Skip to content
Marcus Corporation Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Marcus Corporation Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$149k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$3.3MPhilanthropy$963kEducation$846kCommunity Improvement$210kYouth Development$107kHealth$77kAnimals$60kHuman Services$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARNARD COLLEGE$50,000
MARCUS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC$20,000
MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC$20,000
MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC$10,100
MILWAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC$10,000
DONALD DRIVER FOUNDATION$10,000
MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC$5,000
VINCE LOMBARDI CANCER FOUNDATION INC$5,000
FELLOWSHIP OPEN INC$2,500
MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC$1,800
MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC$1,500
CHILDRENS OUTING ASSN$1,000
VERNON AREA REHABILITATION CENTER INC$1,000
BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1k → 14%EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $100 → 10%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC: $1k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $8k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $4k → 17%AFAR INC: $500 → 17%SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
IA
CA
NE
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 30 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
54

Total granted

$4.6M
$377k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+23%

Still filing today

93%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MARCUS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +14%
  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $505k · revenue +37%
  • THE UWM FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • MILWAUKEE DOWNTOWN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +6%
  • JA
    JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $65k · revenue +53%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
2
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
3
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

Improve metro milwaukee as a place to create jobs, invest capital and grow business.

—
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—
6
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
7
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
8
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
9
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
10
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
11
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
12
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mpc Endowment Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/85
Grantees still filing
54/85
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARCUS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,290,000 · Arts & CultureMARCUS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INCMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,260,750 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $212,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INCMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $127,500 · Arts & Culture+16 more: $347,236 · Arts & Culture+16 moreENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $500,000 · PhilanthropyENTERTAINMENT INDUS…UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $450,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREAT…+7 more: $25,650 · PhilanthropyTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $505,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLL…THE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDATI…BARNARD COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGE+9 more: $35,650 · EducationGreater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development: $39,700 · OtherMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $20,500 · OtherACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATOIN: $20,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S & WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherWISCONSIN RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE JAZZ INSITITUTE INC: $10,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · OtherRush University Medical Center: $20,000 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $16,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $10,000 · OtherACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Other+40 more: $57,700 · OtherMILWAUKEE DOWNTOWN INC: $150,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $500 · Community ImprovementBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $101,000 · Youth DevelopmentZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTY: $60,000 · Animals+1 more: $200 · Animals
Arts & Culture$3,237,486Philanthropy$975,650Education$840,650Other$258,900Community Improvement$150,500Youth Development$101,000Animals$60,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARCUS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,290,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,260,750 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $505,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $450,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $212,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMILWAUKEE DOWNTOWN INC: $150,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $127,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $101,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $100,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $65,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTY: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETTY BRINN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGreater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development: $39,700 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC: $26,850 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE JAZZ INSTITUTE INC: $16,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $14,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $11,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBrewers Community Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMarquette University: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $6,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVince Lombardi Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANN'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCREATE WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF WISCONSIN INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRADIO MILWAUKEE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEMPO Milwaukee Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetGREAT LAKES HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OPEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMilwaukee Press Club: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOPERATION DREAM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetABCD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES HONOR FLIGHT INC: $2,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Fou…Herbert H Kohl Charit…United Way of Greater…Ralph Evinrude Founda…Anon Charitable TrustEvan & Marion Helfaer…Green Bay Packers Fou…Baird Foundation IncWaukesha County Commu…Joseph and Vera Zilbe…Peck Foundation Milwa…Richard and Ethel Her…
Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI64.7× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd · Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marcus Corporation Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marcus Corporation Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marcus Corporation Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Marcus Corporation Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marcus’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home