Skip to content

· Private foundation

Margaret Evans Tuten Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$60kArts & Culture$54kFood & Nutrition$28kAnimals$12kYouth Development$10kPhilanthropy$9kHealth$8kReligion$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$500k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
WAYNE ART CENTER$3,000
RALEIGH TAVERN SOCIETY$2,500
WILLISTOWN CONSERVATION TRUST$2,500
WOODMERE ART MUSEUM$2,500
INLIQUID$1,000
SCHUYLKILL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION$1,000
PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY$1,000
BRYN MAWR PRESTBYTERIAN CHURCH$500
BARNES FOUNDATION$260
BRYN MAWR FILM INSTITUTE$250
BARNSTABLE LAND TRUST$250
GARDEN CONSERVANCY$150
NATURAL LANDS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMPACT OF CAPE COD CONSERVATION TST: $2k → 8%MARIAN INSTITUTE: $2k → 8%MASSACHUSETTES AUDUBON: $3k → 8%NEW BEDFORD WHALING MUSEUM: $1k → 11%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $5k → 11%UNION CHAPEL: $4k → 15%INLIQUID: $2k → 22%ORANGUTAN FNDN INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 14%WILD ONES: $2k → 11%GREENWICH FILM FESTIVAL: $2k → 9%MISS PORTERS-FARMINGTON FOUNDERS: $7k → 11%SEA SHEPHERD: $2k → 6%COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG: $5k → 7%RIVERBEND ENVIRONMENTAL ED: $2k → 7%WESTERN PA CONSERVANCY: $2k → 11%GREENWICH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL: $2k → 9%MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL: $5k → 11%COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG: $5k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS AUDOBON: $2k → 8%WESTERN PA CONSERVANCY: $2k → 11%MISS PORTERS-FARMINGTON FOUNDERS: $2k → 11%WILLIAMSBUG RALEIGH TAVERN: $3k → 7%WOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $15k → 22%RALEIGH TAVERN SOCIETY: $3k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS AUDOBON: $2k → 8%WAYNE ART CENTER: $7k → 6%MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBONLONG PASTURE: $3k → 8%WAYNE ART CENTER: $5k → 6%WOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $3k → 22%WAYNE ART CENTER: $3k → 6%WOODS HOLE RESEARCH CENTER: $2k → 8%WAYNE ART CENTER: $3k → 6%WOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $2k → 22%WAYNE ART CENTER: $3k → 6%WILLOWS PARK PRESERVE: $5k → 10%WILLISTOWN CONSERVATION TRUST: $20k → 10%WILLISTOWN CONSERVATION TRUST: $3k → 10%PA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $10k → 22%PA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $6k → 22%HERITAGE MUSEUM: $3k → 8%PA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $5k → 22%UNION CHAPEL ASSOCIATION: $3k → 8%PHILADELPHIA ZOO: $4k → 22%PHILADELPHIA ZOO: $3k → 22%SCHUYLKILL VALLEY NATURE CENTER: $2k → 22%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%CHOP FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%ARTZ PHILADELPHIA: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$188k · 38 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
53

Total granted

$188k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+17%

Still filing today

47%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Willistown Conservation Trust Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +60%
  • WA
    Wayne Art Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +111%
  • WA
    WOODMERE ART MUSEUM
    5× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • MP
    MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +19%
  • WP
    WILLOWS PARK PRESERVEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Glen Foerd Conservation Corporation

Glen foerd stewards an eclectic riverfront estate for the enjoyment and educational benefit of the community. drawing from the estate's architecture, art, material culture, and history-as well as its gardens and waterways-glen foerd…

Environment
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
4
Natural History Institute

Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…

Arts & Culture
5
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
6
The Forest Park Conservancy

To protect and restore the ecological health of forest park and marquam nature park, maintain and enhance their extensive trails networks, promote equitable access, and inspire diverse community appreciation and stewardship of these iconic…

Environment
7
The Trustees of Reservations

Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.

