· Private foundation
Mangione Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k53 grants · $73k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Archdiocese of Baltimore | $50,000 |
| Loyola Blakefield | $30,000 |
| Loyola University Maryland | $25,000 |
| Notre Dame of Maryland University | $25,000 |
| Calvert Hall College | $20,000 |
| Gilchrist Hospice Care | $15,000 |
| Stevenson University | $15,000 |
| St Mary's Parish | $10,000 |
| Loyola College Scholarship Fund | $10,000 |
| Blossoms of Hope | $8,450 |
| St Francis Xavier | $5,600 |
| O'Dwyer Retreat House | $5,000 |
| Women's Educational Alliance | $5,000 |
| JCC of Greater Baltimore | $5,000 |
| Church of the Nativity | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
71 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GHGILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $156k · revenue +64%
- LULoyola University Maryland Inc2× · 2018–2024 · $75k · revenue +20%
- SUSTEVENSON UNIVERSITY5× · 2018–2024 · $73k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- YMYoung Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Incgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +32%
- HCHoward County Community Collegeone grant, 2021 · $5k
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The organization's mission is to solicit and receive contributions and grants from the general public and to hold, invest, and administer these funds and pay expenditures for the benefit of the university of maryland in baltimore and to…
The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gbmc Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Loyola University Maryland Inc ↗
- Who funds STEVENSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BLOSSOMS OF HOPE THE HOWARD COUNTY CHER ↗
- Who funds WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF HOWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE AREA COUNCIL #220 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP HOWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Stella Maris Inc ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Kahlert Foundation Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Edward St John Foundation Inc · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · Batza Family Foundation Inc · Middendorf Foundation Inc · Dr Frank C Marino Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mangione Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Autism Society of Maryland Inc — 67% of income from government
- The Maryland School for the Blind — 47% of income from government
- Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — 22% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Notre Dame of Maryland University Inc — 9% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Industry Inc — 7% of income from government
- Chesapeake Arts Center Inc — 7% of income from government
- Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
- Stevenson University — 6% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
- Jewish Community Center of Baltimore Inc — 2% of income from government
- Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mercy Medical Center — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.