· Private foundation
Margaret & Peter Philips Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BELIEVE IN A CURE | $25,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MEDICAL FUND | $25,000 |
| EPIC LONG ISLAND | $10,000 |
| ADVENTURELAND HELPING HANDS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BABYLON BREAST CANCER COALITION | $10,000 |
| STRIDES4STEVEN | $3,500 |
| PLESSERS CHARITY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| PLEBEIANHELPERS INC | $2,500 |
| GREGG'S GIFT | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SISTREETSQUASH INC2× · 2022–2024 · $91k · revenue +43%
- AHADVENTURELAND'S HELPING HANDS FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +99%
- S4STRIDES 4 STEVEN INC2× · 2024–2025 · $9k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- SJST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITALone grant, 2024 · $20k
- SJSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +39%
- AUALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Nycco is organized to conduct, have published, and distribute research, studies, and analysis relating to ibd. to that end, nycco seeks to enhance the level of care for patients in the new york metropolitan area suffering from ibd, through…
The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…
The mission of the james krystalla foundation inc (the foundation) is to support organizations that conduct research for the prevention, treatment, and cure of illnesses, diseases, and cancer affecting children.
The organization was formed to raise monies to donate to the feinstein institute for medical research.
To raise funds and public awareness about cutting-edge targeted cancer treatments for childhood cancer so that someday very soon the treatment of childhood cancer will be gentler and more tolerable for children and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Als United Greater New York Inc and the most unlike its peers is Streetsquash Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
- Who funds EPIC LONG ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BELIEVE IN A CURE INC ↗
- Who funds ADVENTURELAND'S HELPING HANDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds BABYLON BREAST CANCER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds STRIDES 4 STEVEN INC ↗
- Who funds PLESSER'S CHARITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLEBEIANHELPERS INC ↗
- Who funds GREGG'S GIFT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Margaret & Peter Philips Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Margaret & Peter Philips Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Margaret & Peter Philips Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.