Skip to content

· Private foundation

Manzana Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$585k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$12MPhilanthropy$1.7MHuman Services$319kFood & Nutrition$124kHealth$500
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $240k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$4,323
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HERITAGE UNIVERSITY$250,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE$240,000
Individual grant recipient$27,861
Individual grant recipient$19,369
Individual grant recipient$10,251
Individual grant recipient$7,884
Individual grant recipient$6,587
WASHINGTON APPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,300
Individual grant recipient$4,337
Individual grant recipient$4,323
Individual grant recipient$2,621
TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,565
Individual grant recipient$951
Individual grant recipient$910
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LA CASA HOGAR: $250k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.1M · 42 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
21

Total granted

$9.1M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+15%

Still filing today

10%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HU
    HERITAGE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +82%
  • RS
    ROYAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
    2× · 2021–2023 · $2.7M
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.2M

Funded once

  • ES
    EDUCATIONAL SERVICE DISTRICT 105
    one grant, 2021 · $3.1M
  • LC
    LA CASA HOGAR
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +2%
  • ID
    INSPIRE DEVELOPMENT CENTERSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $69k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
2
Alameda Education Foundation

AEF serves as a critical bridge toward equitable and inclusive educational outcomes for Alameda TK-12 public school students.

—
3
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
4
Lev Foundation

LEV Foundation acts to serve the interests of students and families across the State of Washington to improve education access and quality. Particularly those who have been harmed by historical and systemic inequities.

Civil Rights
5
Hispanic Access Foundation

Hispanic access foundation connects latinos and others to partners and opportunities to improve lives and create an equitable society.

Human Services
6
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
7
Alliant Educational Foundation

The alliant educational foundation builds bridges between under-resourced communities, universities, and other organizations to create a more equitable, healthy, and just society.

Education
8
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
9
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
10
Teach Access

Bringing together industry, education, and disability advocacy organizations, Teach Access addresses the digital accessibility skills gap by equipping learners to build toward an inclusive world.

Youth Development
11
Veap Inc

VEAP is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, multi-service, human service organization with the mission of "Together, we create pathways to stronger, more hopeful, communities through access to healthy food, housing stability and supportive services."

—
12
Technology Association of Oregon

To support our members and promote the growth and quality of oregon's technology industry by providing opportunities for business and professional development through networking and informational programs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspire Development Centers; the most unlike its peers is Wellness House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDUCATIONAL SERVICE DISTRICT 105: $3,119,545 · OtherEDUCATIONAL SERVICE DISTRICT 105ROYAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2,681,817 · OtherROYAL SCHOOL DISTRICTCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE: $2,179,740 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE+64 more: $750,435 · Other+64 moreHERITAGE UNIVERSITY: $3,210,862 · EducationHERITAGE UNIVERSITYTeach for America Inc: $250,000 · EducationTeach for America IncVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $1,743,628 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARI…WASHINGTON APPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $123,550 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON APP…LA CASA HOGAR: $250,000 · Human ServicesTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $2,700 · Community Improvement
Other$8,731,537Education$3,460,862Philanthropy$1,867,178Human Services$250,000Community Improvement$2,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHERITAGE UNIVERSITY: $3,210,862 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetLA CASA HOGAR: $250,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $250,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON APPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $123,550 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetINSPIRE DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $69,369 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWellness House: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HERITAGE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds LA CASA HOGAR ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON APPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRE DEVELOPMENT CENTERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yakima Valley Community FoundationWA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yakima Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Manzana Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Manzana Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Manzana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph