Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mangen Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
8
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$112kReligion$77kHealth$73kHuman Services$73kFood & Nutrition$27kInternational$18kEducation$16kOther$0
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k13 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$780k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH SHALOM$12,000
HORSE OF CT INC$8,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$4,000
FOOTHILLS FOOD BANK$4,000
FOOTHILLS ANIMAL RESCUE$4,000
YAKIMA VALLEY PET RESCUE$3,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$3,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,000
HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$3,000
TRIPLE R HORSE RESCUE$3,000
WILD AT HEART$3,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION$3,000
AZ ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VETERANS YOGA PROJECT: $3k → 10%VETERANS YOGA PROJECT: $3k → 10%VETERANS YOGA PROJECT: $3k → 10%VETERANS YOGA PROJECT: $3k → 10%VETERANS YOGA PROJECT: $3k → 10%VETERANS YOGA PROJECT: $3k → 10%VETERANS YOGA PROJECT: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CT
CA
MD
AZ
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$461k · 16 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$461k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+184%

Still filing today

69%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthAnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Global
    8× · 2019–2026 · $36k · revenue +82%
  • Foothills Food Bank
    8× · 2019–2026 · $31k · revenue +103%
  • FA
    FOOTHILLS ANIMAL RESCUE
    8× · 2019–2026 · $30k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +29%
  • AN
    ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +184%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
2
Foothill Dog Rescue of the Sierras

Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…

Animals
3
Peace River Refuge & Ranch Inc

Forest Animal Rescue protects wildlife by preserving natural habitats for the safe release of rehabilitated animals and the rehabilitation and release of black bears.

Animals
4
On Golden Rescue

The mission of ogr is to ensure that urgent need and at-risk horses and other large animals are removed from danger, rehabilitated, and provided a permanent home so that they may live out the natural span of their lives in a safe and…

Animals
5
Animal Rescue Project

Animal rescue project saves homeless pets, one at a time, and offers socially responsible adoption services to those seeking the companionship of pets. by providing medical care to homeless pets, providing temporary shelter to them, and…

Animals
6
Rheumatology Research Foundation

The mission of the rheumatology research foundation is to advance research and training to improve the health of people with rheumatic diseases.

Health
7
Romania Animal Rescue Inc

Organization mission is to establish animal welfare through spay/neuter, veterinary care and treatments for rescuers and impoverished owners' animals, funding training for veterinarians to learn better surgical skills, provide food and…

Youth Development
8
American College of Radiology Foundation

The mission of the acr foundation is to advance the profession and practice of radiology to benefit patients with a specific emphasis on health policy research.

Philanthropy
9
Animal Cancer Foundation

Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…

Health
10
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
11
Foundation for Cardiovascular Research and Innovations
Philanthropy
12
Hippocratic Cancer Research Foundation Inc

Accelerate and increase impact of scientific discoveries within cancer biology and oncology.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yakima Valley Pet Rescue and Adoption Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HORSE OF CT INC: $58,500 · OtherHORSE OF CT INCTEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $55,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOMMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $38,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERTEMPLE BETH SHALOM (RABBI BENJAMIN SCOLNIC DISCRETIONARY FUND): $34,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOM (RABBI BENJAMIN SCOLNIC DISCRETIONARY FUND)Foothills Food Bank: $31,000 · OtherFoothills Food BankFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCWILD AT HEART: $14,500 · OtherWILD AT HEART+1 more: $3,000 · OtherRonald McDonald House Global: $36,000 · HealthRonald McDonald Ho…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S…CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS …+1 more: $2,000 · HealthFOOTHILLS ANIMAL RESCUE: $30,000 · AnimalsFOOTHILLS ANIMAL R…Yakima Valley Pet Rescue and Adoption Center: $24,000 · AnimalsYakima Valley Pet …TRIPLE R HORSE RESCUE OF ARIZONA: $18,000 · AnimalsTRIPLE R HORSE RES…WILD AT HEART INC: $3,000 · AnimalsHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $21,000 · InternationalSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $19,000 · EducationVETERANS YOGA PROJECT INC: $18,500 · Human ServicesTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$259,000Health$76,500Animals$75,000International$21,000Education$19,000Human Services$18,500Public Safety & Disaster$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $36,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFoothills Food Bank: $31,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOOTHILLS ANIMAL RESCUE: $30,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYakima Valley Pet Rescue and Adoption Center: $24,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS YOGA PROJECT INC: $18,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTRIPLE R HORSE RESCUE OF ARIZONA: $18,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Yakima Valley Pet Rescue and Adoption Center ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS YOGA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIPLE R HORSE RESCUE OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD AT HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express FoundationNY13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mangen Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mangen Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mangen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph