Skip to content
Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$325k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Philanthropy$131kCivil Rights$107kArts & Culture$104kCrime & Legal$101kHealth$80kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$23kReligion$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $250k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUPUYTREN RESEARCH GROUP$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$50,000
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$50,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$50,000
THE POSSIBILITY PROJECT$10,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$10,000
RYE FREE READING ROOM$5,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK$5,000
CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK$5,000
JERICHO PROJECT$5,000
CALVARY HOSPITAL$2,500
INTERNATIONAL FIBRODYSPLASIA OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA ASSOC$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
HOPE FOR UKRAINE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUCCESS: $10k → 7%CARVER CENTER: $2k → 9%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $5k → 7%CARVER CENTER: $2k → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $1k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $1k → 9%5 STEPS TO FIVE: $1k → 9%5 STEPS TO FIVE: $1k → 9%SPRYE: $1k → 9%SPRYE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MN
NY
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$432k · 23 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
19

Total granted

$432k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

74%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DR
    Dupuytren Research Group Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $64k · revenue +31%
  • PC
    PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +61%
  • FW
    FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • N
    NYCB
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY CHURCH INWOOD
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Road Runners Inc

As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.

—
2
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world

Philanthropy
3
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The Partnership for New York City Inc

(a) the development, stimulation, encouragement, improvement and promotion of the business climate in new york city; (b) the fostering of trade and commerce in new york city and the promotion of the general welfare andprosperity of new…

—
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
9
Westchester Jewish Community Services Inc

Westchester jewish community services (wjcs) is a non-sectarian, not for profit, broad based human service agency dedicated to helping people of all ages cope with emotional, cognitive, environmental, physical, social, and educational…

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is IMPACT100 Westchester Inc; the most unlike its peers is Inclusive Ski Touring. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
18/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $100,000 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERANYCB: $50,000 · OtherNYCBIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLY TRINITY CHURCH INWOOD: $20,000 · OtherHOLY TRINITY CHURCH INWOODIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+31 more: $57,082 · Other+31 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $100,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE+1 more: $5,000 · Civil RightsDupuytren Research Group Inc: $63,500 · HealthDupuytren Re…CALVARY HOSPITAL INC: $2,500 · Health+4 more: $5,000 · Health+4 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPebble Beach Company Foundation: $2,500 · PhilanthropyIMPACT100 WESTCHESTER INC: $2,150 · PhilanthropyMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND: $10,000 · Human ServicesPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $5,000 · Human ServicesSPRYE INC: $2,000 · Human Services5 Steps to Five: $2,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalJERICHO PROJECT: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$287,082Civil Rights$205,000Health$71,000Philanthropy$27,150Human Services$25,000Crime & Legal$20,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDupuytren Research Group Inc: $63,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetTHE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRYE FREE READING ROOM: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJERICHO PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPebble Beach Company Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT100 WESTCHESTER INC: $2,150 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DANNY BUTLER MEMORIAL FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARITAS OF PORT CHESTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT WASHINGTON OBSERVATORY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInclusive Ski Touring: $2,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetSPRYE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDANIEL'S MUSIC FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget5 Steps to Five: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE FOR UKRAINE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RYE ARTS CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF RYE TOWN PARK INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SHARING SHELF INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF RYE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NEW ROCHELLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUL RYEDERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAVON LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTERGAR INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION: $230 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Glickenhaus Found…The Joe & Sandy Sambe…The Dunn Family Found…The New York Communit…Mile 20 Foundation IncSalice Family Foundat…Belmay Family Foundat…Nicholas & Christina …John and Jennifer Eck…The Bernard & Muriel …The Tiger Tail Family…Jewish Communal Fund
The Glickenhaus FoundationNY34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Glickenhaus Foundation · The Joe & Sandy Samberg Foundation Inc · The Dunn Family Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Mile 20 Foundation Inc · Salice Family Foundation · Belmay Family Foundation Inc · Nicholas & Christina Raho Foundationinc · John and Jennifer Eckerson Family Foundation C/O Citrin Cooperman · The Bernard & Muriel Lauren Foundation · The Tiger Tail Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home