· Private foundation
Margaret a Lindberg Fdn Inc Mng Agy
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $116k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $165k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $115,000 |
| OAKWOOD FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| PLATTE RIVER WHOOPING CRANE MAINTENANCE | $36,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $20,000 |
| SACRAMENTO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF DANE COUNTY | $10,000 |
| WILLA BROWN AVIATION ACADEMY | $8,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN WI | $5,000 |
| OVERTURE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY | $5,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY | $3,000 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OFOAKWOOD FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +79%
INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +19%- SHSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- OFOAKWOOD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $100k
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2023 · $10k
- TNTHE NEBRASKA LAND TRUST INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +128%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.
The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.
The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…
To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.
Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sacramento Zoological Society and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Dane County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OAKWOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLATTE RIVER WHOOPING CRANE MAINTENANCE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEBRASKA LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Margaret a Lindberg Fdn Inc Mng Agy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Margaret a Lindberg Fdn Inc Mng Agy?
Find your warmest path to Margaret a Lindberg Fdn Inc Mng Agy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.