Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maon Noam Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0169% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$192kPhilanthropy$157kFood & Nutrition$86kEducation$31kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$7kInternational$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
$280
Median grant
5
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Various Receipients$44,757
Tag Academy$6,500
Congregation Monsey Beis Chaya Mush$5,432
Congregation Tzemach Tzedek Monsey$3,720
Individual grant recipient$2,150
Individual grant recipient$1,380
Bikur Cholin of Crown Heights$1,280
Cheder Chabad of Monsey$1,215
OJC Fund$1,050
Zaka Tel-Aviv$406
Individual grant recipient$360
Gofund me$339
Committee for the Strengthening$280
Chabad Greenfield$280
Colel Chabad$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHTS: $6k → 20%Bikur Cholim of Crown Heights: $2k → 20%Bikur Cholin of Crown Heights: $1k → 20%BIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHT: $180 → 20%KEREN SIMCHOS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $100 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MD
KS
TN
SC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$285k · 68 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

68 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
185

Total granted

$285k
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+21%

Still filing today

19%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionPhilanthropyInternationalEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHTS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +113%
  • CC
    CHEDER CHABAD OF MONSEY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +127%
  • CG
    CHARIDY GLOBAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • CL
    Chabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center
    one grant, 2023 · $21k
  • CN
    CHABAD NESHAMA CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • LT
    LEARNING TREE
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of Tzeirei Chabad in Israel Inc

To pursue a greater outreach of knowledge of the Jewish Torah and to further educate the less knowledgeable

Religion
2
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
3
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
4
Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc

Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and charitable needs of the Jewish Community.

—
5
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
6
Chayenu Inc

The organization publishes a weekly magazine which includes the weekly study portions of Chumash, Tanya, Rambam, Moshiach, and Halacha. The weekly publication is distributed around the world.

Religion
7
Chasudim Foundation
—
8
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
9
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
10
Chevrah Lomdei Mishnah Inc

Promoting study of Mishnah and other Jewish texts

Religion
11
Chabad of Columbia University

To educate jewish students based on chabad chassidic philosophy, advance their understanding of jewish ideas and foster their jewishness.

—
12
Chabad of Medellin Columbia Inc

Chabad of Medellin Columbia Inc is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and charitable needs of the Jewish Community.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Core Outreach Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Charity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 260 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Various Receipients: $86,298 · OtherVarious ReceipientsCONGREGATION TZEMACH TZEDEK: $51,399 · OtherCONGREGATION TZEMACH TZEDEKChabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center: $21,180 · OtherChabad Lubavitch Hospitality CenterVARIOUS RECIPIENTS: $12,220 · Other+178 more: $194,694 · Other+178 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $139,500 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITA…Tag Academy Inc: $16,500 · EducationCHEDER CHABAD OF MONSEY: $7,245 · EducationMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,588 · EducationTHE OJC FUND: $2,100 · EducationBIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHTS: $8,990 · Human ServicesGOFUNDMEORG: $1,803 · PhilanthropyCANDID: $1,517 · PhilanthropyZaka Tel-Aviv Inc: $458 · PhilanthropyFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $280 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC: $860 · ReligionMACHON CHANA WOMENS INSTITUTE: $432 · ReligionLikras Shabbos Inc: $180 · ReligionFRIENDS OF OR CHAYA INC: $180 · ReligionCHABAD OF FLUSHING INC: $180 · ReligionALEPH SOCIETY INC: $564 · InternationalChabad Terror Victims Project Inc: $306 · InternationalFRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI: $186 · International
Other$365,791Community Improvement$139,500Education$31,433Human Services$8,990Philanthropy$4,058Religion$1,832International$1,056

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $139,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTag Academy Inc: $16,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHTS: $8,990 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCHEDER CHABAD OF MONSEY: $7,245 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHARIDY GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $5,900 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,588 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE OJC FUND: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $1,803 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANDID: $1,517 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC: $860 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEPH SOCIETY INC: $564 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY INC: $460 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZaka Tel-Aviv Inc: $458 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACHON CHANA WOMENS INSTITUTE: $432 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Avner Institute Inc: $316 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChabad Terror Victims Project Inc: $306 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECHO NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH: $280 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI: $186 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLikras Shabbos Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF OR CHAYA INC: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Tag Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds CHEDER CHABAD OF MONSEY ↗
  • Who funds CHARIDY GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY35.5× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Maimon and Ruth Kirschenbaum Foundation Inc · Fjc · Bracha Vehatzlacha Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Crain-Maling Foundation · Congregation Bh Inc · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maon Noam Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maon Noam Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 260 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maon Noam’s filings →

    More from the funding graph