Skip to content

· Private foundation

Margery Mayo Bird Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$168k
Granted FY2018
12
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Education$5.5MArts & Culture$1.7MReligion$816kEnvironment$82kHealth$76k
02FY2018 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k8 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$8,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$77,280
HOLLAND HALL SCHOOL$33,600
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$16,800
TULSA BALLETT THEATER INC$10,080
PHILBROOK ENDOWMENT TRUST$8,400
TULSA OPERA INC$8,400
TULSA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,040
UP WITH TREES INC$1,680
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA - GILCREASE MUSEUM$1,680
TULSA LIBRARY TRUST$1,680
TULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC$1,680
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION TULSA CHAPTER$1,680
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF TULSA - GILCREASE MUSEUM: $80k → 14%PHILBROOK ENDOWMENT TRUST: $400k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF TULSA - GILCREASE MUSEUM: $2k → 14%TULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $80k → 15%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION TULSA CHAPTER: $74k → 15%PHILBROOK ENDOWMENT TRUST: $8k → 15%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION TULSA CHAPTER: $2k → 15%TULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2k → 15%TULSA BALLETT THEATER INC: $480k → 15%TULSA BALLETT THEATER INC: $10k → 15%TULSA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $240k → 15%TULSA LIBRARY TRUST: $80k → 15%TULSA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $3.7M → 15%TULSA LIBRARY TRUST: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $77k → 15%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $799k → 15%TULSA OPERA INC: $400k → 15%UP WITH TREES INC: $80k → 15%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $17k → 15%TULSA OPERA INC: $8k → 15%UP WITH TREES INC: $2k → 15%HOLLAND HALL SCHOOL: $1.6M → 15%HOLLAND HALL SCHOOL: $34k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$8.2M
$0

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The University of Tulsa
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3.8M · revenue +8%
  • TB
    TULSA BALLET THEATRE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $490k · revenue +73%
  • TULSA OPERA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $408k · revenue +100%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    7/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    The University of Tulsa: $3,753,545 · EducationThe University of Tulsa+1 more: $81,598 · EducationHOLLAND HALL: $1,631,978 · OtherHOLLAND HALLFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $815,988 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHPHILBROOK ENDOWMENT TRUST: $407,997 · OtherPHILBROOK ENDOWMENT TRUST+3 more: $239,191 · Other+3 moreTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $489,595 · Arts & CultureTULSA BALLET THEA…TULSA OPERA INC: $407,997 · Arts & CultureTULSA OPERA INCTulsa Symphony Orchestra Inc: $244,795 · Arts & CultureTulsa Symphony Or…TULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $81,598 · Arts & CultureTULSA HISTORICAL …
    Education$3,835,143Other$3,095,154Arts & Culture$1,223,985

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe University of Tulsa: $3,753,545 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $489,595 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetTULSA OPERA INC: $407,997 over 2y, 19% of budgetTulsa Symphony Orchestra Inc: $244,795 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetTulsa Library Trust: $81,598 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $81,598 over 2y, 11% of budgetUP WITH TREES INC: $81,598 over 2y, 7.8% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
    • Who funds TULSA BALLET THEATRE INC ↗
    • Who funds TULSA OPERA INC ↗
    • Who funds Tulsa Symphony Orchestra Inc ↗
    • Who funds Tulsa Library Trust ↗
    • Who funds TULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
    • Who funds UP WITH TREES INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Sneed Foundation IncOK20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Sneed Foundation Inc · The Gelvin Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · James D & Cathryn M Moore Foundation · The Barnett Family Foundation Inc Ms Billie Barnett · The Charles & Marion Weber Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Margery Mayo Bird Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margery Mayo Bird Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
    • Up With Trees Inc: 100% of income from government
    • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    1rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Margery Mayo Bird’s filings →

    More from the funding graph