Skip to content
Maqsood a Malik and Abida M Malik Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Maqsood a Malik and Abida M Malik Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$32kHuman Services$8kInternational$8kPhilanthropy$1kEducation$1kReligion$950Public Safety & Disaster$700
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$200
Median grant
10
States reached
$268k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMRAN CANCER APPEAL INC$10,000
SAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATION$3,000
FRIENDS OF ERWO$500
AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY HORN OF N AF$500
ZAYTUNA COLLEGE$250
FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC$200
SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC$200
CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE$200
HIDAYA FOUNDATION$200
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$200
UNITED MISSION FOR RELIEF DVLP$200
ISLAMIC SEMINARY FOUNDATION INC$200
UMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL$200
HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF DVLP INC$200
ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSN OF N AMERICA I$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY HORN OF N AF: $500 → 7%CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: $300 → 10%HIDAYA FOUNDATION: $300 → 8%ZAYTUNA COLLEGE: $500 → 10%SAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $300 → 6%MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $250 → 17%FRIENDS OF ERWO: $1k → 5%ISLAMIC SEMINARY FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 14%SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $300 → 16%UNITED MISSION FOR RELIEF DVLP: $300 → 14%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF DVLP INC: $300 → 8%IMRAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $10k → 11%ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSN OF N AMERICA I: $300 → 7%UMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $300 → 8%THE HUMAN DVLP FOUNDATION OF N AMER: $300 → 14%ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $300 → 9%AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY HORN OF N AF: $300 → 7%CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: $200 → 10%HIDAYA FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%ZAYTUNA COLLEGE: $500 → 10%SAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $100 → 6%MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 → 17%FRIENDS OF ERWO: $500 → 5%ISLAMIC SEMINARY FOUNDATION INC: $250 → 14%SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $250 → 16%UNITED MISSION FOR RELIEF DVLP: $250 → 14%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF DVLP INC: $250 → 8%IMRAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $10k → 11%ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSN OF N AMERICA I: $200 → 7%UMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $250 → 8%THE HUMAN DVLP FOUNDATION OF N AMER: $250 → 14%ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $100 → 9%HIDAYA FOUNDATION: $200 → 8%ZAYTUNA COLLEGE: $250 → 10%SAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $200 → 14%FRIENDS OF ERWO: $500 → 5%ISLAMIC SEMINARY FOUNDATION INC: $200 → 14%SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $200 → 16%UNITED MISSION FOR RELIEF DVLP: $200 → 14%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF DVLP INC: $200 → 8%IMRAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $10k → 11%ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSN OF N AMERICA I: $200 → 7%UMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $200 → 8%THE HUMAN DVLP FOUNDATION OF N AMER: $200 → 14%ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $300 → 14%ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 19 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
0

Total granted

$52k
$0

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalHealthPublic Safety & DisasterReligionEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IK
    IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +15%
  • ZC
    Zaytuna College Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +7%
  • TI
    THE ISLAMIC SEMINARY OF AMERICA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $950 · revenue +6%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
    Education
    2
    International Institute of Islamic Medicine

    International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application

    Human Services
    3
    Imamia Medics International Inc

    Medical research & community awareness. medical relief project in under- served regions. physician education & training.

    Philanthropy
    4
    Zakah Aid and Charity Assisting Humanity

    Zakat, aid and charity assisting humanity (zacah) is a minnesota-based grassroots organization dedicated to the collection and re-distribution of wealth, including zakat (mandatory charitable tax for all muslims) and sadaqah (any…

    Religion
    5
    Indo American Development and Health Organization
    International
    6
    Irusa Waqf

    Establish a pool of capital that ensures the long-term sustainability of irusa and enables the charity in achieving its objectives.

    International
    7
    Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
    Education
    8
    Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

    Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

    Human Services
    9
    Indo-Us Foundation

    The foundation provides medical grants and educational assistance to needy groups and organizations.

    Human Services
    10
    United Humanitarian Foundation

    To provide humanitarian relief and programs to help, assist, and empower citizens in their communities for sustainability and human development.

    Human Services
    11
    Zafar and Atia Incorporated

    The organization is working for raising funds for Koohi Goth Women Hospital, Malir University of Science and Technology, and related projects in Koohi Goth near Landhi Karachi. Pakistan.

    International
    12
    Hikmah Relief

    Hikmah relief is a non-profit corporation and operates exclusively for educational, humanitarian, and charitable purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)3 of the internal revenue code, or the corresponding section of any future…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Icna Relief Usa Programs Inc; the most unlike its peers is Siut North America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    12/12
    Grantees still filing
    9/12
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $30,000 · OtherIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INCSAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $8,200 · OtherSAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF ERWO: $2,000 · Other+6 more: $4,000 · Other+6 moreFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $950 · HealthSIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $750 · HealthUMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $750 · InternationalCENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: $500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $450 · InternationalZaytuna College Inc: $1,250 · ReligionISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $700 · Public Safety & DisasterICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $400 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE ISLAMIC SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $950 · EducationHIDAYA FOUNDATION: $750 · Philanthropy
    Other$44,200Health$1,700International$1,700Religion$1,250Public Safety & Disaster$1,100Education$950Philanthropy$750

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetZaytuna College Inc: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISLAMIC SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIDAYA FOUNDATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Rauf & Azeem Foundati…Imami Family Foundati…Zakia and Mian Family…Darul Sadaqa786The Pfizer Foundation…Good Planet FoundationShell USA Company Fou…American Muslim Commu…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Baker Hughes Foundati…Bright Funds Foundati…Verizon Foundation
    Rauf & Azeem Foundation IncTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Rauf & Azeem Foundation Inc · Imami Family Foundation Inc · Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Darul Sadaqa786 · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Good Planet Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Verizon Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Maqsood a Malik and Abida M Malik Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maqsood a Malik and Abida M Malik Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      2get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Maqsood a Malik and Abida M Malik’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home