Environment
8
Jenkins Arboretum & Gardens

The mission of the jenkins arboretum & gardens is to preserve natural, tranquil woodlands for community enjoyment, to showcase native plants and a world class collection of rhododendrons and azaleas, and to promote environmental…

Environment
9
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
10
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
11
Chestnut Hill Conservancy

The Chestnut Hill Conservancy conserves, preserves, and celebrates history, architecture, and landscapes in Chestnut Hill and the lower Wissahickon watershed through inclusive and proactive community engagement, advocacy, and stewardship.

Arts & Culture
12
Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art

The Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art preserves and presents elements of art and nature that highlight the extraordinary beauty of the Brandywine region in Pennsylvania and Delaware. The Brandywine Conservancy protects and conserves…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education; the most unlike its peers is Longwood Gardens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
36/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $22,897 · OtherPA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMISS PORTERS-FARMINGTON FOUNDERS: $9,000 · OtherMISS PORTERS-FARMINGTON FOUNDERSCHOP FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · Other+54 more: $62,784 · Other+54 moreWayne Art Center: $21,400 · Arts & CultureWayne Art CenterWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $21,000 · Arts & CultureWOODMERE ART MUSEUMWILLOWS PARK PRESERVE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWILLOWS PARK PRESERVEInliquidcom Inc: $3,200 · Arts & CultureInliquidcom Inc+7 more: $3,820 · Arts & Culture+7 moreWillistown Conservation Trust Inc: $31,850 · EnvironmentWillistown Conservati…WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $5,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA …The Schuylkill Center For Environmental Education: $2,500 · EnvironmentThe Schuylkill Center…BARNSTABLE LAND TRUST INC: $2,250 · Environment+10 more: $4,965 · Environment+10 moreZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,500 · AnimalsXERCES SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · AnimalsMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · EducationThe Ivymount School Inc: $500 · EducationEpiscopal Academy: $400 · Education+2 more: $240 · EducationSPEAKUP: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MARION INSTITUTE INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropyLONGWOOD GARDENS INC: $185 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc: $4,000 · Science & Tech
Other$125,281Arts & Culture$54,420Environment$46,565Animals$8,500Education$6,140Philanthropy$4,785Science & Tech$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWillistown Conservation Trust Inc: $31,850 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWayne Art Center: $21,400 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $21,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLOWS PARK PRESERVE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInliquidcom Inc: $3,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSPEAKUP: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Schuylkill Center For Environmental Education: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARNSTABLE LAND TRUST INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWICH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MARION INSTITUTE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTZ PHILADELPHIA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRADNOR CONSERVANCY: $1,125 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEGROWN NATIONAL PARK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVOTEORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOld Dartmouth Historical Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE TWIN BROOKS INC: $900 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $810 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE COD MARITIME MUSEUMINC: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNatural Lands Trust Inc: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLADWYNE FIRE COMPANY: $610 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY BOATING CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERBEND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTISTIC NOISE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Ivymount School Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Academy: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $205 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONGWOOD GARDENS INC: $185 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $140 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHIPLEY SCHOOL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHYY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEAKED HILL TRUST INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORT LIGONIER ASSOCIATION: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Devereux Foundation: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Willistown Conservation Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wayne Art Center ↗
  • Who funds WOODMERE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLOWS PARK PRESERVE ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Inliquidcom Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPEAKUP ↗
  • Who funds ORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds The Schuylkill Center For Environmental Education ↗
  • Who funds BARNSTABLE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARION INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTZ PHILADELPHIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hamilton Family FoundationPA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hamilton Family Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Connelly Foundation · Penn Fruit Foundation Co Val Rossman · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Margaret Evans Tuten Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margaret Evans Tuten Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Barnstable Land Trust Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Old Dartmouth Historical Society: 2% of income from government
  • Vermont Studio Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Marion Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Community Boating Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Margaret Evans Tuten Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Margaret Evans Tuten Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Margaret Evans Tuten’s filings →

More from the funding graph