Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marie H Hamilton Scholarship Trust Fund

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$811k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$780k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Education$905k
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k10 grants · $31k
  • $250k+1 grant · $780k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR$779,880
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON - SEATTLE$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS$5,000
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$3,000
LINFIELD COLLEGE$3,000
CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$2,500
GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$2,000
PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$1,500
PORTLAND BEAUTY SCHOOL$1,000
WASHINGTON STATE - PULLMAN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 6% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%LEWIS-CLARK STATE COLLEGE: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%PACIFIC NORTHWEST COLLEGE: $500 → 12%WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%CLATSOP COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 13%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON - SEATTLE: $8k → 9%CLARK COLLEGE: $1k → 9%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%GRAYS HARBOR COLLEGE: $2k → 18%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 8%LINFIELD COLLEGE: $3k → 11%PORTLAND BEAUTY SCHOOL: $1k → 12%CLATSOP COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $500 → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $5k → 9%CLARK COLLEGE: $1k → 9%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%EASTERN WASHINGTON: $1k → 12%LINFIELD COLLEGE: $2k → 11%CLATSOP COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $500 → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $2k → 9%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR: $780k → 9%INTERNATIONAL AIR & HOSPITALITY: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 8 repeat orgs$828k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$77k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+24%

Still filing today

13%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $801k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
EducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WASHINGTON STATE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $36k
  • BS
    BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $12k
  • CW
    CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2022 · $10k

Funded once

  • LS
    LEWIS-CLARK STATE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • WO
    WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • NN
    NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pacific Union College

Seventh-day adventist college providing christ-centered education.

Education
2
Pacific Lutheran University

Plu purposefully integrates the liberal arts, professional studies & civic engagement through distinctive international programs & faculty mentored research opportunities.

Education
3
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
4
Seattle Pacific University

Seattle Pacific University is a Christian university fully committed to engaging the culture and changing the world by graduating people of competence and character, becoming people of wisdom, and modeling grace-filled community.

Education
5
Northwestern College

Institution of Higher Education providing postsecondary educational services, including both graduate and undergraduate programs.

Education
6
The University of Puget Sound

Develop students to sustain intellectual curiosity, active inquiry, & reasoned independence

Education
7
Northcentral University

The organization is a post-secondary level educational institution.

—
8
Hawaii Pacific University

Hpu is an international learning community set in the rich cultural context of hawaii. our innovative programs prepare our graduates as active members of a global society.

Education
9
National University

National university is a post secondary level educational institution.

Education
10
University of Portland

The University of Portland, an independently governed Catholic university guided by the Congregation of Holy Cross, addresses significant questions of human concern through interdisciplinary studies of the arts, sciences, and humanities…

Education
11
University of Northwestern - St Paul

We seek to reach all nations for jesus, through christ-centered higher education and media.

Education
12
North Central University

To train and prepare leaders to serve their community, church, and world according to their vocation and gifts.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is George Fox University; the most unlike its peers is University of Redlands. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR: $779,880 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FORWASHINGTON STATE: $35,700 · Other+18 more: $69,650 · Other+18 moreUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5,000 · EducationLinfield University: $4,500 · EducationNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC: $4,150 · EducationCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationGRAYS HARBOR COLLEGE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS: $1,500 · Employment
Other$885,230Education$18,650Employment$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC: $4,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds Linfield University ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GRAYS HARBOR COLLEGE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wf & Blanche E West Educational & Coffman JfWA13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wf & Blanche E West Educational & Coffman Jf · Leo Adler Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marie H Hamilton Scholarship Trust Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marie H Hamilton Scholarship Trust Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Pacific University: 5% of income from government
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • George Fox University: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marie H Hamilton Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph