· Private foundation
Imami Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k34 grants · $76k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HIDAYA FOUNDATION | $22,800 |
| LIFE FOR RELIEF DEVELOPEMENT | $9,064 |
| ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $7,000 |
| ISLAMIC RELIEF USA | $5,676 |
| THE CITIZEN FOUNDATION USA | $5,000 |
| UNITY PRODUCTION FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| HELPING HANDS FOR RELIEF DEVELOPMEN | $4,350 |
| MERCY-USA FOR AID DEVELOPMENT | $4,020 |
| DARUL-ULOOM AL-MADANIA | $4,000 |
| HUMAN DEV FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| SUNTREE VIERA ISLAMIC CENTER | $4,000 |
| ISLAMIC COMM OF SW FLORIDA | $3,000 |
| HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SW FL | $3,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
41 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHIDAYA FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $77k · revenue +14%
- TZTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA4× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +67%
- IRISLAMIC RELIEF USA5× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- IKIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +109%
- BEBILQUIS EDHI RELIEF FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -31%
- KKEMCAANAone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.
To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.
The mission of habib alrahman charity foundation (hacf) is to establish a kideny center in sudan called hacf kidney center, which will help patients with kidney (renal)problems in sudan. kidney problems are very common in sudan and the…
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Imana fosters health promotion, disease prevention, and health maintenance in communities around the world through direct patient care, health programs, and advocacy.
The aga khan foundation u.s.a. is a public, non-denominational, philanthropic organization established by his highness the aga khan. it seeks to promote social development, primarily in low income countries of asia & africa by funding…
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy-Usa for Aid & Developmentinc and the most unlike its peers is Bilquis Edhi Relief Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HIDAYA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds MERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC ↗
- Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds BILQUIS EDHI RELIEF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds UMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Barnabas Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE ALLIANCE FOR A SAFE & DRUG FREE COMMUNITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mufiz & Zain Chauhan Foundation · The Tabbaa Foundation · Maqsood a Malik and Abida M Malik Charitable Trust · Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Bright Funds Foundation · Abdul Satar & Family Foundation · The Al-Ameen Foundation · Nakadar Foundation · The Fountain of Knowledg Foundation · Darul Sadaqa786 · American Muslim Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Imami Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.