368 · HealthCure Sanfilippo Foundation: $106 · Health
Other$35,581International$3,278Arts & Culture$1,245Food & Nutrition$1,003Human Services$612Animals$531Health$474

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $3,278 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $1,967 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWANG THEATRE INC: $1,245 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD LINK INC: $743 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND: $531 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $390 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $368 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE INC: $303 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $260 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $235 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children: $206 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER SCHOOL PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION INC: $184 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCure Sanfilippo Foundation: $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ezra: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WANG THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LINK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children ↗
  • Who funds CENTER SCHOOL PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cure Sanfilippo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Project Ezra ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Analog Devices FoundationMA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Analog Devices Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marilyn Kass Cicero and Arthur Bcicero Tzedakah Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marilyn Kass Cicero and Arthur Bcicero Tzedakah Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Food Link Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marilyn Kass Cicero and Arthur Bcicero Tzedakah Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Marilyn Kass Cicero and Arthur Bcicero Tzedakah Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marilyn Kass Cicero and Arthur Bcicero Tzedakah’s filings →

More from the funding graph