· Private foundation
Manchester Road Race Committee Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $64k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Manchester High School | $21,500 |
| Lutz Children Museum | $12,000 |
| Rebuilding Together of Manchester | $10,000 |
| Manchester Adult and Continuing Education | $10,000 |
| Manchester Police Activity League Inc | $10,000 |
| Manchester Community Emergency Response Team | $6,000 |
| MARC Inc | $5,300 |
| Muscular Dystrophy Association | $5,000 |
| The Manchester Sculpture Project | $5,000 |
| MHS Boys & Girls Outdoor Track & Field | $5,000 |
| Gentle Love Diaper Pantry Inc | $3,000 |
| MRC Track & Field Services | $2,350 |
| TLC Foundation | $1,500 |
| Girls on the Run Southeastern Connecticut | $1,500 |
| Case Mountain Cabin Inc | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RTREBUILDING TOGETHER OF MANCHESTER CT3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +51%
- MPManchester Police Activity League3× · 2023–2025 · $25k
- MDMuscular Dystrophy Association3× · 2023–2025 · $25k
Funded once
- MAMANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INCone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +16%
- CCCOMMUNITY CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC INCone grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue +17%
- DHDiyeso-Lewis House of TLC Foundationone grant, 2024 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Child Advocates of Connecticut (CAC) transforms the lives of vulnerable children and youth by providing trained and supervised one-on-one volunteer advocates in the community, classroom and courtroom.
The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…
Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.
Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.
Eastern connecticut housing opportunities, inc. is a non-profit organization organized to provide affordable housing to low-income families of southeastern connecticut.
To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.
The organization is dedicated to improving the health and well being of children from low income families in the greater manchester area. the organization is organized and operated exclusively support the child and health and welfare…
Habitat for humanity of dutchess county transforms lives and our community by building quality home ownership opportunities for families in need and by uniting our entire community around the cause of affordable housing.
Empower a statewide network of caring, consistent volunteer court appointed special advocates to advance the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect so every child can find a safe, permanent home to thrive.
Create self-help opportunities for families to own affordable homes, improve their lives, and strength their communities.
Habitat for humanity of northwest ct, inc. is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to construct and rehabilitate homes for needy individuals and families in northwest connecticut.
Psychosocial rehabilitation, supportive housing and occupational placement programs for those with severe mental illness.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hartford Interval House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rebuilding Together of Manchester Ct. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER OF MANCHESTER CT ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC ↗
- Who funds LUTZ CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GENTLE LOVE DIAPER PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE ANGELS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TLC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHOE4AFRICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Rockville Bank Community Foundation Inc · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Newalliance Foundation Inc · The Highland Park Families Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Manchester Road Race Committee Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Health Resources Inc — 79% of income from government
- Lutz Children's Museum Inc — 15% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Manchester Road Race Committee Inc?
Find your warmest path to Manchester Road Race Committee Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.