Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mann Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$850k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.9MReligion$211kArts & Culture$83kHealth$63kHuman Services$43kPhilanthropy$36kRecreation & Sports$22kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $84k
  • $250k+1 grant · $750k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$750,000
WINGATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
MADELYNS FUND$24,000
RAVENSCROFT SCHOOL$15,000
DIAPER TRAIN$10,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$10,000
BAND TOGETHER NC$7,500
NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$6,500
WOMEN'S GIVING NETWORK OF WAKE COUNTY$1,200
CARETHE JOHN 316 CENTER$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TABLE: $5k → 13%DIAPER TRAIN: $10k → 8%DIAPER TRAIN: $10k → 8%DIAPER TRAIN: $9k → 8%STEP UP MINISTRY: $1k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $2k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 16 repeat orgs$792k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$1.6M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-3%

Still filing today

63%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2024 · $793k · revenue +97%
  • RAVENSCROFT SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue +46%
  • WU
    WINGATE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $62k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -22%
  • TABLE MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +35%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER TRIANGLE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wake County Smart Start Inc

Wake county smart start invests in young children, their families, and a connected early childhood system that supports and prepares them for school and life ahead.

Education
2
North Carolina Business Leaders for Educ

The mission of north carolina business leaders for education (dba best nc) is to unite an engaged and informed business perspective to dramatically transform and improve north carolina's education system. our goal is for every student to…

Education
3
Early Years Inc

Early years leads efforts to strengthen accessible and affordable quality early care and education by providing support for families, communities and the workforce. early years 's primary purpose is to provide services, research and…

4
Foundation of the University of North Carolina At Charlotte

The foundation of unc charlotte receives contributions to promote and develop the academic and educational purpose of unc charlotte by providing support for operations, educational programs, and scholarships for the university and its…

5
Research Triangle Regional Partnership

The research triangle regional partnership is an association of area economic development agencies dedicated to keeping the research triangle region economically strong by collectively marketing the region's competitive advantages and…

6
North Carolina Foundation for Public School Children

To provide basic necessities for public school children as well as improving parenting skills in order for the children to be successful in school and to expand professional development opportunities for educators.

Philanthropy
7
Queens University of Charlotte

Queens university of charlotte provides transformative educational experiences that nurture intellectual curiosity, promote global understanding, encourage ethical living and prepare individuals for purposeful and fulfilling lives.

Education
8
Triangle Charter Education Association Inc

The triangle charter educational association is a north carolina not-for-profit entity organized exclusively for educational purposes. the association is comprised of respected leaders within the state of north carolina who are committed…

Education
9
Ncinnovation Inc

The organization is a public-private partnership to accelerate and scale commercialized innovation from nc's universities, create jobs, and improve economic opportunities in all 100 counties of north carolina.

Education
10
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
11
Charlotte Country Day School

Through excellence in education, charlotte country day school develops the potential of each student by fostering intellectual curiosity, principled character, ethical leadership and a responsibility to serve. the key values and…

Education
12
South Carolina Childrens Fund

To make strategic, catalytic investments and provide expertise and technical assistance to educational organizations across south carolina.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Educational Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Jim Parke Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%5%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr14%30%20–35yr12%10%35–55yr9%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%2%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr14%3%20–35yr12%1%35–55yr9%93%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
14%
1,073/7,420

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $750,000 · EducationWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONRAVENSCROFT SCHOOL — $265,000 · EducationRAVENSCROFT SCHOOLWINGATE UNIVERSITY — $62,000 · EducationWINGATE UNIVERSITY+3 more — $18,000 · EducationTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $793,000 · OtherTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCALLIANCE MINISTRIES — $111,000 · OtherALLIANCE MINISTRIESHAYES BARTON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $59,000 · OtherHAYES BARTON UNITED METHODIST CHURCHNC HALL OF FAME INC — $57,500 · OtherHAYES BARTON BAPTIST CHURCH — $41,000 · Other+6 more — $42,800 · OtherMadelyns Fund — $48,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 · HealthDIAPER TRAIN — $29,100 · Human ServicesTABLE MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $2,500 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesBAND TOGETHER — $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $19,900 · PhilanthropyTHE JIM PARKE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentOVERFLOWING HANDS INC BELARUSSIAN OUTREACH — $1,750 · Youth Development
Education$1,095,000Other$1,104,300Health$53,000Human Services$37,600Public Safety & Disaster$25,000Philanthropy$24,900Youth Development$23,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $793,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $750,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetRAVENSCROFT SCHOOL — $265,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWINGATE UNIVERSITY — $62,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMadelyns Fund — $48,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetDIAPER TRAIN — $29,100 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetBAND TOGETHER — $25,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $19,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $12,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetC A R E dba The John 3 16 Center — $10,300 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE SOUTHEAST RALEIGH CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTABLE MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JIM PARKE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPEL HILL DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAFECHILD — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOVERFLOWING HANDS INC BELARUSSIAN OUTREACH — $1,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPUP MINISTRY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEE CARE CHILDREN'S ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC27.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · A E Finley Foundation Inc · Bell Koonce Burnette Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Replogle Family Foundation · Bell Schaefer Family Foundation · Bell Cook Family Foundation · John William Pope Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Raleigh Kiwanis Foundation Inc · Maynard Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mann Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph