Skip to content

· Private foundation

Manchester Road Race Committee Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$42kEducation$42kHousing & Shelter$30kHuman Services$27kCrime & Legal$25kArts & Culture$22kYouth Development$22kRecreation & Sports$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $64k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$524k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Manchester High School$21,500
Lutz Children Museum$12,000
Manchester Police Activity League Inc$10,000
Rebuilding Together of Manchester$10,000
Manchester Adult and Continuing Education$10,000
Manchester Community Emergency Response Team$6,000
MARC Inc$5,300
Muscular Dystrophy Association$5,000
MHS Boys & Girls Outdoor Track & Field$5,000
The Manchester Sculpture Project$5,000
Gentle Love Diaper Pantry Inc$3,000
MRC Track & Field Services$2,350
Girls on the Run Southeastern Connecticut$1,500
TLC Foundation$1,500
Case Mountain Cabin Inc$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 9 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$157k
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+16%

Still filing today

22%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER OF MANCHESTER CT
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +51%
  • MP
    Manchester Police Activity League
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k
  • MD
    Muscular Dystrophy Association
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k

Funded once

  • MA
    MANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +16%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue +17%
  • DH
    Diyeso-Lewis House of TLC Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocates of Connecticut Inc

Child Advocates of Connecticut (CAC) transforms the lives of vulnerable children and youth by providing trained and supervised one-on-one volunteer advocates in the community, classroom and courtroom.

—
2
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
3
Mental Health Connecticut Inc

Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.

Health
4
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
5
Eastern Connecticut Housing Opportunities Inc

Eastern connecticut housing opportunities, inc. is a non-profit organization organized to provide affordable housing to low-income families of southeastern connecticut.

Housing & Shelter
6
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
7
Children's Public Health Fund

The organization is dedicated to improving the health and well being of children from low income families in the greater manchester area. the organization is organized and operated exclusively support the child and health and welfare…

Health
8
Habitat for Humanity of Dutchess County Inc

Habitat for humanity of dutchess county transforms lives and our community by building quality home ownership opportunities for families in need and by uniting our entire community around the cause of affordable housing.

—
9
Connecticut Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Empower a statewide network of caring, consistent volunteer court appointed special advocates to advance the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect so every child can find a safe, permanent home to thrive.

Crime & Legal
10
Chatham Habitat for Humanity Inc

Create self-help opportunities for families to own affordable homes, improve their lives, and strength their communities.

—
11
Habitat for Humanity of N West Ct

Habitat for humanity of northwest ct, inc. is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to construct and rehabilitate homes for needy individuals and families in northwest connecticut.

—
12
Laurel House Inc

Psychosocial rehabilitation, supportive housing and occupational placement programs for those with severe mental illness.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hartford Interval House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rebuilding Together of Manchester Ct. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REBUILDING TOGETHER OF MANCHESTER CT: $30,000 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER OF MANCHESTER CTManchester Police Activity League: $25,000 · OtherManchester Police Activity LeagueMuscular Dystrophy Association: $25,000 · OtherMuscular Dystrophy AssociationMANCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $22,000 · OtherMANCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLSManchester Adult and Continuing Education: $20,000 · OtherManchester Adult and Continuing EducationMARC Inc: $14,800 · OtherMARC IncMHS Boys & Girls Outdoor Track & Field: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC INC: $8,600 · OtherDiyeso-Lewis House of TLC Foundation: $8,600 · OtherHARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC: $7,800 · Other+13 more: $35,925 · Other+13 moreMANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentLUTZ CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC: $8,000 · HealthGENTLE LOVE DIAPER PANTRY INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTLC FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesBLUE ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropySHOE4AFRICA INC: $600 · Recreation & Sports
Other$207,725Youth Development$20,000Arts & Culture$12,000Health$8,000Human Services$7,500Philanthropy$3,000Recreation & Sports$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER OF MANCHESTER CT: $30,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetMANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLUTZ CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $12,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC INC: $8,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC: $7,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGENTLE LOVE DIAPER PANTRY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetBLUE ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHOE4AFRICA INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER OF MANCHESTER CT ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTZ CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds HARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GENTLE LOVE DIAPER PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE ANGELS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TLC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOE4AFRICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Rockville Bank Community Foundation Inc · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Newalliance Foundation Inc · The Highland Park Families Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Manchester Road Race Committee Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Manchester Road Race Committee Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 79%
  • Community Health Resources Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Lutz Children's Museum Inc: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Manchester Road Race Committee Inc?

Find your warmest path to Manchester Road Race Committee Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Manchester Road Race Committee’s filings →

More from the funding graph